Thin-film composite (TFC) nanofiltration (NF) membranes were developed by terephthaloyl chloride (TPC) crosslinked the hydroxyl ended groups of hyperbranched polyester (HPE) on polyacrylonitrile (PAN) support. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) indicated that a thin layer of crosslinked HPE molecules were deposited on PAN porous membrane surface successfully. The preparation conditions were also optimized. The separation performance of PAN-HPE-TPC NF membranes are mainly related with the concentration of monomer in the aqueous phase rather than that in the organic phase. Water permeability and salts rejections of the membranes were measured. The flux and rejection of these NF membranes for Na2SO4 (1 g/L) reached 11.43 L/m2h and 96.5% under 0.6 MPa, respectively. At the same time, the nanofiltration properties were compared with other membranes prepared with hyperbranched polymers. All NF membranes prepared with hyperbranched polymers showed relative high permeate flux.
LuX., BianX., and ShiL., Preparation and characterization of NF composite membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 210 (2002), 3–11.
2.
RaoA.P., JoshiS.V., TrivediJ.J., DevmurariC.V., and ShahV.J., Structure-performance correlation of polyamide thin film composite membranes: effect of coating conditions on film formation, J. Membr. Sci., 211(1) (2003), 13–24.
3.
AhmadA.L., and OoiB.S., Properties-performance of thin film composites membrane: study on trimesoyl chloride content and polymerization time, J. Membr. Sci., 255(1-2) (2005), 67–77.
4.
SunH., ChenG., HuangR., and GaoC., A novel composite nanofiltration (NF) membrane prepared from glycolchitin/poly(acrylonitrile) (PAN) by epichlorohydrin crosslinking, J. Membr. Sci., 297 (2007), 51–58.
5.
SahaN.K., and JoshiS.V., Performance evaluation of thin film composite polyamide nanofiltration membrane with variation in monomer type, J. Membr. Sci., 342 (2009), 60–69.
6.
RahimpourA., JahanshahiM., MortazavianN., and MadaeniS.S., Preparation and characterization of asymmetric polyethersulfone and thin-film composite polyamide nanofiltration membranes for water softening, Applied. Surface Sci., 256 (2010), 1657–1663.
7.
ImmelmanE., SandersonR.D., JacobsE.P., and Van ReenenA.J., Poly(vinyl alcohol) gel sublayers for reverse osmosis membranes, I. Insolubilization by acid-catalyzed dehydration, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 50 (1993), 1031–1034.
8.
LiL.C., WangB.G., TanH.M., ChenT.L., and XuJ.P., A novel nanofiltration membrane prepared with PAMAM and TMC by in situ interfacial polymerization on PEK-C ultrafiltration membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 269(1-2) (2006), 84–93.
9.
BuchP.R., and ReddyA.V.R., Synthesis, characterization and thermal properties of soluble aromatic poly (amide imide)s, Polymer, 46 (2005), 5524–5532.
10.
LuY., SuzukiT., ZhangW., MooreJ.S., and MariasB.J., Nanofiltration membranes based on rigid star amphiphiles, Chem. Mater., 19 (2007), 3194–3204.
11.
GaoC., and YanD., Hyperbranched polymers: from synthesis to applications, Prog. Polym. Sci., 29 (2004), 183–275.
12.
ZhaoY.H., ZhuB.K., MaX.T., and XuY.Y., Porous membranes modified by hyperbranched polymers: Preparation and characterization of PVDF membrane using hyperbranched polyglycerol as additive, J. Membr. Sci., 290 (2007), 222–229.
13.
ZhaoY.H., ZhuB.K., KongL., and XuY.Y., Improving hydrophilicity and protein-resistance of poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes by blending amphiphilic hyperbranched-star polymer, Langmuir, 23 (2007), 5779–5786.
14.
ZhaoY.H., QianY.L., PandD.X., ZhuB.K., and XuY.Y., Porous membranes modified by hyperbranched polymers II. Effect of the arm length of amphiphilic hyperbranched-star polymers in the hydrophilicity and protein resistance of poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 304 (2007), 138–147.
15.
ChiangY.C., HsubY.Z., RuaanR.C., ChuangC.J., and TungK.L., Nanofiltration membranes synthesized from hyperbranched polyethyleneimine, J. Membr. Sci., 326 (2009), 19–26.
16.
WeiX.Z., ZhuL.P., DengH.Y., XuY.Y., ZhuB.K., and HuangZ.M., New type of nanofiltration membrane based on crosslinked hyperbranched polymers, J. Membr. Sci., 323 (2008), 278–287.
17.
YuJ.Z., XuY.Y., ZhuL.P., WeiX.Z., and ZhuB.K., Preparation and characterization of low- pressure nanofiltration membranes based on crosslinked hyperbranched polyester, Acta. Polym. Sinica., 7 (2009), 707–711.
18.
TangB., HuoZ., and WuP., Study on a novel polyester composite nanofiltration membrane by interfacial polymerization of triethanolamine (TEOA) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC)I. Preparation, characterization and nanofiltration properties test of membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 320 (2008), 198–205.
19.
KrantzW.B., and ChaiG.Y., Formation and characterization of polyamide membranes via interfacial polymerization, J. Membr. Sci., 93 (1994), 175–192.
20.
RileyR.L., LonsdaleH.K., and LyonsC.R., Composite membranes for seawater desalination by reverse osmosis, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 15 (1971), 1267–1276.
21.
ChenS.H., ChangD.J., LiouM.R., HsuC.S., LinS.S., Preparation and separation properties of polyamide nanofiltration membrane, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 83(5) (2002), 1112–1118.
22.
MohammadA.W., HilalN., and SemanM.N.A., A study on producing composite nanofiltration membranes with optimized properties, Desalination, 158(1-3) (2003), 73–78.
23.
SchaepJ., Vander BruggenB., VandecasteeleC., and WilmsD., Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration, Sep. Purif. Technol., 14(1-3) (1998), 155–162.
24.
QiuS., WuL., ZhangL., ChenH., and GaoC., Effect of process conditions of interfacial polymerization on performance of reverse osmosis composite membrane, J. Chem. Ind. Eng. (China), 59(8) (2008), 2027–2034.
25.
DaiY., JianX., ZhangS., and GuiverM.D., Thin film composite (TFC) membranes with improved thermal stability from sulfonated poly(phthalazinone ether sulfone ketone) (SPPESK), J. Membr. Sci., 207 (2002), 189–197.
26.
YuS., and GaoC., Research on performance of sulfonated polyethersulfone composite nanofiltration membrane, Technol. Water. Treatment, 26(2) (2000), 63–66.
27.
DuR., and ZhaoJ., Properties of poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)/polysulfone positively charged composite nanofiltration membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 239 (2004), 183–188.
28.
PetersenR.J., Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 83(1) (1993), 81–150.
29.
NightingaleE.R., Phenomenological theory of ion salvation. Effective radii of hydrated ions, J. Phys. Chem., 63 (1959), 1381–1387.
30.
SteenM.L., JordanA.C., and FisherE.R., Hydrophilic modification of polymeric membranes by low temperature H2O plasma treatment, J. Membr. Sci., 204 (2002), 341–357.
31.
WavhalD.S., and FisherE.R., Membrane surface modification by plasma induced polymerization of acrylamide for improved surface properties and reduced protein fouling, Langmuir, 19 (2003), 79–85.
32.
TaniguchiM., PieracciJ.P., and BelfortG., Effect of undulations on surface energy: A quantitative assessment, Langmuir, 17 (2001), 4312–4315.
