Even though its focus on emancipation purposefully intends to build upon the intellectual legacy of the Frankfurt School, critical security studies has thus far only interpreted the Frankfurt tradition in a circumscribed manner. That is to say, it selectively drew on some concepts from critical theory that are most associated with Jürgen Habermas and Axel Honneth. However, as a result of this emphasis, Booth and Wyn Jones – the original proponents of critical security studies – give too little attention to thinkers such as Theodor W. Adorno. This article demonstrates that a re-engagement with Adorno’s work not only provides a more complete appraisal of the Frankfurt School’s thought, but also might reinvigorate critical security studies as a ‘critical’ approach to security. It proposes that such a result can be achieved by employing Adorno’s ethics of resistance and through the development of the philosophical construct of a constellation of security.
AdornoTW (1973c) Philosophische Terminologien I [Philosophical Terminologies I]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
5.
AdornoTW (1993) Hegel: Three Studies. Translated by Weber-NicholsonS. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
AdornoTW (2000) Problems of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity.
7.
AdornoTW (2003a) Minima Moralia. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
8.
AdornoTW (2003b) Can One Live After Auschwitz? A Philosophical Reader. Edited by TiedemannR. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
AdornoTW (2005) Dialektik der Freiheit [Dialectic of Freedom]. Edited by HonnethA. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
10.
AdornoTW (2010) Probleme der Moralphilosophie [Problems of Moral Philosophy]. Edited by SchroederT. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
11.
AdornoTWHorkheimerM (1997) Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso.
12.
AlkerH (2001) Emancipation in the critical security studies project. In: Wyn JonesR (ed.) Critical Theory and World Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 189–241.
13.
AradauC (2004) Security and the democratic scene: Desecuritization and emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development7(4): 388–413.
BernsteinJM (2001) Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
BigoDTsoukalaA (2008) Understanding (in)security. In: BigoDTsoukalaA (eds) Terror, Insecurity and Liberty: Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes After 9/11. London: Routledge, 1–9.
17.
BigoDWalkerRBJ (2007) International political sociology. International Political Sociology1(1): 1–5.
18.
BoothK (1991) Security and emancipation. Review of International Studies17(4): 313–326.
19.
BoothK (2007) Theory of World Security. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
20.
DjassemyI (2002) Der ‘Productivgehalt Kritischer Zerstoerbarkeit’: Kulturkritik bei Karl Kraus und Theodor W. Adorno [The ‘Productivity of Critical Destructibility’: Cultural Criticism in Karl Kraus und Theodor W. Adorno]. Wuerzburg: Koenigshausen & Neumann.
21.
FaganA (2005) Theodor Adorno (1903–1969). Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://www.iep.utm.edu/adorno/ (accessed 4 May 2011).
22.
FinlaysonJG (2002) Adorno on the ethical and the ineffable. European Journal of Philosophy10(1): 1–25.
23.
FloydR (2007) Towards a consequentialist evaluation of security: Bringing together the Copenhagen and Welsh Schools of security studies. Review of International Studies33(2): 327–350.
GunningJ (2009) Social movement theory and the study of terrorism. In: JacksonRBreen SmythMGunningJ (eds) Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda. London: Routledge, 156–177.
26.
HabermasJ (1970) Towards a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics. East Sussex Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
27.
HammerE (2006) Adorno and the Political. London: Routledge.
28.
Heath-KellyC (2010) Critical terrorism studies, critical theory and the ‘naturalistic fallacy’. Security Dialogue41(3): 235–254.
29.
HeineCTeschkeB (1996) Sleeping Beauty and the dialectical awakening: On the potential of dialectic for international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies25(2): 399–423.
30.
HorkheimerM (2002) Traditional and critical theory. In: Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Continuum, 188–243.
31.
JamesonF (2009) Valences of the Dialectic. London: Verso.
32.
JayM (1984) Adorno. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
LinklaterA (2007) Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity. London: Routledge.
34.
LovittW (1995) Modern Technology in the Heideggerian Perspective. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.
35.
MooreA (1997) Points of View. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
36.
NeocleousM (2008) Critique of Security. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
37.
PeoplesC (2009) Theodor Adorno. In: EdkinsJVaughan-WilliamsN (eds) Critical Theorists and International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 7–18.
38.
PeoplesC (2011) Security after emancipation? Critical theory, violence and resistance. Review of International Studies37(3): 1113–1135.
39.
Reis NunesJ (2005) Towards emancipation of the self: A critique of ‘security as emancipation’. Working Paper no.12. Lisbon: Portuguese Institute of International Relations, New University of Lisbon.
40.
RoseG (1978) The Melancholy Science: An Introduction to the Thought of Theodor W. Adorno. London: Macmillan.
41.
SalterMB (2007) Governmentalities of an airport: Heterotopia and confession. International Political Sociology1(1): 49–66.
42.
SchaapS (2000) Die Verwirklichung der Philosophie: der metaphysische Anspruch im Denken Theodor W. Adornos [The Realization of Philosophy: The Metaphysical Claim in the Thought of Theodor Adorno]. Wuerzburg: Koenigshausen & Neumann.
43.
SchmausM (1999) ‘Die Wunden des Geistes heilen’. Zur Autobiographie des melancholischen Geistes oder der ‘Fall Hölderlin’ in Hegels Phänomenologie [‘The spirit’s wounds are healing’: The autobiography of the melancholy spirit or the ‘Hölderlin case’ in Hegel’s phenomenology]. Available at: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/hostings/athenaeum/documents/athenaeum/1999–9/schmaus-marion-67/PDF/schmaus.pdf (accessed 12 February 2012).
44.
SeelM (2011) Das Richtige im Falschen [The right in the wrong]. Die Zeit, 14October.
45.
TheunissenM (1983) Negativität bei Adorno [Negativity in Adorno]. In: HabermasJFriedeburgLV (eds) Zum Begriff der Sprache [On the Concept of Language]. Stuttgart: Reclam, 41–61.
46.
ThomsonI (2000) From the question concerning technology to the quest for democratic technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, Feenberg. In: PetersMOlssenMLankshearC (eds) Futures of Critical Theory: Dreams of Difference. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 59–72.
47.
WæverO (2004) Aberystwyth, Paris, Copenhagen: New ‘schools’ in security theory and their origins between core and periphery. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Montreal, 17–20 March.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
