This article analyses spatial patterns of party support in the five post-Soviet
transitional countries: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Russia, and Ukraine. Data on
electoral geography is employed to measure the degrees and dynamics of political
autonomy and institutionalization of party systems in the former republics of the
Soviet Union. A comparison of post-independence electoral cycles reveals a number of
important similarities and differences between the regional strength of party
support in the Baltic states, Russia, and Ukraine over time. Although all five
countries manifest a tendency towards a greater regional homogeneity of the regional
support for the major political organizations, the pace of this trend and patterns
of party-system nationalization are different in different countries.
Agnew, J.A.
(1988)
‘“Better Thieves Than Reds”? The
Nationalization Thesis and the Possibility of a Geography of Italian Politics’
, Political Geography Quarterly7 (4):
307-321
.
2.
Agnew, J.A.
(1990) ‘From Political Methodology to
Geographical Social Theory? A Critical Review of Electoral Geography,
1960-87’, in
R.J. Johnston
,
F.M. Shelley
and
P.J. Taylor
(eds) Developments in Electoral Geography, pp.
15-21.
London: Routledge
.
3.
Agnew, J.A.
(2002) Place and Politics in Modern Italy.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
4.
Allison, P.D.
(1978)
‘Measures of Inequality’
, American Sociological Review43 (6):
865-880
.
5.
Berglund, S.
(1990) ‘Introduction’, in
S. Berglund
and
S. Thomsen
(eds) Modern Political Ecological Analysis.
Åbo, Sweden: Åbo Akademis Förlag
.
6.
Bielasiak, J.
(2002)
‘The Institutionalization of Electoral and Party Systems in
Postcommunist States’
, Comparative Politics34 (2):
189-210
.
7.
Bungs, D.
(1993)
‘Moderates Win Parliamentary Elections in Latvia’
, RFE/RL Research Report, 9 July.
8.
Caramani, D.
(2004) The Nationalization of Politics: the Formation of
National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
9.
Clem, R.S.
and
Craumer, P.R.
(1995a)
‘The Politics of Russia’s Regions: a Geographical
Analysis of the Russian Election and Constitutional Plebiscite of December 1993’
, Post-Soviet Geography36 (8):
459-475
.
10.
Clem, R.S.
and
Craumer, P.R.
(1995b)
‘The Geography of the Russian 1995 Parliamentary Election:
Continuity, Change, and Correlates’
, Post-Soviet Geography36 (10):
586-616
.
11.
Clem, R.S.
and
Craumer, P.R.
(2000)
‘Regional Patterns of Political Preference in Russia: the
December 1999 Duma Elections’
, Post-Soviet Geography and Economics41 (1):
1-29
.
12.
Clem, R.S.
and
Craumer, P.R.
(2004)
‘Redrawing the Political Map of Russia: the Duma Election of
December 2003’
, Eurasian Geography and Economics45 (4):
241-261
.
13.
Diamond, L.
and
Linz, J.J.
(1989) ‘Introduction: Politics, Society, and
Democracy in Latin America’, in
L. Diamond
,
J.J. Linz
, and
S.M. Lipset
(eds) Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America, pp.
1-58.
Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner
.
14.
Dix, R.H.
(1992)
‘Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American
Political Parties’
, Comparative Political Studies24 (4):
488-511
.
15.
Hinich, M.J.
,
Khmelko, V.
and
Ordeshook, P.C.
(1999)
‘Ukraine’s 1998 Parliamentary Elections: a Spatial Analysis’
, Post-Soviet Affairs15 (2):
149-185
.
16.
Hopkin, J.
(2003)
‘Political Decentralization, Electoral Change and Party
Organizational Adaptation’
, European Urban and Regional Studies10 (3):
227-237
.
17.
Hough, J.F.
(1998)
‘The Political Geography of European Russia: Republics and Oblasts’
, Post-Soviet Geography and Economics39 (2):
63-95
.
18.
Huntington, S.P.
(1965)
‘Political Development and Political Decay’
, World PoliticsXVII (3):
386-431
.
19.
Huntington, S.P.
(1968) Political Order in Changing Societies.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
.
20.
Janda, K.
(1980) Political Parties: a Cross-national Survey.
New York: Free Press
.
21.
Jin, Y.
(1995)
‘Testing Political Party Institutionalization: a Theory and Practice’
, Journal of Political and Military Sociology23 (Summer):
43-63
.
22.
Jones, M.P.
and
Mainwaring, S.
(2003)
‘The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: an Empirical
Measure and an Application to the Americas’
, Party Politics9 (2):
139-166
.
23.
Katz, R.S.
(1987) ‘Party Government and Its
Alternatives’, in
R.S. Katz
(ed.) Future of Party Government: Party Governments - European and
American Experiences, pp. 1-26.
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
.
24.
Keohane, R.
(1969)
‘Institutionalization in the United Nations General Assembly’
, International Organization23 (4):
859-896
.
25.
Lane, J-E.
, and
Ersson, S.O.
(1999) Politics and Society in Western Europe.
London: Sage Publications
.
26.
Levitsky, S.
(1998)
‘Institutionalization and Peronism,’Party Politics4 (1):
77-92
.
27.
Lewis, P.G.
(1994)
‘Democratization and Party Development in Eastern Europe’
, Democratization1 (3):
391-405
.
28.
Lutz, J.M.
(1995) ‘Diffusion of Voting Support: the Radical
Party in Italy’, in
M. Eagles
(ed.) Spatial and Contextual Models in Political Research, pp.
43-61.
London: Taylor & Francis
.
29.
McGuire, J.W.
(1997) Peronism Without Peron: Unions, Parties, and Democracy
in Argentina.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
30.
Mainwaring, S.
and
Scully, T.R.
(1995) ‘Introduction: Party Systems in Latin
America’, in
S. Mainwaring
and
T.R. Scully
(eds) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin
America, pp. 1-34.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
31.
Meleshevich, A.
(forthcoming) Party Systems in Post-Soviet Countries: a Comparative
Study of Political Institutionalization in the Baltic States, Russia, and
Ukraine.
New York: Palgrave Macmillan
.
32.
O’Loughlin, J.
,
Shin, M.
and
Talbot, P.
(1996)
‘Political Geographies and Cleavages in the Russian Parliamentary Elections’
, Post-Soviet Geography and Economics37 (6):
355-385
.
33.
Openshaw, S.
and
Taylor, P.J.
(1979) ‘A Million or so Correlation
Coefficients: Three Experiments on the Modifiable Areal Unit
Problem’, in
N. Wrigley
(ed.) Statistical Applications in the Spatial Sciences,pp.
127-144.
London: Pion
.
34.
Orttung, R.W.
and
Parrish, S.
(1996)
‘Duma Votes Reflect North-South Divide’
, Transition2 (4):
12-14
.
35.
Panebianco, A.
(1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
36.
Polsby, N.
(1968)
‘The Institutionalization of the US House of Representatives’
, APSR62 (1):
144-168
.
37.
Randall, V.
and
Sväsand, L.
(2002)
‘Party Institutionalization in New Democracies’
, Party Politics8 (1):
5-29
.
38.
Reynolds, D.R.
(1990) ‘Whither Electoral
Geography’, in
R.J. Johnston
,
F.M. Shelley
and
P.J. Taylor
(eds) Developments in Electoral Geography, pp.
22-35.
London: Routledge
.
39.
Rokkan, S.
(1970) Citizens, Elections, Parties.
Oslo: Universitetsforlaget-McKay
.
40.
Slider, D.
,
Gimpel’son, V.
and
Chugrov, S.
(1994)
‘Political Tendencies in Russia’s Regions: Evidence
from the 1993 Parliamentary Elections’
, Slavic Review53 (3):
711-732
.
41.
Stepan, A.
(2001) Arguing Comparative Politics.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
42.
Tucker, J.A.
(2002)
‘The First Decade of Post-Communist Elections and Voting: What
Have We Studied, and How Have We Studied It?’
, Annual Review of Political Science5:
271-304
.
43.
van Biezen, I.
(2003) Political Parties in New Democracies: Party
Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe.
Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan
.
44.
Welfling, M.B.
(1973) Political Institutionalization: Comparative Analysis
of African Party Systems.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
.
45.
Yule, G.U.
and
Kendall, M.G.
(1950) An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics.
London: Charles Griffin
.
