Ethical dilemmas in nursing documentation

Abstract

Background:

Nursing documentation is an essential aspect of ethical nursing care. Lack of awareness of ethical dilemmas in nursing documentation may increase the risk of patient harm. Considering this, ethical dilemmas within nursing documentation need to be explored.

Aim:

To explore ethical dilemmas in nurses’ conversations about nursing documentation.

Research design, participants and context:

The study used a qualitative design. Participants were registered nurses from a Patient Hotel at a Danish University Hospital. Data were collected in three focus groups with a total of 12 participants. Data analysis consisted of qualitative content analysis inspired by Graneheim and Lundman.

Ethical consideration:

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of research and regulations in terms of confidentiality, anonymity and provision of informed consent.

Findings:

Ethical dilemmas were strongly present in nurses’ conversations about nursing documentation. These dilemmas were demonstrated in two themes: (1) a dilemma between respecting patients’ autonomy and not causing harm, which was visible in nurses’ navigation between written documentation and oral tradition, and (2) a dilemma concerning justice and fair distribution of goods, which was visible in nurses’ balancing between documenting deviations and proof of nursing practice.

Discussion:

Ethical dilemmas in nursing documentation regarding respecting patients’ autonomy and not causing harm accentuated discussions on professional responsibility and patient participation in clinical decisions. Dilemmas in justice and fair distribution of goods emphasised discussions on trust in relationships versus trust in electronic health records.

Conclusion:

Actual tendencies in the healthcare system may increase ethical dilemmas in nursing documentation. Sharing otherwise invisible and individual experiences of ethical dilemmas in nursing documentation among nurses, nurse leaders and decision-makers will enable addressing these in reflections and discussions as well as in considering adjustments of conditions for nursing documentation.

Keywords

Content analysis dilemma ethics focus groups nursing documentation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Toney-Butler

Unison-Pace

. Nursing admission assessment and examination. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC., 2020.

Jefferies

Johnson

Griffiths

. A meta-study of the essentials of quality nursing documentation. Int J Nurs Pract 2010; 16(2): 112–124.

Johnson

Jefferies

Langdon

. The Nursing and Midwifery Content Audit Tool (NMCAT): a short nursing documentation audit tool. J Nurs Manag 2010; 18(7): 832–845.

Søndergaard

Lorentzen

Sørensen

, et al. The documentation practice of perioperative nurses: a literature review. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26(13–14): 1757–1769.

Blair

Smith

. Nursing documentation: frameworks and barriers. Contemp Nurse 2012; 41(2): 160–168.

Collins

Vawdrey

. ‘Reading between the lines’ of flow sheet data: nurses’ optional documentation associated with cardiac arrest outcomes. Appl Nurs Res 2012; 25(4): 251–257.

Kamil

Rachmah

Wardani

. What is the problem with nursing documentation? Perspective of Indonesian nurses. Intl J of Africa Nurs Sci 2018; 9: 111–114.

Gesner

Gazarian

Dykes

. The burden and burnout in documenting patient care: an integrative literature review. Stud Health Technol Inform 2019; 264: 1194–1198.

Thompson

Melia

Boyd

, et al. Nursing ethics. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2006.

10.

Grace

. Professional advocacy: widening the scope of accountability. Nurs Phil 2001; 2(2): 151–162.

11.

McCarthy

Fitzgerald

O’Shea

, et al. Electronic nursing documentation interventions to promote or improve patient safety and quality care: a systematic review. J Nurs Manag 2019; 27(3): 491–501.

12.

Weaver

Morse

Mitcham

. Ethical sensitivity in professional practice: concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62(5): 607–618.

13.

Gillon

. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ 1994; 309(6948): 184–188.

14.

Gillon

. Ethics needs principles – four can encompass the rest – and respect for autonomy should be ‘first among equals’. J Med Ethics 2003; 29(5): 307–312.

15.

Molina-Mula

Gallo-Estrada

. Impact of nurse-patient relationship on quality of care and patient autonomy in decision-making. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(3): 835.

16.

Kollerup

Vinther

Jørgensen

. Patient participation in nursing documentation: a qualitative descriptive study. Nordic J Nurs Res 2020; 40(4): 197–204.

17.

Graneheim

Lundman

. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24(2): 105–112.

18.

Graneheim

Lindgren

Lundman

. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today 2017; 56: 29–34.

19.

Tong

Sainsbury

Craig

. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Intl J Qual Health Care 2007; 19(6): 349–357.

20.

Morgan

. Focus groups as qualitative research: planning and research design for focus groups. 2nd ed. London: Sage Research Methods, 1997.

21.

Morrison-Beedy

Côté-Arsenault

Feinstein

. Maximizing results with focus groups: moderator and analysis issues. Appl Nurs Res 2001; 14(1): 48–53.

22.

Morgan

. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: Sage Research Methods, 1997.

23.

Morse

. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res 2015; 25(9): 1212–1222.

24.

Northern Nurses´ Federation. Ethical guidelines for nursing research in the Nordic countries, 2003, https://ssn-norden.dk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ssns_etiske_retningslinjer_0-003.pdf

25.

Smeulers

Lucas

Vermeulen

. Effectiveness of different nursing handover styles for ensuring continuity of information in hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 6: CD009979.

26.

McCloskey

Furlong

Hansen

. Patient, family and nurse experiences with patient presence during handovers in acute care hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2019; 17(5): 754–792.

27.

Haahr

Norlyk

Martinsen

, et al. Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: a review. Nurs Ethics 2020; 27(1): 258–272.

28.

Delmar

Becoming whole: Kari Martinsen’s philosophy of care – selected concepts and impact on clinical nursing. Intl J Human Caring 2013; 17(3): 20–28.

29.

Beauchamp

Childress

. Beneficence: principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

30.

Holden

. Responsibility and autonomous nursing practice. J Adv Nurs 1991; 16(4): 398–403.

31.

International Council of Nurses. The ICN code of ethics for nurses. Geneva: International Council of Nurses, 2012.

32.

Råd

Sygeplejeetisk

. De sygeplejeetiske retningslinjer [Ethical guidelines for nurses]. Danish Council of Nursing Ethics, 2014.

33.

Verkerk

. The care perspective and autonomy. Med Health Care Philos 2001; 4(3): 289–294.

34.

Gastmans

. The care perspective in healthcare ethics. In: Davis

Tschudin

De Raeve

(eds) Essentials of teaching and learning in nursing ethics: perspectives and methods. Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier, 2006, pp. 135–162.

35.

Feo

Kitson

. Promoting patient-centred fundamental care in acute healthcare systems. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 57: 1–11.

36.

Broderick

Coffey

. Person-centred care in nursing documentation. Int J Older People Nurs 2013; 8(4): 309–318.

37.

Dorvil

. The secrets to successful nurse bedside shift report implementation and sustainability. Nurs Manage 2018; 49(6): 20–25.

38.

Nygaard

Haugdahl

Brinchmann

, et al. Information concerning ICU patients’ families in the handover-the clinicians’ «game of whispers»: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29(19–20): 3822–3834.

39.

Collins

Cato

Albers

, et al. Relationship between nursing documentation and patients’ mortality. Am J Crit Care 2013; 22(4): 306–313.

40.

De Groot

Triemstra

Paans

, et al. Quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation: a systematic review of systematic reviews. J Adv Nurs 2019; 75(7): 1379–1393.

41.

Allen

. The invisible work of nurses: hospitals, organisation and healthcare. London: Routledge, 2015.

42.

The Danish Agency for Patient Complaints. Danish agency for patient complaints in numbers 2015-2020, 2020, https://stpk.dk/om-os/stpk-i-tal/

43.

Sandelowski

. When a cigar is not just a cigar: alternative takes on data and data analysis. Res Nurs Health 2011; 34(4): 342–352.