This paper presents experimentally determined compression sets and compression behaviour of two closed-cell, crosslinked foam materials; ZOTEK N B50 (Nylon 6) and ZOTEK N A30 (nylon/polyolefin alloy). This work forms the basis of future investigations into the post-impact behaviour of these foams.
Compression set performance was measured at 25.0, 37.5 and 50.0% strain at nine temperatures ranging from −5 to 90 °C. Compression tests at constant strain rates were conducted at four temperatures between 23 to 90 °C. Finally compression tests at 23 °C were repeated at four strain rates between 0.3 and 550 hr−1 to determine strain rate dependency. The Nagy and Williams-Landel-Ferry scaling factor for strain rate and temperature were applied to the experimental results and equations were derived which allowed the performance of the two polyamide based foams to be interpolated over the strain rate and temperature range of study. The required material properties of interest of the base polymers have been assessed and are presented and discussed in relation to the performance of the foam materials.
MillsN.J., Polymer Foams Handbook, Engineering and Biomechanics Applications and Design Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 7, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007.
2.
GibsonL.J., and AshbyF., Cellular Solids, Structures and Properties, 2nd edition, Pergammon Press, Oxford, 1999.
3.
KraynikA.M., and WarrenW.E., Low Density Cellular Plastics, Physical Basis of Behaviour, 1st Edition, Chapter 7 - The Elastic Behaviour of Low-Density Cellular Plastics, Chapman and Hall, 1994.
4.
MillsN.J., StampfliR., MaroneF., and BruhwilerP.A., Finite Element Micromechanics Model of Impact Compression of Closed-Cell Polymer Foams, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 46 (2009) 667–697.
5.
MillsN.J., and ZhuH.X., The High Strain Compression of Closed-Cell Polymer Foams. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 47 (1999) 669–695.
6.
MillsN.J., and HwangA.M.H., The Multiple - Impact Performance of High - Density Polyethylene Foam, Cellular Polymers, 9 (1989), 259–276.
7.
Rodriguez-PerezM.A., Diez-GutierrezS., De SajaJ.A., The recovery behaviour of crosslinked closed cell polyolefin foams, Polymer Engineering and Science, 38 (1998), 831–837.
8.
AshbyM.F., and JonesD.R.H., Engineering Materials 2 – An Introduction to Microsctructures, Processing & Design, 2nd edition, Butterworth and Heinemann, 1998.
BS 2782-3 METHODS 320A TO 320F, 1976 Incorporating Amendment No.1 Plastics Part 3, Mechanical Properties - Methods 320A to 320F, Tensile Strength, Elongation and Elastic Modulus.
11.
GrecoR., NicodemoL., and NicolaisL., The Glass Transition of Nylon 6, Macromolecules, 9(4) (1976), 686–687.
12.
MillsN.J., Plastics Microstructure, Properties and Applications, Edward Arnold, 1986.
13.
ParkK.W., KimG.H., and ChowdhuryS.R., Improvement of Compression set Property of Ethylene Acetate Copolymer/Ethylene-1-Butene Copolymer/Organoclay Nanocomposite Foams, Polymer Engineering and Science, (June 2008), 1183.
14.
SreejaT.D., and KuttyS.K.N., Studies on Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber/Reclaimed Rubber Blends, Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 34 (2002), 45.
15.
JhlhamI.S., and MaitaI.J., Testing and Evaluation of rubber-base Composites Reinforced with Silica Sand, Journal of Composite Materials, 40 (2006), 2099.
16.
NayakN.C., and TripathyD.K., Studies on Composites Based on Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber and High styrene Resin, Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 33 (2001), 179.
17.
BacciD., MarchiniR., and ScrivaniM.T., Peroxide Crosslinking of Ziegler Natta Thermoplastic Polyolefins, Polymer Engineering and Science, 44 (2004), 131.
18.
CoonsJ.E., McKayM.D., and HamadaM.S., A Bayesian Analysis of the Compression Set and Stress-Strain Behaviour in a Thermally Aged Silicone Foam, Polymer Degradation and Stability, (2006), 1824.
19.
NeffR.A., and MarsalkoT.M., Roles of Convention Polyol and Isocyanate in Humid Aging and Durability of Molded seating Foam, Journal of Cellular Plastics35 (1999), 492.
20.
BS EN ISO 1856, 2001 Incorporating Amendments No 1, Flexible Cellular Polymeric Materials – Determination of Compression Set.
21.
ASTM D395-03, 2008Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property Compression Set
22.
MillsN.J., and GilchristA., Creep and Recovery of Polyolefin Foams – Deformation Mechanisms, Journal of Cellular Plastics, 33 (1997), 264–292.
23.
BS EN ISO 1923, 1995Cellular Plastics and Rubbers – Determination of Linear Dimensions
24.
BS EN ISO 845, 1995Incorporating Amendments No.1 Cellular Plastics and Rubbers- Determination of Apparent (Bulk) Density.
25.
IzzardV.G., BradsellC.H., HadaviniaH., MorrisV.J., FootP.J.S., and WittenN., Investigation of the Compression Recovery Properties of Polyamide-6 Cellular Solid Over the Temperature Range of −5oC to 90oC, Key Engineering Materials417-418 (2010), 933–936.
26.
SYSTAT User Manual, TableCurve 3D, Automated Surface Fitting and Equation Discovery Version 4.0 for Windows, 2002.
27.
BS EN 3386-1, 1998Polymeric Materials, Cellular Flexible Determination of stress-strain Characteristics in Compression, Low Density Material.
28.
ZhangJ., KikuchiN., LiV., YeesA., and NusholtzG., Constitutive Modeling of Polymeric Foam Material Subjected to Dynamic Crash Loading, Int. J. Impact Engineering21 (1998), 369–386.
29.
NagyA., KoW.L., and LindholmU.S., Mechanical Behaviour of Foamed Materials under Dynamic Compression. J. Cellular Plastics, 10, (1964), 127–134
30.
ManoJ.F., and VianaJ.C., Effects at the Strain Rate and Temperature in Stress Strain Tests, Study of the Glass Transition of a Polymide – 6, Polymer Testing, 20 (2001), 937–943.
