Barry Buzan & Lene Hansen (2009) have filled an important gap in the literature by writing the first comprehensive survey of international security studies. While their work is systematically organized, their analytical framework could be strengthened by giving greater consideration to the complex interrelationships between theory and practices and by embedding theoretical constructs (and their inherently contradictory developments) within history.
Alker, Hayward R. & Thomas J. Biersteker, 1984. ‘The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savoir Faire’, International Studies Quarterly28(2): 121-142.
2.
Alker, Hayward R.; Thomas J. Biersteker & Takashi Inoguchi, 1989. ‘From Imperial Power Balancing to People’s Wars’, in James Der Derian & Michael J. Shapiro, eds, International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. New York : Lexington (135-162).
3.
Alker, Hayward R.; Tahir Amin, Thomas J. Biersteker & Takashi Inoguchi, forthcoming. The Dialectics of World Orders.
4.
Barnett, Michael N., 1999. ‘Peacekeeping, Indifference, and Genocide in Rwanda’ , in Jutta Weldes, Mark Laffey, Hugh Gusterson & Raymond Duvall, eds, Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press (173-202).
5.
Buzan, Barry & Lene Hansen, 2009. The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Der Derian, James, 2008. ‘The Alker Effect’, International Political Sociology2(1): 82-84.
7.
Habermas, Jürgen, 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
8.
Keynes, John Maynard, 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
9.
King, Gary; Kay Lehman Schlozman & Norman H. Nie, 2009. The Future of Political Science. New York: Taylor & Francis.
10.
Neumann, Iver B., 2007. ‘"A Speech That the Entire Ministry May Stand for", or: Why Diplomats Never Produce Anything New’, International Political Sociology1(2): 183- 200.
