Withdrawing and withholding treatment is an emotive issue, especially when it comes to infant patients who cannot reveal their own preferences. The Institute of Medical Ethics carried out a study exploring the perceptions of doctors and nurses involved in such decisions and found that nurses are reluctant to articulate their opinions. This results in practices taking place and decisions being made with which they are not always totally in agreement. Recommendations have been made for better preparation in ethical reasoning, improved communication and team effort.
Airedale NHSTrust v Bland. House of Lords judgement, 1993.
2.
Dyer, C.Scottish judges say court can decide in PVS cases. British Medical Journal1996; 312: 797-798.
3.
Dyer, C.Doctors could oppose child's right to die. British Medical Journal1995; 311:405.
4.
Toolis, K.Adeath for Thomas. The Guardian Weekend. February 3.1996.
5.
Dyer, C.Baby's doctors to ask for right to die. British Medical Journal1996; 312:797.
6.
Dyer C.Judge allows baby to die in peace. British Medical Journal1996; 312; 928.
7.
Sheldon, T.Dutch appeal court dismisses case against doctor. British Medical Journal1995; 311: 1322.
8.
Tin, W., Wariyar, U., Hey, E.Changing prognosis for babies of less than 28 weeks' gestation in the north of England between 1983 and 1994. British Medical Journal1997; 311:107-111.
9.
Silverman, W.A.Overtreatment of neonates? A personal retrospective . Pedia trics1992; 90: 971-976.
10.
Robb, I.H.Nursing Ethics. Cleveland, 1915.
11.
Richardson, J. , Webber, I.Ethicallssuesin Child Health Care. London: Mosby, 1995.
12.
Tschudin, V.Deciding ethically. A practical approach to nursing challenges. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1994.
13.
Jones, S.R.Ethics in Midwifery. London: Mosby , 1994.
14.
Burnard, P., Chapman, C.M.Professional and Ethicallssues in Nursing: The Code of Professional Conduct . Middlesex: Scutari, 1993.
15.
Watson, R. (ed.) Accountability in Nursing Practice. London: Chapman and Hall ,1995.
16.
Ukcc.The Scope of Professional Practice. London: UKCC, 1992.
17.
Rcm.The Midwife: Her legal status and her accountability. London: RCM, (Undated).
18.
McHaffie, H.E., Fowlie, P.W. Life, Death and Decisions: Doctors and nurses reflect on neonatal practice. Hale: Hochland and Hochland, 1996.
19.
Goldworth, A., Silverman, W., Stevenson, D.K., et al. (eds) Ethics and Perina tology. New York : Oxford Medical Publications, 1995 .
20.
Kuhse, H., Singer, R.Should the baby live? The problem ofhandicappedinfants. Aldershot: Gregg Revivals,1994.
21.
The Danish Council of Ethics.7thAnnual Report 1994. Debate Outline—Extreme Prematurify. Ethical aspects . Denmark: Thorup Grafik, 1995.
22.
McMillan, R.C., Engelhardt. H.T. Jr, Spicker, S.F. (eds.) Euthanasia and the Newborn. Holland: Reidel,1987.
23.
Loewy, E.H.Suffering as a consideration in ethical decision-making . Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics1992; 1: 2,135-146.
24.
Rostain, A.L. , Bhutani, V.Ethical dilemmas of neonatal-perinatal surgery . Clinics in Perinatology1989; 16:1, 275-302.
25.
McHaffie, H.E.The Care of Patients with HIV and AIDS: A survey of nurse education in the UK. Edinburgh: Institute of Medical Ethics Report, Department of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, 1993.
26.
General Medical Council.Tomorrow's Doctors. London: General Medical Council, 1993.
27.
Nightingale, F.Noteson nursing. In: Skeet, M., Nightingale, F. Notes on Nursing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1980.
