Nurses’ involvement in end-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care units

Abstract

Background:

End-of-life decision-making for terminally ill neonates raises important legal and ethical issues. In Greece, no recent data on nurses’ attitudes and involvement in end-of-life decisions are available.

Research question/aim:

To investigate neonatal nurses’ attitudes and involvement in end-of-life decisions and the relation to their socio-demographic and work-related background data.

Research design:

A survey was carried out in 28 neonatal intensive care units between September 2018 and January 2019. A structured questionnaire was distributed by post.

Participants and research context:

The questionnaire was answered anonymously by 312 nurses (response rate, 71.1%) and returned to the investigators.

Ethical considerations:

The study was approved by the Bioethics and Research Committee of Aretaieio Hospital in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Findings:

Nurses more often reported involvement in various end-of-life decisions, such as continuation of treatment without adding further therapeutic interventions for terminally ill neonates, while less reported were mechanical ventilation withdrawal and drug administration to end life. Nurses with a high attitude score, reflecting a more quality-of-life approach, were more likely to be involved in setting limits to intensive care. α low score was consistent with life preservation. Nurses’ religiousness (p = 0.097), parenthood (p = 0.093), involvement in daily practice (p = 0.03), and position on the existing legal framework (p < 0.002) influenced their attitude score.

Discussion:

The likelihood of nurses to support interventions in neonates with poor prognosis in neonatal intensive care units was related to their attitudes. After adjusting for potential confounders, the most important predictors for nurses’ attitudes were parenthood, involvement in daily practice, and position supporting current legislation reform.

Conclusion:

Variability in involvement in end-of-life decisions among nurses exists on a national level.

Keywords

Attitude end-of-life decisions neonatal intensive care unit neonates nurses withdrawing treatment withholding treatment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kilcullen

Ireland

. Palliative care in the neonatal unit: neonatal nursing staff perceptions of facilitators and barriers in a regional tertiary nursery. BMC Palliat Care 2017; 16: 32.

Shitaya

Nakamura

Sato

. How Japanese nurses participate in decision making: infants with congenital life-threatening conditions. Int J Nurs Pract 2018; 24(Suppl. 1): e12652.

Gallagher

Marlow

Edgley

, et al. The attitudes of neonatal nurses towards extremely preterm infants. J Adv Nurs 2012; 68(8): 1768–1779.

Johnson

Fawke

Hennessy

, et al. Neurodevelopmental disability through 11 years of age in children born before 26 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 2009; 124(2): e249–e257.

Stephens

Tucker

Vohr

. Special health care needs of infants born at the limits of viability. Pediatrics 2010; 125(6): 1152–1158.

Benbenishty

Ganz

Lippert

, et al. Nurse involvement in end-of-life decision making: the ETHICUS Study. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32(1): 129–132.

Cuttini

Casotto

de Vonderweid

, et al. Neonatal end-of-life decisions and bioethical perspectives. Early Hum Dev 2009; 85(10 Suppl.): S21–S25.

Moro

Kavanaugh

Okuno-Jones

, et al. Neonatal end-of-life care: a review of the research literature. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2006; 20: 262–273.

Michel

Colaizy

Klein

, et al. Causes and circumstances of death in a neonatal unit over 20 years. Pediatr Res 2018; 83(4): 829–833.

10.

Albers

Francke

de Veer

, et al. Attitudes of nursing staff towards involvement in medical end-of-life decisions: a national survey study. Patient Educ Couns 2014; 94(1): 4–9.

11.

Hellmann

Knighton

Lee

, et al. Neonatal deaths: prospective exploration of the causes and process of end-of-life decisions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2016; 101(2): F102–F107.

12.

Rebagliato

Cuttini

Broggin

, et al. Neonatal end-of-life decision making: physicians’ attitudes and relationship with self-reported practices in 10 European countries. JAMA 2000; 284: 2451–2459.

13.

Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Critical Care Decisions in fetal and neonatal medicine: ethical issues. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/neonatal-medicine (2006, accessed 6 January 2010).

14.

Erickson

. Bedside nurse involvement in end-of-life decision making: a brief review of the literature. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2013; 32(2): 65–68.

15.

Bilgen

Topuzoglu

Kuscu

, et al. End-of-life decisions in the newborn period: attitudes and practices of doctors and nurses. Turk J Pediatr 2009; 51(3): 248–256.

16.

Bucher

Klein

Hendriks

, et al. Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses. BMC Pediatr 2018; 18: 81.

17.

Inghelbrecht

Bilsen

Mortier

, et al. Nurses’ attitudes towards end-of-life decisions in medical practice: a nationwide study in Flanders, Belgium. Palliat Med 2009; 23(7): 649–658.

18.

Bendiane

Galinier

Favre

, et al. French district nurses’ opinions towards euthanasia, involvement in end-of-life care and nurse patient relationship: a national phone survey. J Med Ethics 2007; 33(12): 708–711.

19.

Cuttini

Nadai

Kaminski

, et al. End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians’ self-reported practices in seven European countries. EURONIC Study Group. Lancet 2000; 355: 2112–2118.

20.

Profit

Sharek

Amspoker

, et al. Burnout in the NICU setting and its relation to safety culture. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23(10): 806–813.

21.

Tawfik

Phibbs

Sexton

, et al. Factors associated with provider burnout in the NICU. Pediatrics 2017; 139(5): e20164134.

22.

Guimaraes

Rocha

Almeda

, et al. Ethics in neonatology: a look over Europe. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25(7): 984–991.

23.

Dombrecht

Deliens

Chambaere

, et al. Neonatologists and neonatal nurses have positive attitudes towards perinatal end-of-life decisions, a nationwide survey. Acta Paediatr 2020; 109(3): 494–504.

24.

Miljeteig

Markestad

Norheim

. Physicians’ use of guidelines and attitudes to withholding and withdrawing treatment for extremely premature neonates in Norway. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96(6): 825–829.

25.

Garten

Daehmlow

Reindl

, et al. End-of-life opioid administration on neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: nurses’ attitudes and practice. Eur J Pain 2011; 15(9): 958–965.

26.

Huang

Chen

Liu

, et al. The attitudes of neonatal professionals towards end-of-life decision-making for dying infants in Taiwan. J Med Ethics 2013; 39(6): 382–386.

27.

Daglas

Petousi

Poulios

. Ethical issues in NICUs: the attitude of Greek healthcare professionals towards the value of human life. Health Care Current Reviews 2017; 5: 1000210.

28.

Dagla

Petousi

Poulios

. Bioethical decisions in neonatal intensive care: neonatologists’ self-reported practices in Greek NICUs. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 3465.

29.

Chatziioannidis

Iliodromiti

Boutsikou

, et al. Physicians’ attitudes in relation to end-of-life decisions in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: a national multicenter survey. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21: 121.

30.

Cuttini

Kaminski

Saracci

, et al. The EURONIC Project: a European concerted action on information to parents and ethical decision-making in neonatal intensive care. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1997; 11(4): 461–474.

31.

DiMaggio

. SAS for epidemiologists: applications and methods. New York: Springer, 2013, p. xvii, 258 pp.

32.

SAS Institute. SAS home page, 2014, http://www.sas.com

33.

Heo

Kim

Faith

. Statistical power as a function of Cronbach alpha of instrument questionnaire items. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015; 15: 86.

34.

Schneider

Metze

Buhrer

, et al. End-of-life decisions 20 years after EURONIC: neonatologists’ self-reported practices, attitudes, and treatment choices in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. J Pediatr 2019; 207: 154–160.

35.

Provoost

Cools

Mortier

, et al. Medical end-of-life decisions in neonates and infants in Flanders. Lancet 2005; 365: 1315–1320.

36.

Guimaraes

Rocha

Bellieni

, et al. Rights of the newborn and end-of-life decisions. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25(Suppl. 1): 76–78.

37.

Lantos

. International and cross-cultural dimensions of treatment decisions for neonates. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 20(5): 368–372.

38.

Dombrecht

Cohen

Cools

, et al. Psychological support in end-of-life decision-making in neonatal intensive care units: full population survey among neonatologists and neonatal nurses. Palliat Med 2020; 34(3): 430–434.

39.

Abdel Razeq

. Physicians’ standpoints on end-of-life decisions at the neonatal intensive care units in Jordan. J Child Health Care 2019; 23(4): 579–595.

40.

Guimaraes

Sanchez-Luna

Bellieni

, et al. Ethical charter of Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011; 24(6): 855–858.

41.

Hinderer

. Reactions to patient death: the lived experience of critical care nurses. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2012; 31(4): 252–259.

42.

Ferrand

Lemaire

Regnier

, et al. Discrepancies between perceptions by physicians and nursing staff of intensive care unit end-of-life decisions. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2003; 167: 1310–1315.

43.

Browning

. Empowering family members in end-of-life care decision making in the intensive care unit. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2009; 28(1): 18–23.