Abstract
Objectives
Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) is being considered as an additional cervical screening method in Ireland. As sample takers play a central role in cervical screening and their support would be essential to the successful delivery of any HPV self-sampling programme, this survey aimed to assess sample takers’ views on HPV self-sampling.
Methods
An anonymous, online survey of HPV sample takers registered with CervicalCheck was conducted. Survey questions focused on sample takers’ views on the introduction of HPV self-sampling in Ireland, advantages and disadvantages for them and the role sample takers might play in delivering self-sampling.
Results
Of the 200 sample takers who completed the survey, 175 (87.5%) were nurses and the remainder doctors. Two-thirds (67%, 95% confidence interval: 60.5–73.5%; n = 134) supported introducing HPV self-sampling, 9% (5.0–13.0%; n = 18) did not, and 24% (18.1–29.9%; n = 48) were unsure. The reasons respondents supported introducing HPV self-sampling included a potential to increase screening uptake and provide a better experience for participants. Those opposed were concerned self-sampling would represent a missed opportunity for clinical examination of the cervix, to counsel patients about screening, and discuss other health concerns, while a minority reported concerns about the accuracy of self-sampled tests. No clear differences in views were observed by professional role.
Conclusions
Most respondents supported HPV self-sampling as an additional cervical screening method, but some were concerned about the potential reduction in important clinical encounters and accuracy of self-sampled tests. The benefits and limitations of HPV self-sampling should be carefully considered before introducing any self-sampling programme in Ireland.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
