CoffeyMReidyAWormaldRWuXXWrightLCourtneyP.Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol1993;77:17–21.
2.
SheldrickJHSharpAJH.Glaucoma screening clinic in general practice: Prevalence of occult disease, and resource implication. Br J Gen Pract1994;44:561–5.
3.
ThyleforsBNegrelDPararajasegaramRDadzieKY.Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ1995; 73:115–21.
4.
EvansJR.Studies on medical and population subjects: No 57. Causes of blindness and partial sight in England and Wales 1990–1991.London: HMSO, 1995.
5.
GrantWMBurkeJF.Why do some people go blind from glaucoma?Ophthalmology1982;89:991–8.
QuigleyHAAddicksEMGreenWRMaumeneeAE.Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. II. The site of injury and susceptibility to damage. Arch Ophthalmol1981; 99:635–49.
8.
SommerATielschJMKarzJ.Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. Arch Ophthalmol1991;109:1090–5.
9.
WormaldRPLFosterA.Clinical and pathological features of chronic glaucoma in north-east Ghana. Eye1990;4:107–14.
10.
JayJLMurdochJR.The rate ofvisual field lossinuntreated primary open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol1993;77:176–8.
11.
WormaldRPLWrightLACourtneyPBeaumontBHainesAP.Visual problems in the elderly in the community and implications for services. BMJ1993;304:1226–9.
12.
WormaldRPLBasauriEWrightLAEvansJR.The Afro-Caribbean eye survey: Risk factors for glaucoma in a sample of African Caribbean people living in London. Eye1994; 8:315–20.
13.
MasonRPKosokoOWilsonMRNational survey of the prevalence and risk factors of glaucoma in St Lucia, West Indies. Part 1: Prevalence findings. Ophthalmology1989;96:1363–8.
14.
TielschJMSommerAKatzJ.The Baltimore eye survey. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. JAMA1991;266:369–74.
15.
KleinBEKKleinRSponselWEPrevalence of glaucoma: The Beaver Dam eye study. Ophthalmology1992;99:1499–504.
16.
LeskeMCConnellAMSSchachatAPHymanL.The Barbados eye study: Prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol1994;112:821–9.
17.
TielschJMKatzJSommerAQuigleyHAJavittJC.Family history and risk of primary open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol1994;112:69–73.
18.
TielschJMKatzJQuigleyHAJavittJCSommerA.Diabetes, intraocular pressure and primary open-angle glaucoma in the Baltimore eye survey. Ophthalmology1995;112:48–53.
19.
TielschJMKatzJSommerAQuigleyHAJavittJC.Hypertension, perfusion pressure'and primary open angle glaucoma. A population based assessment. Arch Ophthalmol1995;113:216–21.
20.
RaufAOngPSPearsonRVWormaldRPL.A pilot study into the prevalence of ophthalmic disease in the Indian population of Southall. J Roy Soc Med1994;87:78–9.
21.
CongdonNWangFTielschJM.Issues in the epidemiology and population-based screening of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol1992;36:411–23.
22.
SchumerRAPodosSM.The nerve of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol1994;112:37–44.
23.
EddyDMSandersLEEddyJF.The value of screening for glaucoma with tonometry. Surv Ophthalmol1983;28:194–205.
24.
WernerEBDranceSMSchulzerM.Trabeculectomy and the progression of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol1977;95:1374–7.
25.
HitchingsRAMigdalCSWormaldRPoinooswamyDFitzkeF.The primary treatment trial: Changes in the visual field analysis by computer-assisted perimetry. Eye1994; 8:117–20.
26.
TielschJMKatzJSinghKA population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening. Am J Epidemiol1991; 134:1102–10.
27.
QuigleyHA.Open angle glaucoma. Medical progress review article. N Engl J Med1993;328:1097–106.
28.
JayJL.Rational choice of therapy in primary open angle glaucoma. Eye1992;6:243–7.
29.
DielmansIVingerlingJRWolfsRCWHofmanAGrobbeeDEDe JongPTVM.The prevalence of POAG in a population based study in the Netherlands: Ophthalmology1994;101:1851–5.
30.
American Academy of Ophthalmology. Preferred practice pattern. Primary open angle glaucoma. 1992.
31.
TuckMWCrickRP.Screening(sic) for glaucoma: Age and sex of referrals and confirmed cases in England and Wales. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt1992;12:400–4.
32.
LaidlawDAHBloomPAHughesAOSparrowJMMar-MionVJ.The sight test fee: Effect on ophthalmology referrals and rate of glaucoma detection. BMJ1994;309:634–6.
33.
WuXWormaldRPLFitzkeFNagasubramanianSHitchingsRA.Laptop computer perimetry for glaucoma screening. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1991;32(suppl):810.
34.
QuigleyHAKatzJDerickRJGilbertDSommerA.An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fibre layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology1992;99:19–28.
35.
TuulonenAAiraksinenPJMontagnaANieminenH.Screening for glaucoma with a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Acta Ophthalmol1990;68:445–9.
36.
AlvarezEDamatoBEJayJLMacClureE.Comparative evaluation of oculokinetic perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol1988;72:258–62.
37.
VernonSAHenryDJJonesSJ.Calculating the predictive power of the Henson field screener in a population at risk of glaucomatous field loss. Br J Ophthalmol1990;74:220–2.
38.
CostagliolaCRussoVCameraAScibelliG.The Takagi automated tangent screen ATS-85 for the detection of glaucomatous patients. Ann Ophthalmol1991;23:18–20.
39.
GreveMChisholmIA.Comparison of the oculokinetic perimetry glaucoma screener with two types of visual field analyser. Can J Ophthalmol1993;28:201–6.