Comparing screening based on the NHS Health Check and Polypill Prevention Programmes in the primary prevention of heart attacks and strokes

Abstract

Objective

To compare the NHS Health Check Programme with the Polypill Prevention Programme in the primary prevention of heart attacks and strokes.

Design

Use of published data and methodology to produce flow charts of the two programmes to determine screening performance and heart attacks and strokes prevented.

Setting

The UK population.

Intervention

The NHS Health Check Programme using a QRISK score on people aged 40–74 to select those eligible for a statin is compared with the Polypill Prevention Programme in people aged 50 or more to select people for a combination of a statin and three low-dose blood pressure lowering agents. In both programmes, people had no history of heart attack or stroke.

Main outcome measures

In 1000 people, the number of heart attacks and strokes prevented in the two programmes.

Results

In the hypothetical perfect situation with 100% uptake and adherence to the screening protocol, in every 1000 persons, the NHS Health Check would prevent 287 cases of a heart attack or stroke in individuals who would gain on average about 4 years of life without a heart attack or stroke amounting to 1148 years in total, the precise gain depending on the extent of treatment for those with raised blood pressure, and 136 would be prescribed statins with no benefit. The corresponding figures for the Polypill Prevention Programme are 316 individuals who would, on average, gain 8 years of life without a heart attack or stroke, amounting to 2528 years in total, and 260 prescribed the polypill with no benefit. Based on published estimates of uptake and adherence in the NHS Health Check Programme, in practice only 24 cases per 1000 are currently benefitting instead of 287, amounting to 96 years gained without a heart attack or stroke.

Conclusions

The Polypill Prevention Programme is by design simpler with the potential of preventing many more heart attacks and strokes than the NHS Health Check Programme.

Keywords

Screening NHS Health Check polypill heart attacks strokes

Introduction

Screening in the primary prevention of future cardiovascular disease is currently based on performing periodic health checks among adults, based on clinical history, a limited physical examination including blood pressure measurements and a blood test to measure cholesterol, to derive a person's risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Such screening is conducted in several countries including the UK. The risk assessment was originally based on the results of the US Framingham Study¹ and later adapted using other data. UK primary care data were used to develop the multi-factor QRISK prediction estimator in the NHS Health Check Programme conducted in England for people who are aged 40 to 74.² In the NHS Health Check Programme, QRISK is used to estimate the risk of a cardiovascular disease event over the next 10 years.

Health Checks, which are the responsibility of local authorities, are conducted every 5 years, with some occurring within and some outside general practices. Persons with a 10-year cardiovascular disease risk of 10% or more are deemed screen positive. All individuals are offered advice on lifestyle with prescribing of any medication subsequently being left to GPs, and Public Health England advising that a statin is prescribed ‘where lifestyle modification has been ineffective or is inappropriate’. If the person's blood pressure is not thought to be raised, blood pressure lowering medication is not offered.

In the year 2000, recognising that age overwhelms all other predictors, a simpler method of screening was proposed in a patent application³ using age alone, without testing or physical examination. This was brought to wider attention in the BMJ in 2003^4–6 in what have become known as the ‘Polypill papers’.⁷

A Polypill Prevention Programme has been offered outside the NHS for over 10 years as a service accessible on www.polypill.com. The Polypill Prevention Programme is directly linked to risk reduction where people aged 50 and older, without contraindications, are offered a combined formulation of medicines: a polypill. This consists of a cholesterol-lowering statin and three low-dose blood pressure lowering medicines to lower both risk factors together regardless of their starting values. Randomised trials have demonstrated the value of the polypill versus usual treatment with few side effects.^8–12

The contrasting approaches of the NHS Health Check Programme and the Polypill Prevention Programme raise questions about the future of public health policy on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. First, assuming 100% uptake and adherence to both preventive programmes, how do they compare? Second, how does the NHS Health Check Programme perform in practice, where uptake and adherence are unlikely to be 100%, and how is this likely to compare with the Polypill Prevention Programme? Third, how should the benefits of the two approaches be quantified and compared? We here answer these questions using evidence published by others and building on our previous work.^4,13–16

In this study, we compare NHS Health Check screening with age-alone screening using a flow chart analysis applied to 1000 people in the population, an analysis not previously done, but the results apply to other multiple risk factor-based screening programmes for the primary prevention of heart attacks and strokes, similar to the NHS Health Check, that are being conducted in many parts of the world.

Methods and results

Published results were used to construct three flow diagrams to show the screening performance and preventive effect in 1000 persons in the population regardless of age, divided into those that have a future fatal or non-fatal heart attack or stroke over their lifetime (affected) and those that will not have either event (unaffected). One flow diagram is for the UK NHS Health Check Programme, and one is for the Polypill Prevention Programme (Figures 1 and 2, respectively). In both flow diagrams, it is taken that there is complete adherence to the respective protocols. The third flow diagram (Figure 3) is for the NHS Health Check, constructed based on results on uptake and statin use from a published audit of the programme.

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of the NHS Health Check Programme among 1000 people in the population with 100% uptake and adherence. ‘Clinical event prevented’ includes those delayed. DR: detection rate; FPR: false positive rate: CVD: cardiovascular disease.

Figure 2.

Flow diagram of the Polypill Prevention Programme among 1000 people in the population with 100% uptake and adherence. ‘Clinical event prevented’ includes those delayed. DR: detection rate; FPR: false positive rate.

Figure 3.

Flow diagram of the NHS Health Check Programme among 1000 people in the population taking account of the observed uptake and statin use. ‘Clinical event prevented’ includes those delayed. DR: detection rate; FPR: false positive rate: CVD: cardiovascular disease.

NHS Health Check Programme

About 1 in 3 people in the population (333 per 1000) will be affected by a heart attack or stroke over their lifetime and the remainder (667 per 1000) will be unaffected.¹⁴ The first step is identifying people aged 40–74 years as shown in Figure 1. Standard life-table analysis shows that about 98% of affected individuals (326 of 333) and about 51% of unaffected individuals (340 of 667) will be aged 40 or older¹⁷; the actual estimates will be only a little less with an upper limit of 74 years as specified in the NHS Health Check Programme (eligible people aged 40–74) because by age 74 almost everyone will be screen positive. The second step in the screening process is identifying those with a positive QRISK score, i.e. a 10-year cardiovascular disease risk greater than or equal to 10%. With 5-yearly assessments, using a 10% 10-year cardiovascular disease risk cut-off, the detection rate is 88% (proportion of individuals with a first cardiovascular disease event in the next 10 years with positive screening results) and the false positive rate is 40% (proportion of individuals who do not have a first cardiovascular disease event in the next 10 years with positive screening results). This yields 287 true positives (88% of 326) and 136 false positives (40% of 340). These estimates are based on the Framingham risk score¹³ which has similar performance to QRISK.¹⁸ The third, and final, step is prescribing a statin to QRISK positive individuals.

Figure 1 shows that in the NHS Health Check Programme all 287 true positives receive a statin and will, as a result, have a heart attack or stroke entirely prevented or delayed, since medication with a statin will have a preventive effect in all who take it, albeit with a variable preventive period adopting the holistic model described in Wald and Morris.¹⁴ The holistic model shows that, on average, a gain of 4 years of life without a heart attack or stroke would be achieved with a statin (see Appendix) amounting to 1148 person years gained. These estimates may be somewhat greater depending on the use of blood pressure lowering medications being prescribed in the NHS Health Check Programme if the blood pressure was considered to be high.

Figure 2 shows, in the same way as Figure 1, the results of the Polypill Prevention Programme, which uses age alone in selecting people for preventive medication. Among persons in the affected group shown in the Figure, standard life-table analysis^14,17 indicates that 95% of first heart attacks and stroke will be found in those aged 50 and over (not much less than the 98% found in those aged 40 and over), yielding 316 true positives. In the unaffected group, life-table analysis indicates that 39% of all people who do not have a first heart attack or stroke will be found among those aged 50 and over, yielding 260 false positives. All 576 individuals (true and false positives) are prescribed a polypill, including a statin and three low-dose blood pressure medicines, with 316 clinical events prevented or delayed, gaining, on average, 8 years of life without a heart attack or stroke¹⁴ amounting to 2528 person years gained, more than double the number in the NHS Health Check Programme.

Implementation of the NHS Health Check Programme

NHS Health Checks started in England in 2009. Figure 3 shows a flow diagram taking account of an audited 41% uptake¹⁹ and a 20% use of statins in QRISK positive individuals.¹⁶ A subsequent 2021 audit yielded lower uptake and adherence estimates.¹⁵ Using the estimates of 41% and 20%, respectively, out of 1000 people, 24 cases would be prevented (Figure 3) compared to 287 with full uptake and everyone with a positive QRISK receiving a statin (Figure 1), i.e. 92% fewer. The person years of life gained without a heart attack or stroke would be 96.

Comparison of the programmes

Table 1 shows the differences between the two screening programmes with 100% uptake and protocol adherence. In every 1000 people, the Polypill Programme prevents 29 more heart attacks and strokes (316 minus 287) than the NHS Health Check Programme with 124 more false positives (260 minus 136) of negligible clinical significance given the safety of the preventive medication and, importantly, no clinic visits or blood tests. But in practice, uptake and protocol adherence of the Health Check Programme is far from 100%. Despite the uptake in a Polypill Prevention Programme not being known, using the audit results of the NHS Health Check Programme indicates that uptake in a Polypill Programme would have to be only 8% (24/316, from Figures 2 and 3) to achieve a better outcome in terms of clinical events prevented.

Table 1.

Comparison of NHS Health Check Programme and Polypill Programme among 1000 people in the population with 100% uptake and adherence.

		NHS Health Check Programme	Polypill Prevention Programme
1.	(i) In every 1000 people: number of heart attacks or strokes prevented	287	316
	(ii) Receiving medication, who would or would not have had a heart attack or stroke	136	260
	(iii) Number of clinic visits	7000^a	0
2.	No. of screening steps	3 (age, QRISK, prescribe a statin)	1 (age only)
3.	Preventive medication	Statin with or without blood pressure lowering medication	Statin and low-dose blood pressure medication (Polypill)
	Years of life gained without a heart attack or stroke
	(i) Years per person	4^b	8
	(ii) Total	1148	2528
4.	Uptake and adherence	Very low	Unknown

1000 × 7 for seven 5-yearly ‘Health Checks’.

With statin only.

Discussion

This paper uses the NHS Health Check Programme as an example of a cardiovascular risk algorithm that has been shown to have a similar screening performance to others, including the Framingham algorithm.¹⁸ Our results, therefore, apply to other widely adopted risk algorithms. Consequently, the conclusions of our paper extend beyond UK practice.

The flow charts in Figures 1 and 2 show that with complete uptake and adherence in both programmes, the Polypill Prevention Programme prevents more heart attacks and strokes than the NHS Health Check Programme without requiring clinic visits or blood tests. Figure 3 shows that with the reported uptake of the NHS Health Check Programme and the number of people prescribed a statin the Programme has a very limited preventive effect. The analysis involved in the flow charts has the advantage that it is simple and transparent, based as it is on published results and methodology. Even in the hypothetical perfect situation, the Polypill Programme is more effective and likely to be much more effective in practice. Consideration needs to be given to replace the NHS Health Check Programme with an audited population-based Polypill Prevention Programme. In making such a switch in policy, several issues in regard to each programme need to be considered, as covered below.

NHS Health Check approach

The NHS Health Check Programme is a three-step screening programme. First, people are selected based on age (40–74). Then tests are performed to determine a person's 10-year risk of a cardiovascular disease event. This decreases the false positive rate, but also decreases the detection rate. Third, a clinical decision is made on whether a statin is prescribed, possibly only after attempting to reduce risk through diet and lifestyle, and separately, based on blood pressure measurements, a clinical decision may be made on whether a blood pressure lowering medication is prescribed. However, where a preventive intervention is safe and affordable, as is the case with statins and blood pressure lowering medications,^5,6,20 the balance should be in favour of a simple approach that increases detection and disease prevention, employing a policy that directly offers access to preventive medication.

Aside from the low uptake and adherence to the NHS Health Check Programme, there is another weakness. The aim of preventive medication should be to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease as much as possible, which is achieved by lowering blood pressure and LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol together, not just one or the other if either are thought to be abnormally high, and to do so regardless of the starting level because there is no practical blood pressure threshold below which there is no further reduction in risk.^21–24

A 10-year risk of a heart attack or stroke equal to or greater than a given percentage (say ≥ 10%) is too limited for assessing both risk and benefit in chronic disease prevention, where the risk of disease is lifelong and requires lifelong preventive intervention. A further consideration relates to missed preventable cases in the NHS Health Check Programme. If a person has a positive QRISK assessment (i.e. ≥10% 10-year risk), preventive medication is offered. Once started it will, presumably, be taken for the rest of that person's life. From about age 74 almost everyone will be QRISK screen positive. The effect of the NHS Health Check Programme will be to miss the opportunity to prevent some heart attacks and strokes at younger ages that could have been prevented with an age-alone policy. For example, a 60-year-old could have a negative assessment, but on an age-alone policy would be positive and eligible for preventive medication.

There is minimal benefit in starting preventive medication below age 50 as is the case in the NHS Health Check Programme. Selecting age 50 as the age a polypill is offered is a policy judgement that may vary from country to country depending on the age distribution of heart attacks and strokes, cost and affordability. This is because there are very few people below age 50 who have a positive QRISK (reflecting the fact that age is the most important determinant of risk), very few events occur between age 40 and 50, and the full effect on risk reduction from blood pressure and LDL cholesterol reduction is achieved after only about 3 years.⁵

In 2014, the NHS Health Check Programme lowered the 10-year cardiovascular risk threshold from 20% to 10%, but this led to little change in practice; the average calculated risk of all people who were started on statins was about 21% before the guideline was changed and about 20% after.¹⁶ This calls into question what the programme achieves and indicates that the policy was not followed.

In a survey of 1.4 million people registered with 248 UK general practices, 73% of individuals initiated on a statin did not have a QRISK score recorded at any time (37,215/50,940).²⁵ On this basis alone, it can be concluded that a multi-factor screening ‘tool’, such as QRISK, plays only a minor role in influencing the decision to start people on a statin.

Importantly the results in Figure 3 show that the Health Check Programme has a very small effect, with the unavoidable conclusion that it should be replaced by a more effective programme.

Polypill Prevention approach

Apart from already having had a cardiovascular event, the overriding influence on a person's future risk of a cardiovascular event is that person's age. From youth to old age, the risk of cardiovascular events doubles every 7–8 years.²⁶ Other risk factors, like blood pressure and LDL cholesterol, although causal and reversible, are poor predictors of disease.²⁷ It follows that in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, age alone can be used in a once-only screening enquiry. There is only a marginal improvement in screening performance over age alone from adding causal risk factors.¹³ A person's age is already available from that person's medical records. Age alone is the screening test that determines eligibility for preventive medication that can then be offered in the absence of specific medical contraindications. Indeed, while selection on age is a critical first screening test for almost all screening programmes, it is not recognised as such, but its importance is shown in the Figures as a critical step even in the NHS Health Check screening pathway.

Appropriately formulated with a statin and low-dose blood pressure medications, a polypill has a low incidence of side effects. In a crossover trial, there were no withdrawals due to side effects.²⁰ Comprehensive analysis on statins indicated side effects were rare.²⁸ The use of blood pressure medication at low doses in randomised trials showed a very low rate of side effects⁶ and a reduction of one third in headache²⁹ which was supported by a survey of Polypill participants in 2020 (https://www.polypill.com/Home/Headaches). Importantly, side effects are reversible on stopping treatment and vastly outweighed by the benefit. In the UK Polypill Prevention Programme less than 1% of the participants discontinued on account of side effects, all of which were minor, and not necessarily related to taking the Polypill. The safety profile and low cost of the preventive medication justifies accepting a simpler and more effective policy, even though it results in more people who would not have a heart attack or stroke receiving the medication.

High cost and potential harm are reasons to limit the offer of a medical intervention to screen-positive individuals selected based on precisely determined high-risk estimation. But this is not the case if prevention is inexpensive and safe as it is with a polypill, justifying the conclusion that screening can be based on age alone, with a starting age just before heart attacks and stroke become a significant disease burden in the population. In such a situation, prevention is better than prediction. Costs would be largely limited to producing the polypill and making it accessible to the public, not adopting an expensive complex protocol with repeated measurements every 5 years to estimate the risk of disease; the NHS Health Check has been shown to take typically 20–30 min for each assessment³⁰ and a report in 2015 estimated that the annual cost was £450million.³¹

A well-managed Polypill Prevention Programme conducted at scale would be an effective, low cost, safe medical intervention that would, to advantage, replace the NHS Health Check Programme. As well as the health benefits,¹⁴ the programme would be cost effective.³² Uptake and adherence are important. Figures 1 and 2 describe a hypothetical perfect situation with 100% uptake and medication adherence to each of the two programmes recognising that in practice this will be less. Figure 3 shows the practical effect of the NHS Health Check Programme. Comparable estimates for uptake and adherence are not available for a Polypill Prevention Programme because the programme in the UK is based on individuals being aware of the service and choosing to become a participant and, therefore, not representative of what would happen in the general population. However, the effectiveness of a Polypill Programme is likely to be significantly greater than the NHS Health Check Programme for three reasons. Firstly, the uptake and adherence in a Polypill Programme would only have to be as low as 8% to be better than the NHS Health Check Programme. Secondly, a Polypill Programme requires little or no inconvenience to people offered such a service through their family doctor or community pharmacy on reaching the age of 50. Thirdly, it has been shown, in several studies that are summarised in a meta-analysis of randomised trials, that polypills improve adherence to treatment over usual treatment.³³ In any event, monitoring uptake and adherence would be needed. We are aware of no other public health measure that would currently have as large an impact on the primary prevention of disease as the Polypill Prevention Programme.

Conclusion

The NHS Health Check Programme is less effective than the Polypill Prevention Programme in the primary prevention of heart attacks and strokes. Replacing the NHS Health Check Programme, and similar programmes around the world, with Polypill Prevention Programmes would secure significant health benefits to individuals and populations.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We thank Richard Smith and Jeff Aronson for their helpful comments on drafts of the paper.

Declaration of potential conflicting interests

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: NW is a Director of Polypill Ltd which runs the UK Polypill Prevention Programme. ADH is a member of the Advisory Group for the UK Research and Innovation's Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund ‘Accelerating Detection of Disease’ challenge, and a co-opted member of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Guideline update group for Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification, CG181.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Nicholas J. Wald

Stephen H. Vale

Jonathan P. Bestwick

Appendix

References

Anderson

Odell

Wilson

, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J 1991; 121: 293–298.

Hippisley-Cox

Coupland

Vinogradova

, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2. Br Med J 2008; 336: 1475–1482.

Wald

Law

. Formulation for the prevention of cardiovascular disease . Patent Application Nos GB 0100548.7 and GB008791.6. Priority date 10th April 2000.

Wald

Law

. A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80%. Br Med J 2003; 326: 1419.

Law

Wald

Rudnicka

. Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J 2003; 326: 1423.

Law

Wald

Morris

, et al. Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials. Br Med J 2003; 326: 1427.

Rodgers

Smith

. The polypill and medicines access: two decades and counting. BMJ (Clin Res ed.) 2023; 382: 1847.

Roshandel

Khoshnia

Poustchi

, et al. Effectiveness of polypill for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (PolyIran): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet (London, England) 2019; 394: 672–683.

Muñoz

Uzoije

Reynolds

, et al. Polypill for cardiovascular disease prevention in an underserved population. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 1114–1123.

10.

Yusuf

Joseph

Dans

, et al. Polypill with or without aspirin in persons without cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 216–228.

11.

Castellano

Pocock

Bhatt

, et al. Polypill strategy in secondary cardiovascular prevention. N Engl J Med 2022; 387: 967–977.

12.

Huffman

Xavier

Perel

. Uses of polypills for cardiovascular disease and evidence to date. Lancet 2017; 389: 1055–1065.

13.

Wald

Simmonds

Morris

. Screening for future cardiovascular disease using age alone compared with multiple risk factors and age. PLoS One 2011; 6: e18742.

14.

Wald

Morris

. Quantifying the health benefits of chronic disease prevention: a fresh approach using cardiovascular disease as an example. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29: 605–612.

15.

Robson

Garriga

Coupland

, et al. NHS Health Checks: an observational study of equity and outcomes 2009-2017. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract 2021; 71: e701–e710.

16.

Patel

Barnard

Thompson

, et al. Evaluation of the uptake and delivery of the NHS Health Check programme in England, using primary care data from 9.5 million people: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e042963.

17.

Wald

Luteijn

Morris

. Starting the polypill: the use of a single age cut-off in males and females. J Med Screen 2017; 24: 50–53.

18.

Simmonds

Wald

. Risk estimation versus screening performance: a comparison of six risk algorithms for cardiovascular disease. J Med Screen 2012; 19: 201–205.

19.

NHS Health Check Programme, Patients Recorded as Attending and Not Attending, 2012-13 to 2017-18 - NHS Digital, https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-health-check-programme/2012-13-to-2017-18 (accessed 25 September 2023).

20.

Wald

Morris

Wald

. Randomized polypill crossover trial in people aged 50 and over. PLoS One 2012; 7: e41297.

21.

Law

Wald

. Risk factor thresholds: their existence under scrutiny. Br Med J 2002; 324: 1570–1576.

22.

Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903–1913.

23.

The Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Triallists’. Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis. Lancet 2021; 397: 1625–1636.

24.

Law

Morris

Wald

. Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. Br Med J 2009; 338: b1665.

25.

Finnikin

Ryan

Marshall

. Statin initiations and QRISK2 scoring in UK general practice: a THIN database study. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract 2017; 67: e881–e887.

26.

Law

Wald

Morris

. Lowering blood pressure to prevent myocardial infarction and stroke: a new preventive strategy. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7: 1–94.

27.

Wald

Hackshaw

Frost

. When can a risk factor be used as a worthwhile screening test? Br Med J 1999; 319: 1562–1565.

28.

Collins

Reith

Emberson

, et al. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet 2016; 388: 2532–2561.

29.

Law

Morris

Jordan

, et al. Headaches and the treatment of blood pressure: results from a meta-analysis of 94 randomized placebo-controlled trials with 24,000 participants. Circulation 2005; 112: 2301–2306.

30.

Robson

Dostal

Madurasinghe

, et al. The NHS Health Check Programme: implementation in east London 2009-2011. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e007578.

31.

Capewell

McCartney

Holland

. NHS Health Checks–a naked emperor? J. Public Health (Oxf) 2015; 37: 187–192.

32.

Wald

Luteijn

Morris

, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of the polypill in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke. Eur J Epidemiol 2016; 31: 415–426.

33.

Memon

Bai

Simran

, et al. Effect of the polypill on adherence and prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients with or at high risk of cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cureus 2023; 15: e34134.