Council for International Organizations of Medical Services (CIOMS). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects, http://www.cioms.ch/publications/layout_guide2002.pdf (2002, accessed 10 September 2013).
Indian Council of Medical Research. Ethical guidelines for biomedical research on human participants, http://icmr.nic.in/ethical_guidelines.pdf (2006, accessed 10 September 2013).
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html (1979, accessed 10 September 2013).
6.
NkwabongEKouamL. Episiotomies during deliveries of singletons in cephalic presentation: the incidence can be reduced. J Obstet Gynaecol India2012; 62
(6): 641–643.
7.
NagpalJSachdevaASengupta DharR. Widespread non-adherence to evidence-based maternity care guidelines: a population-based cluster randomised household survey. BJOG. Epub ahead of print 22 August 2014. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13054.
8.
PoirierSAyresL. Endings, secrets, and silences: overreading in narrative inquiry. Res Nurs Health1997; 20
(6): 551–557.
9.
MenashyF. Interrogating an omission: the absence of a rights-based approach to education in World Bank policy discourse. Discourse: Stud Cult Polit Educ2013; 34
(5): 749–764.
10.
TodorovaI. The said and the unsaid: approaches to narrative analysis. Cogn Brain Behav2007; 9
(2): 229–247.
11.
ReidRSusicDPathiranaS. The ethics of obtaining consent in labour for research. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol2011; 51
(6): 485–492.
12.
VernonGAlfirevicZWeeksA. Issues of informed consent for intrapartum trials: a suggested consent pathway from the experience of the Release trial [ISRCTN13204258]. Trials2006; 7: 13.
13.
CorbettCACallisterLC. Giving birth: the voices of women in Tamil Nadu, India. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs2012; 37
(5): 298–305.
14.
Van HollenC. Invoking vali: painful technologies of modern birth in South India. Med Anthropol Q2003; 17
(1): 49–77.
15.
PhippsHDe VriesBKuahS. When should women be recruited to intrapartum research projects? A retrospective review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2013; 92
(11): 1264–1270.
16.
KumarSMohanrajRRoseA. How “informed” is informed consent? Findings from a study in South India. Indian J Med Ethics2012; 9
(3): 180–186.
17.
DeCostaAD’SouzaNKrishnanS. Community based trials and informed consent in rural north India. J Med Ethics2004; 30
(3): 318–323.
18.
SeetharamSZanottiR. Patients’ perceptions on healthcare decision making in rural India: a qualitative study and ethical analysis. J Clin Ethics2009; 20
(2): 150–157.
NambiarAChristopherDJMammenJ. Informed consent among nursing students participating in biomedical research. Indian J Med Ethics2012; 9
(3): 186–189.
22.
JoglekarNSDeshpandeSSSahayS. Correlates of lower comprehension of informed consent among participants enrolled in a cohort study in Pune, India. Int Health2013; 5
(1): 64–71.
23.
KrogstadDJDiopSDialloA. Informed consent in international research: the rationale for different approaches. Am J Trop Med Hyg2010; 83
(4): 743–747.
24.
GaitondeR. Registration and monitoring of pregnant women in Tamil Nadu, India: a critique. Reprod Health Matters2012; 20
(39): 118–124.
25.
HanssenI. An intercultural nursing perspective on autonomy. Nurs Ethics2004; 11
(1): 28–41.
26.
PrattBVanCCongY. Perspectives from South and East Asia on clinical and research ethics: a literature review. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics2014; 9
(2): 52–67.
27.
RiessmanCK. Exporting ethics: a narrative about narrative research in South India. Health2005; 9
(4): 473–490.
28.
SanmukhaniJTripathiCB. Ethics in clinical research: the Indian perspective. Indian J Pharm Sci2011; 73
(2): 125–130.
29.
DoshiMSKulkarniSPGhiaCJ. Evaluation of factors that motivate participants to consent for non-therapeutic trials in India. J Med Ethics2013; 39
(6): 391–396.
