Abstract
Critics of global governance have been influenced by Foucault’s analysis of modern total institutions disciplining both the mind and the body. However, Foucauldian biopolitics may present global governance too smoothly. This article takes critiques arguing that consumer capitalism’s divorce from industrial production encourages romantic understandings of global problems and applies them to development aspects of the development—security nexus. It discusses three influential economists each of whose work is emblematic of consumer capitalism’s international development vision at particular historical junctures. The article outlines how Rostow’s
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
