The aim of this research study was to uncover women ministers’ experiences of gender discrimination in the Lutheran Church by using a discourse analysis. Three female participants, who are involved in ministry in the Lutheran Church in South Africa, were interviewed about their experiences and perceptions of gender discrimination. The resultant texts were analysed using Parker’s (2005) steps to discourse analytic reading. The discourses that were discovered indicate that power struggles are prevalent in the context of gender discrimination. The extent to which an individual opposes gender discrimination is informed by contextual, educational and historical factors. In addition to this, gender discrimination within the church is easily legitimized – to a large extent by women – through discourses, such as biblical texts.
AtkinsK (2005) Commentary on Butler. In: AtkinsK (ed.) Self and Subjectivity. Oxford: Blackwell, 252–56.
2.
BabbieEMoutonJ (eds) (2005) Qualitative studies. In: BabbieEMoutonJ (eds) The Practice of Social Research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 269–311.
3.
BilligM (1995) Banal Nationalism. London: SAGE.
4.
BilligM (2003) Critical discourse analysis and the rhetoric of critique. In: WeissGWodakR (eds) Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 35–46.
5.
BrewLKottlerJA (2008) Applied Helping Skills: Transforming Lives. Los Angeles: SAGE.
ButlerJ (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. London: Routledge.
8.
ChodorowN (1989) Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
CoyleA (2007) Discourse analysis. In: LyonsECoyleA (eds) Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology. London: SAGE, 98–116.
10.
de BeauvoirS (1972) The Second Sex. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
11.
EmanuelE JWendlerDGradyC (2000) What makes clinical research ethical?Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(20): 2701–11.
12.
EmmettM (Producer and Director) (2000) The Other Voices; Women Exploring the Sacred Places [Motion picture]. Johannesburg, South Africa: Curious Pictures.
13.
FaircloughN (2007) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
JantzenGM (1998) Disrupting the sacred: religion and gender in the city. In: O’GradyKGilroyALGrayJ (eds) Bodies, Lives, Voices: Gender in Theology. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 72-92.
17.
KangN (2005) The centrality of gender justice in prophetic Christianity and the mission of the church reconsidered. International Review of Mission94(373): 278–89.
18.
LawrenceM (1992) Women’s psychology and feminist social work practice. In: LanganMDayL (eds) Women, Oppression and Social Work. London: Routledge, 32–47.
19.
LemkeJL (2003) Texts and discourses in the technologies of social organisation. In: WeissGWodakR (eds) Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 130–49.
20.
O’ConnorFDruryBS (1999) The Female Face in Patriarchy: Oppression as Culture. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
21.
ParkerI (1994) Discourse analysis. In: BanisterPBurmanEParkerITaylorMTindallC (eds) Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide. Buckingham: Open University Press, 92–108.
22.
ParkerI (2005) Qualitative Psychology: Introducing Radical Research. New York: Open University Press.
23.
PotterJWetherellM (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: SAGE.
24.
RakoczyS (2004) In Her Name: Women Doing Theology. Pietermaritzburg: Cluster Publications.
25.
SchiffrinD (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
SölleDKirchbergerJH (2001) Great Women of the Bible in Art and Literature. Vienna: Fortress.
27.
WilligC (1995) ‘I wouldn’t have married the guy if I’d have to do that’. Heterosexual adults’ constructions of condom use and their implications for sexual practice. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology5: 75–87.
28.
WolffJ (1990) Feminine Sentence: Essays on Women and Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
