Arts-led regeneration in the UK: The rhetoric and the evidence on urban social inclusion

Abstract

This paper reviews the rhetoric of arts-led regeneration in the UK and reflects on its evidence base. We show how the notion of arts-led regeneration as a tool to combat social exclusion in our inner cities developed momentum for policy makers under a New Labour government, culminating in its status as a quasi-social fact. We critique this quasi-social fact and underline its limited and problematic evidence base. We offer suggestions for constructing a new and more robust evidence base.

Keywords

Arts-led regeneration evidence-based policy social inclusion urban regeneration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2008) Housing Market Renewal and Social Class. London: Routledge.

Amin

Massey

Thrift

(2000) Cities for the Many Not the Few. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Arts Council England (ACE) (1989) An Urban Renaissance: The Role of the Arts in Urban Regeneration. London: Arts Council England.

Arts Council England (ACE) (1999) Addressing Social Exclusion: A Framework for Action. London: Art Council England.

Arts Council England (ACE) (2006a) Our Agenda for the Arts: 2006-8. London: Arts Council England.

Arts Council England (ACE) (2006b) The Power of Art: Visual Arts: Evidence of Impact. London: Arts Council England.

Balibrea

(2001) Urbanism, culture and the post-industrial city: challenging the ‘Barcelona Model’. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies 2(2): 187–210.

Belfiore

(2002) Art as a means towards alleviating social exclusion: does it really work? – a critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK. International Journal of Cultural Policy 8(1) 91–106.

Bianchini

Parkinson

(1993) Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: The West European Experience. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

10.

Bianchini

Fisher

Montgomery

Worpole

(1988/1991) City Centre, City Cultures: The role of the Arts in the Revitalization of Towns and Cities. Manchester: The Centre for Local Economic Strategies.

11.

Bowler

McBurney

(1991) Gentrification and the avant garde in New York’s East Village: the good, the bad and the ugly. Theory, Culture and Society 8(4): 49–77.

12.

British and American Arts Association (BAAA) (1989) Arts and the Changing City: An Agenda for Urban Regeneration (ed. Keen ). British and American Arts Association: Keens Company.

13.

Butler

(2003) Changing People’s Lives – Art and Social Inclusion, Interrupt Artists in Socially Engaged Practice. London: Arts Council England.

14.

Cabinet Office (1998) Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal. UK: Cabinet Office.

15.

Cameron

Coafee

(2005) Art, gentrification and regeneration: from artist to pioneer to public arts. European Journal of Housing Policy 5(1): 39–58.

16.

CASE (2010) Understanding the value of engagement in culture and sport (work undertaken by Matrix Knowledge Group). Available at: www.culture.gov.uk/what_we_do/research_and_statistics/5698.aspx

17.

Catterall

(1998) Culture as a critical focus for effective urban regeneration (unpublished). Town and Country Planning Summer School 1988, University of York, UK.

18.

Comedia (1989) Creating a Real City: An Arts Action Programme for London Docklands. London: LDDC.

19.

Council of Europe (1997) In from the margins: A contribution to the debate on culture and development in Europe. Strasbourg: The European Task Force on Culture and Development, Council of Europe Publishing.

20.

DCLG (2011) Regeneration to enable growth: what government is doing in support of community-led regeneration. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/regeneration/pdf/1830137.pdf

21.

DCMS (1998) Creative Industries Mapping Document. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport/Stationery Office.

22.

DCMS (1999a) Local Cultural Strategies: Draft Guidance for Local Authorities in England. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport/Stationery Office.

23.

DCMS (1999b) The arts and neighbourhood renewal: a research report. Policy Action Team 10 (PAT 10) report to the Social Exclusion Unit/SEU. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport/Stationery Office.

24.

DCMS (2000a) Better Public Buildings: A Proud Legacy for the Future. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport/Stationery Office.

25.

DCMS (2000b) Creating Opportunities: Guidance for Local Authorities in England on Local Cultural Strategies. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport/Stationery Office.

26.

DCMS (2000c) Creative Industries: The Regional Dimension. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport/Stationery Office.

27.

DCMS (2001a) Building on PAT 10: The DCMS Report on Social Inclusion. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport/Stationery Office.

28.

DCMS (2001b) Creative Industries Mapping Document. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport/Stationery Office.

29.

DCMS (2002) Making it Count: The Contribution of Culture and Sport to Social Inclusion. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport/Stationery Office.

30.

DCMS (2004) Culture at the heart of regeneration. DCMS FOI Response – case number 91090. Available at: http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/freedom_of_information/91090doc6.pdf

31.

DCMS (2010) Understanding the Value of Engagement in Culture and Sport/CASE: Culture and Sport Evidence Programme. EPPI Centre/Matrix Knowledge Group.

32.

DETR (1999) Towards an Urban Renaissance. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

33.

DETR (2000) Our Towns and Cities – The Future: Delivering an Urban Renaissance. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions.

34.

DETR/CABE (2000) By Design: Urban Design in the Planning System: Towards a Better Practice. London: DETR/CABE.

35.

Deutsche

(1996) Evictions: Art and Spatial Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

36.

Dunn

Leeson

(1993) The art of change in the Docklands. In: Bird

Curtis

Putnam

. (eds) Mapping the Futures. London: Routledge, pp. 136–149.

37.

English Partnerships/Housing Corporation (2000) Urban Design Compendium. London: English Partnerships.

38.

Ennis

Douglass

(2011) Culture and regeneration – what evidence is there of a link and how can it be measured? Working paper 48, London: GLA.

39.

Evans

(2005) Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies 42(5/6): 959–983.

40.

Evans

Shaw

(2004) The Contribution of Culture to Regeneration in the UK: A Review of Evidence. Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

41.

Florida

(2002) The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.

42.

Gould

(2004) Developing the Role of the Arts in UK Social Policy. Creative Exchange.

43.

Hall

Robertson

(2001) Public art and urban regeneration: advocacy, claims and critical debates. Landscape Research 26(1): 5–26.

44.

Harvey

(2000) Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

45.

Hewitt

(2011) Privatizing the public: three rhetorics of art’s public good in ‘Third Way’ cultural policy. Art and the Public Sphere 1(1): 19–36.

46.

Hunt

(2010) Arts keynote speech. Available at: www.culture.gov.uk/news/ministers_speeches/7069.aspx

47.

Imrie

Raco

(2003) Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.

48.

Jermyn

(2001) The Arts and Social Exclusion: A Review Prepared for the Arts Council of England. London: Arts Council England.

49.

Joseph Rowntree Trust (2011) Response to communities and government select committee, regeneration to enable growth – what government is doing in support of community-led regeneration. Available at: http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/consultation-regeneration-growth.pdf

50.

JRF (1996) Social Policy Summary 8 The art of regeneration: urban renewal through cultural activity. Available at: www.jrf.org.uk/system/files/sp8.pdf

51.

Kearns

(2003) Social capital regeneration and urban policy. In: Imrie

Raco

(eds) Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 36–60.

52.

Landry

(2000) The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan.

53.

Landry

Bianchini

(1995) The Creative City. London: Demos.

54.

Landry

Greene

Matarasso

. (1996) The Art of Regeneration: Urban Renewal Through Cultural Activity. Stroud: Comedia (findings summarized by JRT, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).

55.

Lees

(2000) A reappraisal of gentrification: towards a ‘geography of gentrification’. Progress in Human Geography 24(3): 389–408.

56.

Lees

(2003) Visions of ‘Urban Renaissance’: the Urban Task Force Report and the Urban White Paper. In: Imrie

Raco

(eds) Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 61–82.

57.

Lees

(ed.) (2004) The Emancipatory City? Paradoxes and Possibilities. London: SAGE.

58.

Lees

(2008) Gentrification and social mixing: towards an urban renaissance? Urban Studies 45(12): 2449–2470.

59.

Lees

Slater

Wyly

(2008) Gentrification. New York: Routledge.

60.

Leeson

(2008) Art with communities: reflections on a changing landscape, Ixia public art think tank. Available at: http://ixia-info.com/new-writing/loraineleeson/

61.

Levitas

(1998) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

62.

Ley

(1996) The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

63.

Ley

(2003) Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification. Urban Studies 40(12): 2527–2544.

64.

Massey

Rose

(2003) Personal views: public art research project. Social Sciences Faculty, The Open University, UK (commissioned by Artpoint on behalf of Milton Keynes Council).

65.

Matarasso

(1997) Use or Ornament? The Social Impact of Participation in the Arts. Stroud: Comedia.

66.

Matarasso

(2009) The human factor: experiences of arts evaluation. Available at: http://web.me.com/matarasso

67.

Maycock

(1998) Regeneration and the Arts in London Docklands. London: LDDC.

68.

Merli

(2002) Evaluating the social impact of participation in arts activities: a critical review of Francois Matarasso’s “Use or ornament?” International Journal of Cultural Policy 8(1): 107–118.

69.

Miles

(1997) Art, Space and the City. London: Routledge.

70.

Miles

(2005) Interruptions: testing the rhetoric of culturally-led urban redevelopment. Urban Studies 42(5–6): 833–840.

71.

Miles

Paddison

(2005) The rise and rise of culture led urban regeneration. Urban Studies 42(5–6): 833–840.

72.

Moriarty

(2002) Sharing Practice: A Guide to Self-Evaluation in the Context of Social Exclusion. London: Arts Council England.

73.

Myerscough

(1988) The Economic Importance of the Arts in Britain. London: Policy Studies Institute.

74.

Nathan

Marshall

(2006) Them and us: Britain and the European city. Research paper no. 7. London: Centre for Cities/IPPR.

75.

Newman

Curtis

Stephens

(2003) Do community-based arts projects result in social gains? A review of the literature. Community Development Journal 38(4): 310–322.

76.

O’Brien

(2010) Measuring the value of culture: a report to the DCMS, 15 Decmber.

77.

ODPM (2004) Making it Happen: Urban Renaissance and Prosperity in Our Core Cities. London: ODPM/Stationery Office.

78.

ODPM/DCLG (1999) Regeneration through culture, sport and tourism. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/archived/publications/localgovernment/regenerationthroughculture

79.

Paddison

(2001) Communities in the city. In: Paddison

(ed.) Handbook of Urban Studies. London: SAGE, pp. 194–205.

80.

Phillips

(2000 [1988]) Out of order: the public art machine. In: Miles

Borden

Hall

(eds) The City Cultures Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 96–102.

81.

Pratt

(2008) Creative cities: the cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geography 90(2): 107–117.

82.

Pratt

(2009) The creative and cultural economy and the recession. Geoforum 40: 495–496.

83.

Reeves

(2002) Measuring the economic and social impact of the arts: a review. ACE research report 24. London: Arts Council England.

84.

Ruiz

(2004) A literature review of the evidence base for culture, the arts and sport policy. The Scottish Executive. Available at: http://scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/17002/0023718.pdf

85.

Selwood

(1995) The Benefits of Public Art: The Polemics of Permanent Art in Public Places. London: Policy Studies Institute.

86.

Selwood

(2001) The UK Cultural Sector: Profile and Policy issues. London: PSI.

87.

Sharp

Pollock

Paddison

(2005) Just art for a just city: public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Studies 42(5/6): 1001–1023.

88.

Shaw

(1993) Percent for Art: A Review. Arts Council England.

89.

Slater

Iles

(2010) No Room to Move: Radical Art and the Degenerate City. UK: Mute Books.

90.

Smith

(1998) Creative Britain. London: Faber.

91.

Smith

(1996) The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London and New York: Routledge.

92.

Social Exclusion Unit (SEU) (2000) Cabinet Office, 2000, The social exclusion leaflet. Available at: www.cabinetofficegov.uk/seu/index/march

93.

Stevenson

(2004) ‘Civic gold’ rush: cultural planning and the politics of the Third Way. International Journal of Cultural Policy 10: 119–131.

94.

Tornaghi

(2007) Questioning the social aims of public art in urban regeneration initiatives: the case of Newcastle upon Tyne and Gateshead (UK). Available at: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/guru/assets/documents/EWP42.pdf

95.

UNCHS (2004) The state of the world’s cities 2004/2005 - globalization and culture. UN-HABITAT

96.

Urban Task Force (2005) Towards a strong urban renaissance. An independent report by members of the Urban Task Force chaired by Lord Rogers of Riverside.

97.

Vickery

(2007) The Emergence of Culture-Led Regeneration: A Policy Concept and its Discontents. Warwick: Centre for Cultural Policy Studies, Warwick University.

98.

Wynne

(ed.) (1992) The Culture Industry. Aldershot: Arena.

99.

Zukin

(1982) Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.