Legal consciousness studies have demonstrated that law manifests in diverse forms and spaces beyond formal institutions, permeating the everyday lives of individuals. However, this growing body of work often overlooks the role of objects and non-human agents in shaping legal experiences. Adopting a micro-sociological perspective, this article bridges legal consciousness and material culture studies by examining how objects mediate the process of problematization—understanding everyday life through the lens of law. Drawing on a judicial ethnography conducted in 2017 in Chilean family courts processing domestic violence cases, we analyze three seemingly mundane objects: a legal text kiosk near the courthouse, televisions broadcasting institutional videos, and magazines in the waiting area adjacent to the courtroom. These objects mark the transition from public to legal spaces and forge connections between everyday life and legality. Our findings reveal that materiality underpins the emergence of legal power, transforming domestic violence into a legal dispute while preserving unproblematic aspects of daily life.
AbregoLJ (2019) Relational legal consciousness of U.S. citizenship: Privilege, responsibility, guilt, and love in Latino mixed-status families. Law & Society Review53(3): 641–670.
2.
AlbeVLacourS (2018) Legal consciousness studies and science and technology studies: Drawing parallels?Droit et Société100(3): 633–644.
3.
AraujoKGuzmánVMauroA (2000) El surgimiento de la violencia doméstica como problema público y objeto de políticas. Revista de la CEPAL2000: 133–145. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11362/12204 (accessed 2 April 2025).
4.
Araya-MorenoJ (2021) Pandemic documents: The case of mobility permits during lockdown in Chile. Anthropologica63(2): 1–21.
5.
Araya NovoaMP (2024) Por el derecho de vivir en paz y a una vida libre de violencia de género: reflexiones a propósito de la ley No 21.675. Revista de Estudios Judiciales9: 235–268.
6.
ArenasJDamkeKCarrilloG (2021) Violencia intrafamiliar: Fenómeno psicosocial y marco regulatorio. Academia Judicial de Chile. Available at: http://www.academiajudicial.cl (accessed 2 April 2025).
7.
BanksM (2001) Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage Publications.
8.
BarreraLLatorreS (2021) Actor-network theory and socio-legal analysis. In: ValverdeMClarkeKMSmithEDKotiswaranP (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Law and Society. London: Routledge, pp.9–14.
9.
BauerAMKosibaS (2016) How things act: An archaeology of materials in political life. Journal of Social Archaeology16(2): 115–141.
10.
BergerPLLuckmannT (1979) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
11.
BerkhoutCZgorska-Meynard-MoussaSWillefert-BoucheA, et al. (2018) Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings’ waiting rooms. A systematic review. European Journal of General Practice1: 202–210.
12.
BuchliV (2002) The Material Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg.
13.
ButtimerA (1976) Grasping the dynamism of lifeworld. Annals of the Association of American Geographers66(2): 277–292.
14.
CallonM (1998) An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology. The Sociological Review46(1): 244–269.
15.
CasasL (2006) Ley N° 20.066 sobre Violencia Intrafamiliar: ¿Un cambio de paradigma? In: MedinaCZalaquettJ (eds) Anuario de Derechos Humanos. Santiago: Universidad de Chile, pp.197–202.
ChuaLJEngelDM (2019) Legal consciousness reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science15(1): 335–353.
18.
CloatreECowanD (2019) Legalities and materialities. In: Philippopoulos-MihalopoulosA (ed) Routledge Handbook of Law and Theory. London: Routledge, pp.433–452.
19.
CloatreECowanDHammerslevO, et al. (2024) The object(s) of legality. Journal of Law and Society51(Suppl. 1): S30–S44.
Corporación Administrativa del Poder Judicial, Unidad de Infraestructura (2009) Manual de estandarización de diseños arquitectónicos: Edificios del Poder Judicial. Available at: https://sni.gob.cl/storage/docs/Metodologia_CAPJ_2021_enf_gen.pdf (accessed 27 December 2024).
22.
De GirolamoD (2021) Collective dissent as legal consciousness in contemporary British theatre. Social & Legal Studies31(1): 99–118.
23.
De la MazaFCamposLERivasA, et al. (2022) Pueblos originarios y acceso a la justicia. Materiales Docentes No. 49. Santiago de Chile: Academia Judicial de Chile.
EwickPSilbeySS (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
FerrelJ (2016) Foreword: Graffiti, street art and the politics of complexity. In: RossJI (ed) Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art. Oxford: Routledge, pp.xxx–xxxviii.
27.
FlessasTMulcahyL (2016) Limiting law: art in the street and street in the art. Law, Culture and the Humanities14(2): 219–241.
28.
FloresAEscuderoKBurciagaE (2019) Legal–spatial consciousness: A legal geography framework for examining migrant illegality. Law & Policy41(1): 1–25.
29.
FoucaultM (2001) Fearless Speech (edited by PearsonJ). New York: Semiotext(e).
30.
Fuentealba-CarrascoPSánchez PezoGGauché MarchettiX, et al. (2022) La discriminación laboral en el Poder Judicial chileno. Una caracterización de las percepciones al interior de la institución. Ius et Praxis28(1): 60–81.
31.
GessnerINandiMSchwarz-BierschenkJ (2019) Matterealities: Historical trajectories and conceptual futures for material culture studies. Open Cultural Studies3(1): 308–316.
32.
HallidaySMorganB (2013) I fought the law and the law won? Legal consciousness and the critical imagination. Current Legal Problems66(1): 1–32.
33.
HerreraMCOlayaV (2011) Ciudades tatuadas: arte callejero, política y memorias visuales. Nómadas18(2): 99–116.
34.
HertoghM (2018) Nobody’s Law: Legal Consciousness and Legal Alienation in Everyday Life. London: Palgrave Pivot.
35.
HicksDBeaudryMC (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
HinerHAzócarMJ (2015) Irreconcilable differences: Political culture and gender violence during the Chilean transition to democracy. Latin American Perspectives42(3): 52–72.
37.
HowesD (2019) Multisensory anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology48(48): 17–28.
38.
KangHY (2018) Law’s materiality. In: Philipopoulos-MihalopoulosA (ed) Routledge Handbook of Law and Theory. London: Routledge, pp.453–474.
39.
KubalA (2024) Judicial relational legal consciousness: authoritarian backsliding as a catalyst of change. Journal of Law and Society51(1): S45–S65.
40.
LatorreG (2019) Democracy on the Wall: Street Art of the Post-Dictatorship Era in Chile. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
41.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
42.
LatourB (2010) The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d'État. Cambridge: Polity Press.
43.
LewisohnC (2010) Street Art: The Graffiti Revolution. London: Tate Publishing.
44.
LynchK (1964) The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
MarshallAMBarclayS (2003) In their own words: How ordinary people construct the legal world. Law & Social Inquiry28: 617–628.
46.
MaurerB (2006) In the matter of Marxism. In: TilleyCKeaneWKuechlerSRowlandsMSpyerP (eds) Handbook of Material Culture. London: Sage, pp.13–28.
47.
MerrySE (2001) Spatial governmentality and the new urban social order: Controlling gender violence through law. American Anthropologist103(1): 16–29.
48.
MerrySE (2003) Rights talk and the experience of law: Implementing women's human rights to protection from violence. Human Rights Quarterly25(2): 343–381.
49.
MillerDTilleyC (1996) Editorial. Journal of Material Culture1(1): 5–14.
Miranda PérezF (2020) Instituciones de justicia y violencias contra las mujeres: tensiones y desafíos para su abordaje. RUMBOS TS15(21): 49–65.
52.
MooreDSinghR (2017) Seeing crime, feeling crime: Visual evidence, emotions, and the prosecution of domestic violence. Theoretical Criminology22(1): 116–132.
53.
NakamuraK (2013) Making sense of sensory ethnography: The sensual and the multisensory. American Anthropologist115(1): 132–135.
54.
ParodiK (2025) Gendering justice in the Chilean courts: Institutional developments and legal actors’ perspectives. Latin American Research Review. Epub ahead of print 27 January 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2024.72.
Poder Judicial de Chile (n.d.a) Canal oficial de YouTube del Poder Judicial de Chile. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/@pjudicialchile (accessed 3 April 2025).
RiquelmeEspinosa (2022) The abandonment of the family courts' intra family violence procedures: The history of an ethnographic object. Oñati Socio-Legal Series12(2): 238–263. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1233
61.
Riquelme EspinosaI (2024) “There is just nothing to hold on to in this case”: Legal technicalities and the use of psychological reports in Chilean domestic violence procedures. Journal of Law and Society51: 239–262.
62.
Riquelme EspinosaIQuiroz RojasL (2024) Conciencia jurídica y autoridad judicial: riesgo y desigualdades de género en procedimientos por violencia intrafamiliar (VIF) en Chile. Novum Jus18(2): 177–302.
63.
Rivera CusicanquiS (2010) Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: Una reflexión sobre prácticas y discursos descolonizadores. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.
64.
Rivera CusicanquiS (2018) Un mundo ch’ixi es posible: Ensayos desde un presente en crisis. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.
65.
SaratAKearnsTR (1993) Editorial introduction. In: SaratAKearnsTR (eds) Law in Everyday Life. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, pp.1–20.
66.
SaundersNJ (2002) Memory and conflict. In: BuchliV (ed) The Material Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg, pp.175–206.
67.
SchacterR (2016) Graffiti and street art as ornament. In: RossJI (ed) Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art. London: Routledge, pp.141–157.
68.
SchlieheAJeffreyA (2023) Investigating trial spaces: Thinking through legal spatiality beyond the court. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers48: 9–22.
69.
SchutzALuckmannT (1974) The Structures of the Life-World. London: Northwestern University Press.
70.
SilbeySS (2005) After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science1(1): 323–368.
71.
SilbeySS (2018) Studying legal consciousness: Building institutional theory from micro data. Droit et Société100(3): 685–731.
72.
SparkesAC (2009) Ethnography and the senses: Challenges and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise1(1): 21–35.
73.
TilleyC (2006) Theoretical perspectives. In: TilleyCKeaneWKuechlerSRowlandsMSpyerP (eds) Handbook of Material Culture. London: Sage, pp.7–12.
74.
TilleyCKeaneWKuechlerS, et al. (2006) Handbook of Material Culture. London: Sage.
