How American Nurses Association Code of Ethics informs genetic/genomic nursing

Abstract

Members of the Ethics and Public Policy Committee of the International Society of Nurses in Genetics prepared this article to assist nurses in interpreting the American Nurses Association (2015) Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements (Code) within the context of genetics/genomics. The Code explicates the nursing profession’s norms and responsibilities in managing ethical issues. The nearly ubiquitous application of genetic/genomic technologies in healthcare poses unique ethical challenges for nursing. Therefore, authors conducted literature searches that drew from various professional resources to elucidate implications of the code in genetic/genomic nursing practice, education, research, and public policy. We contend that the revised Code coupled with the application of genomic technologies to healthcare creates moral obligations for nurses to continually refresh their knowledge and capacities to translate genetic/genomic research into evidence-based practice, assure the ethical conduct of scientific inquiry, and continually develop or revise national/international guidelines that protect the rights of individuals and populations within the context of genetics/genomics. Thus, nurses have an ethical responsibility to remain knowledgeable about advances in genetics/genomics and incorporate emergent evidence into their work.

Keywords

Code of Ethics genetic/genomic nursing nursing education nursing practice nursing research public policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Nurses Association. Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Silver Spring, Moral distress: American Nurses Association, 2015, pp. 9, 28, 31, 43.

International Council of Nurses (ICN). The ICN code of ethics for nurses. Geneva: ICN, http://www.icn.ch/who-we-are/code-of-ethics-for-nurses/ (2012, accessed 22 May 2017).

United Nations. The millennium development goals report. New York: United Nations, http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ (2015, accessed 22 August, 2017).

World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ (2013, accessed 22 May 2017).

American Nurses Association (ANA) and International Society of Nurses in Genetics (ISONG). Genetics/genomics nursing: scope and standards of practice. 2nd ed. Springfield, Moral distress: ANA and ISONG, 2016, p. 62.

Wung

Hickey

Taylor

et al. Cardiovascular genomics. J Nurs Scholarsh 2013; 45(1): 60–68.

Dahlman

Ryden

Brodin

et al. Numerous genes in loci associated with body fat distribution are linked to adipose function. Diabetes 2016; 65(2): 433–437.

Lea

. Genetic and genomic healthcare: ethical issues of importance to nurses. OJIN: Online J Issue Nurs 2008; 13(1). DOI: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol13No01Man04.

Santos

Edwards

Floria-Santos

et al. Integration of genomics in cancer care. J Nurs Scholarsh 2013; 45(1): 43–51.

10.

Huang

Yang

Lin

et al. Transcriptome alterations of mitochondrial and coagulation function in schizophrenia by cortical sequencing analysis. BMC Genomics 2014; 15(Suppl 9): S6.

11.

US National Library of Medicine. Factor V Leiden thrombophilia: genetics home reference: your guide to understanding genetic conditions, https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/factor-v-leiden-thrombophilia (2016, accessed 22 May 2017).

12.

Iffland

Crino

. Sending mixed signals: the expanding role of molecular cascade mutations in malformations of cortical development and epilepsy. Epilepsy Curr 2016; 16(3): 158–163.

13.

Rutza

Eidenschenkb

Kieferc

et al. Post-translational regulation of RORγt: a therapeutic target for the modulation of interleukin-17-mediated responses in autoimmune diseases. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2016; 30: 1–17.

14.

Stoller

. Detecting alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016; 13(Suppl 4): S317–S325.

15.

Limon-Sztencel

Lipska-Ziętkiewicz

Chmara

et al. The algorithm for Alzheimer risk assessment based on APOE promoter polymorphisms. Alzheimers Res Ther 2016; 8(1): 19.

16.

Rialdi

Campisi

Zhao

et al. Topoisomerase 1 inhibition suppresses inflammatory genes and protects from death by inflammation. Science 2016; 352(6289): aad7993.

17.

Zhou

Yee

Seiser

et al. Variation in the glucose transporter gene SLC2A2 is associated with glycemic response to metformin. Nat Genet 2016; 48(9): 1055–1059.

18.

Tluczek

DeLuca

. Newborn screening: policy and practice issues for nurses. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2013; 42: 718–729.

19.

National Cancer Institute. Cervical cancer screening (PDQ^®)–Health professional version, http://www.cancer.gov/types/cervical/hp/cervical-screening-pdq (2016, accessed 22 May 2017).

20.

Beamer

Grant

Espenschied

et al. Reflex immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing of colorectal tumors for Lynch syndrome among US cancer programs and follow-up of abnormal results. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30(10): 1058–1063.

21.

Giardiello

Allen

Axibund

et al. Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1159–1179.

22.

McClain

Palomaki

Piper

et al. A rapid ACCE review of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 allele testing to inform warfarin dosing in adults at elevated risk for thrombotic events to avoid serious bleeding, http://www.acmg.net/docs/Resources/Warfarin_CYP_VKOR_ACCE_review_8.21.07.pdf?hkey=6e8df859-fbf5-4bea-b5e4-dc482181e558 (2007, accessed 22 May 2017).

23.

Tobias

Green

Coté

. AAP Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, AAP Committee on Drugs. Codeine: Time to say “no”. Pediatrics 2016; 138(4): e1–e7. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-2396.

24.

Dean

. Tamoxifen therapy and CYP2D6 genotype: medical summaries, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK247013/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK247013.pd (2016, accessed 22 May 2017).

25.

National Institutes of Health, US National Library of Medicine Dec 6, 2017. Genetics home reference. What is precision medicine? https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/precisionmedicine/definition (n.d., accessed 22 May 2017).

26.

Cutilli

Bennett

. Understanding the health literacy of America results of the National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Orthop Nurs 2009; 28: 27–34.

27.

Johnson

Case

Andrews

et al. Genomics: the perfect information-seeking research problem. J Health Commun 2005; 10: 323–329.

28.

Lea

Kaphingst

Bowen

et al. Communicating genetic and genomic information: health literacy and numeracy considerations. Public Health Genomics 2011; 14: 279–289.

29.

Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/gina.cfm (2008, accessed 22 May 2017).

30.

Andorno

. The right not to know: an autonomy based approach. J Med Ethics 2004; 30: 435–440.

31.

Berkman

Hull

. The “right not to know” in the genomic era: time to break from tradition? Am J Bioeth 2014; 14: 28–31.

32.

Hofmann

. Incidental findings of uncertain significance: to know or not to know—that is not the question. Biomed Central 2016; 17: 13.

33.

Loud

. Direct-to-consumer genetic and genomic testing: preparing nurse practitioners for genomic healthcare. J Nurse Pract 2010; 6: 585–594.

34.

Shamoo

Resnik

. Responsible conduct of research. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, p. 266.

35.

Patient Protection Affordable Care Act of 2010, https://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/comp2/F111-148.html (2010, accessed 22 May 2017).

36.

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ191/content-detail.html (1996, accessed 22 May 2017).

37.

Foley & Lardner LLP. Privacy issues in the sharing of genetic information, https://www.foley.com/files/Publication/7465587b-5df9-4f85-9969-68ce1b4c39af/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/88ba6035-c031-4ff4-b4e2-6ad15030b17d/PrivacyIssuesintheSharingofGeneticInformation.pdf (2014, accessed 22 May 2017).

38.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice, http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/BaccEssentials08.pdf (2008, accessed 22 May 2017).

39.

Consensus Panel on Genetic/Genomic Nursing Competencies. Essentials of genetic and genomic nursing: competencies, curricula guidelines, and outcome indicators. 2nd ed. Silver Spring, Moral distress: American Nurses Association, http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Careers/HealthProfessionalEducation/geneticscompetency.pdf (2009, accessed 22 May 2017).

40.

Greco

Tinley

Seibert

. The essential genetic and genomic competencies for nurses with graduate degrees. Silver Spring, Moral distress: American Nurses Association and International Society of Nurses in Genetics, https://www.genome.gov/pages/health/healthcareprovidersinfo/grad_gen_comp.pdf (2012, accessed 22 May 2017).

41.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials of master’s education in nursing, http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/MastersEssentials11.pdf (2011, accessed 22 May 2017).

42.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice, http://www.aacn.nche.edu/dnp/Essentials.pdf (2006, accessed 22 May 2017).

43.

American Nurses Credentialing Center. Adult-gerontology primary care nurse practitioner board certification examination: test content outline, https://www.nursingworld.org/∼4acbba/globalassets/certification/certification-specialty-pages/resources/test-content-outlines/adultgerontologyprimarycare-tco.pdf (2016, accessed 22 May 2017).

44.

American Nurses Credentialing Center. Family nurse practitioner board certification examination: test content outline, https://www.nursingworld.org/∼4acd24/globalassets/certification/certification-specialty-pages/resources/test-content-outlines/familynp-tco.pdf (2016, accessed 22 May 2017).

45.

Jenkins

Calzone

Caskey

et al. Methods of genomic competency integration in practice. J Nurs Scholarsh 2015; 47: 200–210.

46.

Cassells

Jenkins

Lea

et al. An ethical assessment framework for addressing global genetic issues in clinical practice. Oncol Nurs Forum 2003; 30: 383–390.

47.

Global Genetics and Genomics Community. Genomic healthcare simulations, http://g-3-c.org/en/ (n.d., accessed 22 May 2017).

48.

Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. P450 drug interaction table, http://medicine.iupui.edu/clinpharm/ddis/main-table/ (2015, accessed 22 May 2017).

49.

The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html (1979, accessed 22 May 2017).

50.

Ancheta

Battie

Richard

et al. The association between KIF6 single nucleotide polymorphism rs20455 and serum lipids in Filipino-American women. Nurs Res Pract 2014; 2014: 1–8.

51.

Bomotti

Smith

Zagel

et al. Epigenetic markers of renal function in African Americans. Nurs Res Pract 2013; 2013: 1–9.

52.

Brockie

Heinzelmann

Gill

. A framework to examine the role of epigenetics in health disparities among Native Americans. Nurs Res Pract 2013; 2013: 1–9.

53.

Genomic Nursing State of the Science Advisory Panel, Calzone

Jenkins

et al. A blueprint for genomic nursing science. J Nurs Scholarsh 2013; 45: 96–104.

54.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Protection of Human Subjects, 45 CFR 46, https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/ (2009, accessed 22 May 2017).

55.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects, https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/International_Ethical_Guidelines_for_Biomedical_Research_Involving_Human_Subjects.pdf

56.

Van Delden

JJM

Van der Graff

. Revised CIOMS international ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. J Am Med Assoc 2017; 317: 135–136.

57.

Rotimi

. Health disparities in the genomic era: the case for diversifying ethnic representation. Genome Med 2012; 4: 65.

58.

Easton

Pharoah

PDP

Antoniou

et al. Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2243–2257.

59.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Minority health, https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/minority-health (2016, accessed 22 May 2017).

60.

World Health Organization. Genomics and world health. Report of the Advisory Committee on Health Research, http://www.who.int/rpc/genomics_report.pdf (2002, accessed 22 May 2017).

61.

World Health Organization. Community genetics services. Report of a WHO consultation on community genetics in low and middle-income countries, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501149_eng.pdf?ua=1 (2010, accessed 22 May 2017).

62.

United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights, http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13177&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (1997, accessed 22 May 2017).

63.

Fullerton

Kneer

Burke

. Finding a place for genomics in health disparity research. Public Health Genomics 2012; 15: 156–163. DOI:10.1159/000334717.

64.

Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing. STTI organization fact sheet, http://www.nursingsociety.org/connect-engage/about-stti/sigma-theta-tau-international-organizational-fact-sheet (2016, accessed 22 May 2017).

65.

United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ (1948, accessed 22 May 2017).

66.

Koplan

Bond

Merson

et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet 2009; 373: 1993–1995.

67.

Katz

Kornblet

Arnold

et al. Defining health diplomacy: changing demands in the era of globalization. Milbank Q 2011; 89: 503–523.

68.

Marten

Hanefeld

Smith

. Power: the nexus of global health diplomacy? J Health Diplomacy 2014; 1. http://www.ghd-net.org/sites/default/files/marten_smith_hanefeld.pdf (2014, accessed 22 May 2017).

69.

Wilson

Harper

Tami-Maury

et al. Global health competencies for nurses in the Americas. J Prof Nurs 2012; 28: 213–222.

70.

Hunter

Wilson

Stanhope

et al. Global health diplomacy: an integrative review of the literature and implications for nursing. Nurs Outlook 2013; 61: 85–92.