Are ‘core’ feminist critiques of securitization theory racist? A reply to Alison Howell and Melanie Richter-Montpetit

Aharoni SB Féron É (2019) National populism and gendered vigilantism: The case of the Soldiers of Odin in Finland. Cooperation and Conflict. Epub ahead of print May 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0010836719850207.

Buzan B Wæver O De Wilde J (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

Der Derian J (1994) Response: The pen, the sword and the smart bomb: Criticism in the age of video. Alternatives 19(1): 133–140.

Derrida J (1986) But, beyond . . . (Open letter to Anne McClintock and Rob Nixon). Critical Inquiry 13(1): 155–170.

Hansen L (2000) The Little Mermaid’s silent security dilemma and the absence of gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium 29(2): 285–306.

Hansen L (2001) Gender, nation, rape: Bosnia and the construction of security. International Feminist Journal of Politics 3(1): 55–75.

Hansen L (2019) Reconstructing the silence/speech dichotomy in feminist security studies: Gender, agency and the politics of subjectivity in La Frontière Invicible. In: Parpart JL Parashar S (eds) Rethinking Silence, Voice and Agency in Contested Gendered Terrains. London: Routledge, 27–49.

Howell A Richter-Montpetit M (2019) Is securitization theory racist? Civilizationism, methodological whiteness, and antiblack thought in the Copenhagen School. Security Dialogue. Epub ahead of print 7 August 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0967010619862921.

Parpart JL Parashar S (eds) (2019) Rethinking Silence, Voice and Agency in Contested Gendered Terrains. London: Routledge.

Spivak GC (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: Nelson C Grossberg L (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 271–313.