Many recent studies maintain that regional characteristics influence the innovative performances, innovation processes and innovation patterns of firms. Based on a representative sample of knowledge-intensive firms in Norway, this paper analyses the innovation output, innovation partners, knowledge sources, and localization of sources and partners for knowledge-intensive firms in three types of region: large urban regions, small urban regions and rural areas.The empirical results contradict some of the assumptions of the literature dealing with agglomeration economies, regional clusters, and so on. We find, for example, that the firms’ innovation partners and knowledge sources are quite similar irrespective of location. This may indicate that the relevant innovation systems in knowledge-intensive industries in Norway are sectoral and national rather than regional. The paper also finds that the small urban regions and the rural regions have a higher share of innovating, knowledge-intensive firms than the large urban regions, which may partly be explained by a much higher rate of public funding of innovation activity in the first two regional types. However, the large urban regions have higher new firm formation rates and more radically innovating firms than the other two types of region. The paper discusses to what extent the concept of open innovation may contribute to explaining the empirical results, because firms in large urban regions can rely more on open innovation than firms in other regions.
Asheim, B. and Isaksen, A. ( 2000) ‘Localised Knowledge, Interactive Learning and Innovation: Between Regional Networks and Global Corporations’, in E. Vatne and M. Tayloe (eds) The Networked Firm in a Global World. Small Firms in New Environments, pp. 163-98. Aldershot: Ashgate.
2.
Asheim, B., Cooke, P. and Martin, R. ( 2006) ‘The Rise of the Cluster Concept in Regional Analysis and Policy. A Critical Assessment’, in B. T. Asheim, P. Cooke and R. Martin (eds) Clusters and Regional Development. Critical Reflections and Explorations, pp. 1-29. London and New York: Routledge.
3.
Baptista, R. and Swann, P. ( 1998) ‘Do Firms in Clusters Innovate More?’, Research Policy27: 525-40.
4.
Bathelt, H. ( 2009) ‘Re-bundling and the Development of Hollow Clusters in the East German Chemical Industry’, European Urban and Regional Studies16 (4): 363-81.
5.
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. ( 2004) ‘Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation’, Progress in Human Geography28 (1): 31-56.
6.
Best, M. ( 2001) The New Competitive Advantage. The Renewal of American Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
Boschma, R. ( 2005) ‘Proximity and Innovation: a Critical Assessment’ , Regional Studies39 (1): 61-74.
8.
Boschma, R. and Ter Wal, A.L.J. ( 2007) ‘Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: the Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy’ , Industry and Innovation14 (2): 177-99.
9.
Chesbrough, H.W. ( 2003) ‘The Era of Open Innovation’, MIT Sloan Review (Spring): 35-41.
10.
Chesbrough, H.W. ( 2006) Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11.
Coenen, L. and Asheim, B.T. ( 2006) ‘Constructing Regional Advantage at the Northern Edge’, in P. Cooke and A. Piccaluga (eds) Regional Development in the Knowledge Economy, pp. 84-110. London: Routledge.
12.
Cooke, P. ( 2002) Knowledge Economies. Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage. London and New York: Routledge.
13.
Cooke, P., Boekholt, P. and Tödtling, F. ( 2000) The Governance of Innovation in Europe. Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness. London: Pinter.
14.
Duranton, G. and Puga, D. ( 2002) ‘Diversity and Specialization in Cities: Why, Where and When Does It Matter?’, in P. McCann (ed.) Industrial Location Economics, pp. 151-86. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
15.
Edquist, C. and Hommen, L. ( 2008) ‘Comparing National Systems of Innovation in Asia and Europe: Theory and Comparative Framework’, in C. Edquist and L. Hommen (eds) Small Country Innovation Systems. Globalization, Change and Policy in Asia and Europe, pp. 1-28. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
16.
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C. and Nelson, R. R. (eds) (2005) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Feldman, M.P. and Audretsch, D.B. ( 1999) ‘Innovation in Cities: Science-based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition’, European Economic Review43: 409-29.
18.
Frenken, K., Van Oort, F. and Verburg, T. ( 2007) ‘Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth’, Regional Studies41 (5): 685-98.
19.
Gertler, M.S. and Levitte, Y.M. ( 2005) ‘Local Nodes in Global Networks: the Geography of Knowledge Flows in Biotechnology Innovation’, Industry and Innovation12 (4): 487-507.
20.
Giuliani, E. and Bell, M. ( 2005) ‘The Micro-determinants of Meso-level Learning and Innovation: Evidence from a Chilean Wine Cluster’, Research Policy34: 47-68.
21.
Hanson, J. and Wicken, O. ( 2008) Rik på nature - Innovasjon i en ressursbasert kunnskapsøkonomi . Bergen: Fakbokforlaget.
22.
Isaksen, A. ( 2006) ‘Knowledge-intensive Industries and Regional Development. The Case of the Software Industry in Norway’, in P. Cooke and A. Piccaluga (eds) Regional Development in the Knowledge Economy, pp. 43-62. London and New York: Routledge.
23.
Jakobsen, S.-E. and Onsager, K. ( 2008) ‘Innovasjonspolitikk for regional næringsutvikling’ , in A. Isaksen, A. Karlsen and B. Sæther (eds) Innovasjoner i norske næringer - et geografisk perspektiv, pp. 269-88. Bergen : Fakbokforlaget.
24.
Ki, J.-H. ( 2001) ‘The Role of Two Agglomeration Economies in the Production of Innovation: a Comparison between Localization Economies and Urbanization Economies’, Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies2 (2): 103-17.
25.
Kitson, M., Martin, R. and Tyler, P. ( 2004) ‘Regional Competitiveness: an Elusive Yet Key Concept?’ , Regional Studies38 (9): 991-9.
26.
Leamer, E.E. and Storper, M. ( 2001) ‘The Economic Geography of the Internet Age’ , Journal of International Business Studies32 (4): 641-65.
27.
Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (eds) (2006) How Europe’s Economies Learn: Coordinating Competing Models. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
28.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.) (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
29.
Lundvall, B.-Å. and Johnson, B. ( 1994) ‘The Learning Economy’, Journal of Industry Studies1 (2): 23-42.
30.
Malerba, F. ( 2004) ‘Sectoral Systems: Concepts and Issues’, in F. Malerba (ed.) Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. ( 2002) ‘The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies. Towards a Knowledge-based Theory of Spatial Clustering’, Environment and Planning A34: 429-49.
32.
Malmberg, A. and Power, D. ( 2006) ‘True Clusters. A Severe Case of Conceptual Headache’ , in B. T. Asheim, P. Cooke and R. Martin (eds) Clusters and Regional Development. Critical Reflections and Explorations, pp. 50-68. London and New York : Routledge.
33.
Markusen, A. ( 1999) ‘Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: the Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies’, Regional Studies33 (9): 869-84.
34.
Martin, R. and P. Sunley ( 2006) ‘Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution’ , Journal of Economic Geography6: 395-437.
35.
Morrison, A. ( 2008) ‘Gatekeepers of Knowledge within Industrial Districts: Who They Are, How They Interact’, Regional Studies42 (6): 817-35.
36.
OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] (2001) OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2001 - Towards a Knowledge Based Economy. Paris : OECD.
37.
Oecd (2007) Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2007. Paris: OECD.
38.
Oecd (2008) OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy. Norway. Paris: OECD.
39.
Onsager, K., Isaksen, A., Fraas, M. and Johnstad, T. ( 2007) ‘Technology Cities in Norway: Innovating in Glocal Networks’, European Planning Studies15: 549-66.
40.
Porter, M. ( 1998) ‘Clusters and the New Economics of Competition’ , Harvard Business Review (November- December): 77-90.
Power, D. and Scott, A.J. ( 2004) ‘A Prelude to Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture’, in D. Power and A. J. Scott (eds) Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture, pp. 3-15. London and New York: Routledge.
43.
Reve, T. and Jakobsen, E.W. ( 2001) Et verdiskapende Norge. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
44.
Storper, M. ( 1997) The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. New York: Guilford Press .
45.
Teirlinck, P. and Spithoven, A. ( 2008) ‘The Spatial Organization of Innovation: Open Innovation, External Knowledge Relations and Urban Structure’, Regional Studies42 (5): 689-704.
46.
Therrien, P. ( 2005) ‘City and Innovation: Different Size, Different Strategy’, European Planning Studies13 (6): 853-77.
47.
Weterings, A. and Boschma, R. ( 2006) ‘The Impact of Geography on the Innovative Productivity of Software Firms in the Netherlands’, in P. Cooke and A. Piccaluga (eds) Regional Development in the Knowledge Economy, pp. 63-83. London and New York: Routledge.
