People responsible for regional development often understand fairly well the need to construct regional advantage and build clusters. They also know the importance of industry—university interaction and they have been taught to respect innovation systems and to build them. But what they have not been given much advice on is how to do it — how to create networks for these purposes, how to direct and maintain them, how to lead complex policy networks. Network management, or leadership in networks, in the context of regional economic development is a black box not only for practitioners but for academics too. The research questions discussed here are: a) what do regional development officers actually do in the early 21st century to gain influence in policy networks, and hence in their efforts to promote regional development, and b), related to the first question, what are the key processes in their efforts to mobilize policy networks and guide them. The empirical research is based on data gathered through 41 interviews with Finnish actors responsible for the promotion of regional development at different levels of regional development activity.
Agranoff, R. and McGuire, M. ( 1999) ‘Big Questions in Public Network Management Research’ , paper presented at the Fifth National Public Management Research Conference, Texas A&M University , College Station, 3-4 December.
2.
Amin, A. ( 2001) ‘Moving on: Institutionalism in Economic Geography’ . Environment and Planning A33 (7): 1237-41.
3.
Amin, A. and Thrift, N. ( 1995) ‘Globalisation, Institutional "Thickness" and the Local Economy’, in P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham and A. Madani-Pour (eds) Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, pp. 91-108. London : John Wiley.
4.
Bathelt, H. ( 2005) ‘Geographies of Production: Growth Regimes in Spatial Perspective (II) - Knowledge Creation and Growth in Clusters’, Progress in Human Geography29 (2): 204-16.
5.
Benneworth, P. ( 2007) ‘Leading Innovation: Building Effective Regional Coalitions for Innovation’. Research report, December. London: Nesta.
6.
Bragg, M. ( 1996) Reinventing Influence: How to Get Things Done in a World without Authority. London: Pitman Publishing.
7.
Bruun, H. ( 2002a) ‘The Emergence of Regional Innovation Network: A Process Analysis of the Local Bio-Grouping in Turku’, in M. Sotarauta and H. Bruun (eds) Nordic Perspectives on Process-based Regional Development Policy, pp. 79-124. Nordregio report 2002: 3. Stockholm.
8.
Bruun, H. ( 2002b) ‘Mobilising a Regional Lighthouse: a Study of the Digital North Denmark Programme’, in M. Sotarauta and H. Bruun (eds) Nordic Perspectives on Process-based Regional Development Policy, pp. 125-56. Nordregio report 2002:3. Stockholm.
9.
Bryson, J.M. and Crosby, B.C. ( 1992) Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared-power World. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
10.
Cooke, P. and Piccaluga, A. (eds) (2004) Regional Economies as Knowledge Laboratories. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
11.
Cumbers, A., Macinnon, D. and McMaster, R. ( 2003) ‘Institutions, Power and Space: Assessing the Limits to Institutionalism in Economic Geography’, European Urban and Regional Studies10 (4): 325-42.
12.
Flyvbjerg, B. ( 1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Heifetz, R.A. ( 2003) Leadership without Easy Answers, 13th edn. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
14.
Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. ( 2000) ‘Network Power in Collaborative Planning’ . IURD Working paper series, Institute for Urban and Regional Planning, California State University.
15.
Judd, D. and Parkinson, M. (eds) (1990) Urban Leadership and Regeneration . Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, vol. 37. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Kenis, P. and Schneider, V. ( 1991) ‘Policy Networks and Policy Analysis: Scrutinizing a New Analytical Toolbox’, in B. Marin and R. Mayntz (eds) Policy Networks, Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations, pp. 25-59. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17.
Kickert, W. ( 1993) ‘Complexity, Governance and Dynamics: Conceptual Explorations of Public Network Management’, in J. Kooiman (ed.) Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, pp. 191-204. London: Sage Publications .
18.
Kickert, W., Klijn, E.-H. and Koppenjan, J. ( 1997) Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector . London: Sage.
19.
Klijn, E.-H. ( 1996) ‘Analyzing and Managing Policy Processes in Complex Networks’, Administration and Society28 (1): 90-119.
20.
Klijn, E.-H. and Teisman, G.R. ( 1997) ‘Strategies and Games in Networks’, in W. Kickert, E.-H. Klijn and J. Koppenjan (eds) Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, pp. 98-118. London : Sage.
21.
Kostiainen, J. and Sotarauta, M. ( 2003) ‘Great Leap or Long March to Knowledge Economy: Institutions, Actors and Resources in the Development of Tampere, Finland’, European Planning Studies10 (5): 415-38.
22.
Krätke, S. (2010) ‘Regional Knowledge Networks: a Network Analysis Approach to the Interlinking of Knowledge Resources’, European Urban and Regional Studies17 (1): 83-97.
23.
Lagendijk, A. ( 2003) ‘Towards Conceptual Quality in Regional Studies: the Need for Subtle Critique - a Response to Markussen’, SECONS Discussion Forum Contribution No. 3.
24.
Lagendijk, A., Serap, K. and Suna, Y. ( 2009) ‘The Role of Regional Development Agencies in Turkey: from Implementing EU Directives to Supporting Regional Business Communities?’ , European Urban and Regional Studies16 (4): 383-96.
25.
Lehtimäki, M. ( 2005) Strategy Configuration of a Technology Center as an Innovation System - Historical Perspective on the Story of Hermia. Tampere: Tampere University of Technology.
26.
Lester, R. and Piore, M. ( 2004) Innovation - The Missing Dimension. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Linnamaa, R. ( 2002) ‘Development Process of the ICT Cluster in the Jyväskylä Urban Region’, in M. Sotarauta and H. Bruun (eds) Nordic Perspectives on Process-based Regional Development Policy, pp. 29-78. Nordregio report 2002:3 . Stockholm.
28.
Lynn, E.L., Heinrich, C.J. and Hill, C.J. ( 2000) ‘Studying Governance and Public Management: Why? How?’, in C.J. Heinrich and E.L. Lynn (eds) Governance and Performance: New Perspectives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29.
Männistö, J. ( 2002) ‘Voluntaristinen alueellinen innovaatiojärjestelmä: Tapaustutkimus Oulun ict-klusterista’ [A voluntaristic regional innovation system: the ICT cluster in the Oulu area]. Acta universitatis lappoensis46. Rovaniemi.
30.
Nonaka, I. and Konno, N. ( 1998) ‘The Concept of "Ba": Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation’, California Management Review40 (3): 40-54.
31.
Philo, C. and Parr, H. ( 2000) ‘Institutional Geographies: Introductory Remarks’ , Geoforum31 (4): 513-21.
32.
Pierre, J. ( 2000) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
33.
Raunio, M. ( 2005) Aivovuodosta aivokiertoon. Huippuosaajat talouden voimavarana [From brain drain to brain circulation: Highly skilled experts as a key resource of economy]. EVA-raportti. Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki.
34.
Sotarauta, M. ( 1996) Kohti epäselvyyden hallintaa: Pehmeä strategia 2000-luvun alun suunnittelun lähtökohtana [Towards governance of ambiguity: Soft strategy as a starting point for planning at the beginning of 2000]Acta Futura Fennica No. 6. Jyväskylä: Finnpublishers.
35.
Sotarauta, M. ( 2005) ‘Shared Leadership and Dynamic Capabilities in Regional Development’, in I. Sagan and H. Halkier (eds) Regionalism Contested: Institution, Society and Governance. Urban and Regional Planning and Development Series . Aldershot: Ashgate.
36.
Sotarauta, M. and Bruun, H. (eds) (2002) Nordic Perspectives on Process-based Regional Development Policy. Nordregio report2002:3. Stockholm .
37.
Sotarauta, M. and Kautonen, M. ( 2007) ‘Co-evolution of the Finnish National and Local Innovation and Science Arenas: Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Multi-level Governance’, Regional Studies41 (8): 1085-98.
38.
Sotarauta, M. and Kosonen, K. ( 2004) ‘Strategic Adaptation to the Knowledge Economy in Less Favoured Regions: a South-Ostrobothnian University Network as a Case in Point’, in P. Cooke and A. Piccaluga (eds) Regional Economies as Knowledge Laboratories. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
39.
Sotarauta, M. and Lakso, T. ( 2000) Muutoksen johtaminen ja luova jännite: Tutkimus Kainuun kehittämistoiminnasta’ [Change management and creative tension: a study of promotion of economic development in Kainuu region]. Acta-sarja 132. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto .
40.
Termeer, C.J.A.M. and Koppenjan, J.F.M. ( 1997) ‘Managing Perceptions in Networks’, in W.J.M. Kickert, E-H. Klijn and J.F.M. Koppenjan (eds) Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, pp. 79-97. London : Sage Publications.
41.
Tervo, H. ( 2002) Rakkaudesta teknologiaan: Toimijaverkostonäkökulma Oulun IT-keskittymän rakentumiseen ja toimintaan [For the love of technology: an actor network approach to the construction and development of the IT cluster in Oulu]. Acta universitatis lappoensis76. Rovaniemi.
42.
Weick, K. ( 1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications.
43.
Wrong, D.H. ( 1997) Power: Its, Forms, Bases, and Uses. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
