de KoningHJvan OortmarssenGJvan IneveldBMBreast cancer screening: Its impact on clinical medicine. Br J Cancer1990;61:292–7.
2.
HakamaM. Design of the Finnish breast cancer screening study. In: HakamaMMillerAB, eds. Screening for breast cancer. Toronto: Hans Huber Publishers, 1988: 59–62.
3.
HakamaMElovainioLKajantieRBreast cancer screening as public health policy in Finland. Br J Cancer1991;64:962–4.
4.
ForrestAP.Screening and breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst1990;82:1525–6.
5.
SinJPSt LegerAS.Interventions to increase breast screening uptake: Do they make any difference?J Med Screen1999;6:170–81.
6.
OlssonSAnderssonIKarlbergIImplementation of service screening with mammography in Sweden: From pilot study to nationwide programme. J Med Screen2000;7:14–8.
7.
BeemsterboerPMde KoningHJLoomanCWMammography requests in general practice during the introduction of nationwide breast cancer screening, 1988–1995. Eur J Cancer1999;35:450–4.
8.
van LeidenHAvan Gessel-DabekaussenAAvan der MaasPJTrends in mammography 1991–96 and the impact of nationwide screening in the Netherlands. J Med Screen1999;6:94–8.
9.
AutierPShannounFScharpantgenAA breast cancer screening programme operating in a liberal health care system: The Luxembourg Mammography Programme, 1992–1997. Int J Cancer2002;97:828–32.
10.
LacourAMamelleNArnoldFMass screening programmes for breast cancer in France: Comparative evaluation. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)1997;26:470–83 (in French).
11.
SeradourBAllemandHSchafferP. French screening programme of breast cancer: Results from five districts (1989-1994). Bull Cancer1997;84:822–8 (in French).
12.
AlcarazMLluchAMirandaJStudy of non-participation in the breast cancer screening programme in the city of Valencia (Spain). Gac Sanit2002;16:230–5 (in Spanish).
13.
GarstinIWHKaufmanZMichellMJSide-effects of screening. Eur J Cancer1993;29A:2150–2.
14.
Ballard-BarbashRKlabundeCPaciEBreast cancer screening in 21 countries: Delivery of services, notification of results and outcomes ascertainment. Eur J Cancer Prev1999;8:417–26.
15.
GiorgiDGiordanoLPaciEOrganisation and epidemiologic evaluation of a mammography screening programme. Attualità In Senologia1999;1:1–15 (in Italian).
16.
NHS Breast Screening Programme. Breast screening programme. Annual review 2002.Sheffield: NHS Breast Screening Programme, 2002.
The Romagna Cancer Registry and Collaborators. Breast carcinoma stage in relation to time interval since last mammography. Cancer1997;80:1432–7.
19.
BlanksRGMossSMPatnikJ. Results from the UK NHS breast screening programme 1994–1999. J Med Screen2000;7:195–8.
20.
FracheboudJde KoningHJBeemsterboerPMNationwide breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: Results of initial and subsequent screening 1990–1995. Int J Cancer1998;75:694–8.
21.
American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for staging of cancer. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1992: 149–54.
22.
ZanettiRCrosignaniPRossoS, eds. Cancer in Italy. Incidence data from cancer registries. Second volume: 1988–1992.Rome: II Pensiero Scientifico Editore, 1997: 258–87.
23.
MorrisJAGardnerMJ.Calculating confidence intervals for relative risks (odds ratios) and standardised ratios and rates. BMJ1988;296:1313–6.
24.
SicklesEA.Mammography screening and the self-referred woman. Radiology1988, 166:271–3.
25.
GiordanoLGiorgiDFasoloGBreast cancer screening: Characteristics and results of the Italian programmes in the Italian Group for Planning and Evaluating Breast Cancer Screening Programmes (GISMa]. Tumori1996;82:31–7.
26.
WaitSSchafferPSeradourBOpportunistic screening of breast cancer in France. Bull Cancer1997;84:619–24 (in French).
27.
FauxAMLawrenceGMWheatonMESlippage in the NHS breast screening programme: An assessment of whether a three year screening round is being achieved. J Med Screen1998;5:88–91.
28.
GiorgiDPaciEZappaMBreast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: Can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?J Epidemiol Community Health1994;48:471–5.
29.
WhitehouseGHLeinsterSJAl-SumidaieAMAn analysis of referral patterns from a breast screening unit. Clin Radiol1986;37:555–9.
30.
BainesCJToTWallC. Women's attitudes to screening after participation in the National Breast Screening Study: A questionnaire survey. Cancer1990;65:1663–9.
31.
ReynoldsHEJacksonVP.Self-referred mammography patients: Analysis of patients' characteristics. Am J Roentgenol1991;157:481–4.
32.
SeidmanHGelbSKSilverbergESurvival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. CA1987;37:258–90.
33.
TaplinSAndermanCGrothausL. Breast cancer risk and participation in mammographic screening. Am J Publ Health1989;79:1494–8.
34.
SchairerCLubinJTroisiRMenopausal estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and breast cancer risk. JAMA2000;283:485–91.
35.
CarterCLCorleDKMicozziMSA prospective study of the development of breast cancer in 16,692 women with benign breast disease. Am J Epidemiol1988;128:467–77.
36.
DuffySWRobertsMMEltonRA.Risk factors for breast cancer: Relevance to screening. J Epidemiol Community Health1983;37:127–31.
37.
LondonSJConnollyJLSchnittSJA prospective study of benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. JAMA1992;267:941–4.
38.
McCaulKDBranstetterADSchroederDMWhat is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review. Health Psychol1996;15:423–9.
39.
ZapkaJGStoddardAMCostanzaMEBreast cancer screening by mammography: Utilization and associated factors. Am J Publ Health1989;79:1499–502.
40.
HolliKIsoloJCuzickJ. Low biologic aggressiveness in breast cancer in women using hormone replacement therapy. J Clin Oncol1998;16:3115–20.