Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As military technologies progress at a pace that challenges human cognitive and reasoning capacities, it is becoming ever more difficult to appraise the ethics of their use. In this article, I argue that the contours of ethical killing are shaped and constrained by a medical discourse that has its basis in a deeper regime of techno-biopolitical expertise. Narratives and representations of drones as surgical, ethical and wise instruments for counter-terrorism activities rely not only on the rendering neutral of both technology and practice, but also on a conflation of technology with practice as a biopolitical necessity. In this conflation, I argue, the practice of targeted killing is adiaphorized. Images and metaphors of the body politic turn drone-strikes into a form of medicine that experts prescribe as a means of treating or preventing political cancers, diseases and illnesses. Ethics, in turn, is treated as a primarily technical matter – something to be technologically clarified and administered from an expert space beyond the zone of ethical contestation. As long as this is the case, ethics will remain but a cog in our new killing machines.

Keywords

Biopolitics critical theory drones ethics of violence technology war

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

Shachtman

(2012) Almost 1 in 3 U.S. warplanes is a robot. Wired.com , 1 September. Available at: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/01/drone-report/ (accessed 9 August 2013).

Anderson

(2011) Facing the future enemy: US counterinsurgency doctrine and the pre-insurgent. Theory, Culture & Society 28(7–8): 216–240.

Anderson

(2013) Drones are ethical and effective. Speech given to the Oxford Union, 25 April. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G99A8LAKnaU&feature=youtube_gdata_player (accessed 8 August 2013).

Arendt

(1970) On Violence. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace & Co.

Arkin

(2010) The case for ethical autonomy in unmanned systems. Journal of Military Ethics 9(4): 332–341.

Asaro

(2012) On banning autonomous weapon systems: Human rights, automation, and the dehumanization of lethal decision-making. International Review of the Red Cross 94(886): 687–710.

Asaro

(2013) The labor of surveillance and bureaucratized killing: New subjectivities of military drone operators. Social Semiotics 23(2): 196–224.

Bauman

(2000) Ethics of individuals. Canadian Journal of Sociology 25(1): 83–96.

Bauman

(2012) Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity.

10.

Bauman

Lyon

(2013) Liquid Surveillance: A Conversation. Cambridge: Polity.

11.

Becker

Shane

(2012) Secret ‘kill list’ tests Obama’s principles. New York Times, 29 May. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html (accessed 1 July 2012).

12.

Bell

(2012) Hybrid warfare and its metaphors. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 3(2): 225–247.

13.

Berkowitz

(2012) Human being in an inhuman age. HA: The Journal of the Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities 1(1): 112–122.

14.

Boyle

(2015) The legal and ethical implications of drone warfare. The International Journal of Human Rights 19(2): 105–126.

15.

Braidotti

(2011) Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti. New York: Columbia University Press.

16.

Braidotti

(2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.

17.

Brennan

(2012a) The efficacy and ethics of the President’s counterterrorism strategy. Speech delivered at the Wilson Center, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/the-efficacy-and-ethics-us-counterterrorism-strategy (accessed 7 August 2013).

18.

Brennan

(2012b) ‘This Week’ Transcript: John Brennan, Economic Panel. ABC News, 29 April. Available at: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/week-transcript-john-brennan/story?id=16228333&singlePage=true#.T6QEOu1OXna (accessed 4 May 2012).

19.

Byman

(2013) Why drones work: The case for Washington’s weapon of choice. Foreign Affairs 92(4): 32–43.

20.

Caldwell

Hagerott

(2010) Curing Afghanistan. Foreign Policy, 7 April. Available at: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/04/07/curing_afghanistan (accessed 5 August 2013).

21.

Carney

(2013) Speech given to the White House press corps, 5 February. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg8jPheXtas&feature=youtube_gdata_player (accessed 2 August 2013).

22.

Carvin

(2015) Getting drones wrong. The International Journal of Human Rights 19(2): 127–141.

23.

Chamayou

(2015) A Theory of the Drone. New York: The New Press.

24.

Cheney-Lippold

(2011) A new algorithmic identity: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society 28(6): 164–181.

25.

Cherlin

(2013) Obama’s drone master. GQ.com , 17 June. Available at: http://www.gq.com/news-politics/big-issues/201306/john-brennan-cia-director-interview-drone-program?printable=true (accessed 23 July 2013).

26.

Coker

(2013) Warrior Geeks: How the 21st Century Technology is Changing the Way We Fight and Think About War. London: C Hurst & Co.

27.

Congressional Budget Office (2011) Policy options for unmanned aircraft systems. Congress of the United States CBO 4083. Available at: http://fas.org/irp/program/collect/cbo-uas.pdf (accessed 17 March 2015).

28.

De Leonardis

(2008) War as a medicine: The medical metaphor in contemporary Italian political language. Social Semiotics 18(1): 33–45.

29.

Dillon

Lobo-Guerrero

(2008) Biopolitics of security in the 21st century: An introduction. Review of International Studies 34(2): 265–292.

30.

Dillon

Reid

(2009) The Liberal Way of War: Killing To Make Life Live. Abingdon: Routledge.

31.

Doel

(1999) Poststructuralist Geographies: The Diabolical Art of Spatial Science. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

32.

Enemark

(2014) Armed Drones and the Ethics of War: Military Virtue in a Post-heroic Age. Abingdon: Routledge.

33.

European RPAS Steering Group (2013) Roadmap for the Integration of Civil Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems into the European Aviation System. Brussels: European Commission.

34.

Evans

(2013) Liberal Terror. Cambridge: Polity.

35.

Finn

(2014) Review of ‘Liquid Surveillance: A Conversation’. Canadian Journal of Communication 39(2): 497–499.

36.

Gertler

(2012) U.S. unmanned aerial systems. CRS Report for Congress, 3 January. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

37.

Grayson

(2012) The ambivalence of assassination: Biopolitics, culture and political violence. Security Dialogue 43(1): 25–41.

38.

Gregory

(2008) The rush to the intimate: Counterinsurgency and culture in the late modern war. Geographical Imaginations. Available at: http://geographicalimaginations.com/downloads/ (accessed 20 June 2015).

39.

Gregory

(2011a) From a view to kill: Drones and late modern war. Theory, Culture & Society 28(7–8): 188–215.

40.

Gregory

(2011b) The everywhere war. The Geographical Journal 177(3): 238–250.

41.

Haraway

(1997) Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.

42.

Heisenberg

(1958) The Physicist’s Conception of Nature. London: Hutchinson & Co.

43.

International Journal of Human Rights (2015) Special issue: Legal and ethical implications of drone warfare. 19(2): 105–227.

44.

Jacobsen

Poder

(2008) The Sociology of Zygmunt Bauman: Challenges and Critique. Aldershot: Ashgate.

45.

Johansson

(2011) Is it morally right to use unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in war? Philosophy and Technology 24: 279–291.

46.

Keane

(2004) Violence and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

47.

Kennedy

Rogers

(2015) Virtuous drones? International Journal of Human Rights 19(2): 211–227.

48.

Lakoff

(1991) Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify the war in the Gulf. Viet Nam Generation Journal and Newsletter 3(3). Available at: http://www2.iath.virginia.edu/sixties/HTML_docs/Texts/Scholarly/Lakoff_Gulf_Metaphor_1.html (accessed 17 March 2015).

49.

Leander

(2013) Technological agency in the co-constitution of legal expertise and the US drone program. Leiden Journal of International Law 26(4): 811–831.

50.

Lee

(2013) Debate: Is the use of unmanned military drones ethical or criminal? Guardian, 2 December. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/video/2013/dec/02/unmanned-military-drones-battle-ethical-video-debate (accessed 25 June 2015).

51.

Lin

(2011) Drone-ethics briefing: What a leading robot expert told the CIA. The Atlantic, 15 December. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/12/drone-ethics-briefing-what-a-leading-robot-expert-told-the-cia/250060/ (accessed 3 May 2012).

52.

Lorenz

Von Mittelstaedt

Schmitz

(2011) ‘Messengers of death’: Are drones creating a new global arms race? Spiegel Online, 21 October. Available at: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,792590,00.html (accessed 4 May 2012).

53.

McFalls

(2007) A Matter of Life and Death: Iatrogenic Violence and the Formal Logic of International Intervention. Ontario: Centre for the Critical Study of Global Power and Politics, Trent University.

54.

McMahan

(2013) Foreword. In: Strawser

(ed.) Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of an Unmanned Military. New York: Oxford University Press, ix–xv.

55.

Mayer

(2009) The predator war: What are the risks of the CIA’s covert drone program? The New Yorker, 26 October. Available at: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/10/26/the-predator-war (accessed 10 May 2012).

56.

Miller

(2012) White House approves broader Yemen drone campaign. Washington Post, 25 April. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/white-house-approves-broader-yemen-drone-campaign/2012/04/25/gIQA82U6hT_story.html?sub=AR (accessed 4 May 2012).

57.

Mooney

Young

(2005) Imagining terrorism: Terrorism and anti-terrorism terrorism, two ways of doing evil. Social Justice 32(1): 113–125.

58.

New America Foundation (2012) Drone wars Pakistan: Analysis. Available at: http://securitydata.newamerica.net/drones/pakistan/analysis (accessed 17 March 2015).

59.

Nolin

(2012) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges for the Alliance. NATO Parliamentary Assembly, 157 STC 12 E. Available at: http://www.nato-pa.int/default.asp?SHORTCUT=3024 (accessed 17 March 2015).

60.

Obama

(2013) Obama’s speech on drone policy. New York Times, 23 May. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/24/us/politics/transcript-of-obamas-speech-on-drone-policy.html?_r=0 (accessed 16 March 2015).

61.

Omand

Wheeler

(2014) The security impact of drones: Challenges and opportunities for the UK. Birmingham Policy Commission. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

62.

Oudes

Zwijnenburg

(2011) Does Unmanned Make Unacceptable? Exploring the Debate on Using Drones and Robots in Warfare. Utrecht: IKV Pax Christi.

63.

Pugliese

(2011) Prosthetics of law and the anomic violence of drones. Griffith Law Review 20(4): 931–961.

64.

Roderick

(2010) Mil-bot fetishism: The pataphysics of military robots. Topia (23–24): 286–303.

65.

Rose

(2001) The politics of life itself. Theory, Culture & Society 18(6): 1–30.

66.

Rose

(2006) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

67.

Sanger

(2011) As drones evolve, more countries want their own. National Public Radio, 26 September. Available at: http://www.npr.org/2011/09/26/140812779/as-drones-evolve-more-countries-want-their-own (accessed 18 November 2011).

68.

Sharkey

(2010) Saying ‘no!’ to lethal autonomous targeting. Journal of Military Ethics 9(4): 369–383.

69.

Singer

(2009) Robots at war: The new battlefield. The Wilson Quarterly, 26 January. Available at: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/classes/AY2009/cs4001c_spring/documents/WilsonQuarterly-RobotsAtWar.pdf (accessed 6 August 2013).

70.

Singer

(2010) Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century. London: Penguin.

71.

Strawser

(2010) Moral predators: The duty to employ uninhabited aerial vehicles. Journal of Military Ethics 9(4): 342–368.

72.

Strawser

(2013) Introduction: The moral landscape of unmanned weapons. In: Strawser

(ed.) Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of an Unmanned Military. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–24.

73.

Till

(2013) Architects of time: Labouring on digital futures. Thesis Eleven 118(1): 33–47.

74.

US Department of Defense (2012) Program acquisition cost by weapon system. United States Department of Defense Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Request. Available at: http://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/documents/defbudget/fy2013/fy2013_Weapons.pdf (accessed 17 March 2015).

75.

Wald

(2007) Contagious: Cultures, Carriers, and the Outbreak Narrative. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

76.

Walters

(2014) Drone-strikes, dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security. Security Dialogue 45(2): 101–118.

77.

Weir

(1996) Recent developments in the government of pregnancy. Economy and Society 25(3): 373–392.

78.

Williams

(2011) Enabling persistent presence? Performing the embodied geopolitics of the unmanned aerial vehicle assemblage. Political Geography 30(7): 381–390.

79.

Williams

(2015) Distant intimacy: Space, drones and just war. Ethics and International Affairs 29(1): 93–110.

80.

Woods

Yusufzai

(2013) Get the data: The return of double-tap drone-strikes. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, 1 August. Available at: http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2013/08/01/get-the-data-the-return-of-double-tap-drone-strikes/ (accessed 20 May 2014).

81.

Zehfuss

(2011) Targeting: Precision and the production of ethics. European Journal of International Relations 17(3): 543–566.

Prescription drones: On the techno-biopolitical regimes of contemporary ‘ethical killing’

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References