In the United States and elsewhere, civil legal services are an overlooked strategy in the response to sexual assault. Contrary to the criminal legal system, civil legal remedies can offer supports that are specific to survivors’ immediate needs in the aftermath of sexual assault. To learn more about this legal strategy, we explored three areas: 1) civil legal needs of survivors; 2) barriers to seeking civil legal services; and 3) what survivor-defined justice might look like. In-depth interviews were conducted with 24 civil legal attorneys who work with survivors of sexual assault in the US. Results indicate that survivors have a multitude of overlapping legal needs outside of the criminal legal system, especially related to increasing agency, safety, and stability in their lives. Yet, several barriers exist that prevent access to these legal remedies. Despite these barriers, attorneys outlined how survivors’ lives have been positively affected by the services they offer. Attorneys also spoke to what “survivor-defined justice” might look like for their clients in this context. The results support the need to expand our conceptualization of justice beyond what the criminal legal system can offer. Implications for advancing civil remedies as a survivor-centered legal strategy are discussed.
AntonsdottirH (2019) Injustice disrupted: experiences of just spaces by victim-survivors of sexual violence. Social and Legal Studies29(5): 718–744.
2.
BejinariuATroshynskiEIMietheTD (2019) Civil protection orders and their courtroom context: the impact of gatekeepers on legal decisions. Journal of Family Violence34(3): 231–243.
3.
BouffardLANoblesMRGoodsonA, et al. (2017) Service providers’ knowledge and perceptions of the legal service needs of crime victims. American Journal of Criminal Justice42: 589–609.
4.
CampbellRSeflTBarnesH, et al. (1999) Community services for rape survivors: enhancing psychological well-being or increasing trauma?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology67(6): 847–858.
5.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Clay-WarnerJBurtC (2005) Rape reporting after reforms: have times really changed?Violence Against Women11(2): 150–176.
7.
DalyK (2017) Sexual violence and victims’ justice interests. In: ZinsstagEKeenanM (eds) Restorative responses to sexual violence: legal, social and therapeutic dimensions. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis, 143–178.
8.
DalyKCurtis-FawleyS (2006) Justice for victims of sexual assault: court or conference? In: HeimerKKruttschnittC (eds) Gender and crime: patterns of victimization and offending. New York: NYU Press, 230–265.
9.
DePrinceAWrightNGagnonK, et al. (2020) Social reactions and women’s decisions to report sexual assault to law enforcement. Violence Against Women26(5): 399–416.
10.
DixonEPiepzna-SamarasinhaLL (eds) (2020) Beyond survival: Strategies and stories from the transformative justice movement. AK Press.
11.
GagnonKWrightNSrinivasT, et al. (2018) Survivors’ advice to service providers: how to best serve survivors of sexual assault. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma27(10): 1125–1144.
12.
HartleyCCRennerLMMackelS (2013) Civil legal services and domestic violence: missed service opportunities. Families in Society94(1): 15–22.
13.
HermanJ (1992) Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence–from domestic abuse to political terror. New York: Basic Books.
14.
HermanJ (2005) Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women11(5): 571–602.
KandelW (2013) Immigration provisions of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Congressional Research Service. Report Number R42477.
17.
KanterL (2005) Invisible clients: exploring our failure to provide civil legal services to rape victims. Suffolk University Law Review38: 253–289.
18.
KimM (2010) Alternative interventions to intimate violence: defining political and pragmatic challenges. In: PtacekJ (eds) Feminism and restorative justice. New York, NY: Oxford Press, 193–217.
19.
KimM (2013) Challenging the pursuit of criminalisation in an era of mass incarceration: the limitations of social work responses to domestic violence in the USA. British Journal of Social Work43(7): 1276–1293.
20.
KimM (2018) From carceral feminism to transformative justice: women-of-color feminism and alternatives to incarceration. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work27(3): 219–233.
21.
KirknerALorenzKUllmanS (2017) Recommendations for responding to survivors of sexual assault: a qualitative study of survivors and support providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence36(3–4): 1005–1028.
22.
KnothLRubackR (2019) Reporting crimes to the police depends on relationship networks: effects of ties among victims, advisors, and offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence34(13): 2749–2773.
23.
KonradiA (2010) Creating victim-centered criminal justice practices for rape prosecution. In: PeyrotMBurnsS (eds) New approaches to social problems treatment. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 43–76.
24.
LeeJBackesB (2018) Civil legal aid and domestic violence: a review of the literature and promising directions. Journal of Family Violence33(6): 421–433.
25.
LoganTKEvansLStevensonE, et al. (2005) Barriers to services for rural and urban survivors of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence20(5): 591–616.
26.
LonswayKArchambaultJ (2012) The “justice gap” for sexual assault cases: future directions for research and reform. Violence Against Women18(2): 145–168.
27.
LorenzKKirknerAUllmanS (2019) A qualitative study of sexual assault survivors’ post-assault legal system experiences. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation20(3): 263–287.
28.
MaloneS (2020) The power of survivor-defined justice. In: ValentiJFriedmanJ (eds) Believe me: how trusting women can change the world. New York, NY: Seal Press, 150–161.
29.
McGlynnCWestmarlandN (2019) Kaleidoscopic justice: sexual violence and victim-survivors’ perceptions of justice. Social and Legal Studies28(2): 179–201.
MessingJTBagwell-GrayMEWard-LasherA, et al. (2021) “Not bullet proof”: the complex choice not to seek a civil protection order for intimate partner violence. International Review of Victimology27: 173–195.
32.
MindlinJHeh ReevesL (2005) Rights and remedies: Meeting the civil legal needs of sexual violence survivors. Portland, OR: Center for Law and Public Policy on Sexual Violence.
33.
MooreDGertsevaA (2015) Civil legal problems experienced by victims of domestic violence and sexual assault in Washington state: Findings from 2014 Civil Legal Needs Update. Report, Washington State University, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center, Technical Report #15-034.
National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV) (2023) Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and Related Programs Appropriations for Fiscal Years 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24. Available at: FY24-Pres-Budget-Appropriations-Chart-FINAL-15MAR2023.pdf (nnedv.org) (accessed 20 Jan 2024).
36.
New Jersey Coalition Against Sexual Assault (2020) Facts: Sexual Assault Survivor Protection Act. Available at: https://njcasa.org/find-help/saspa/ (accessed 20 Jan 2024).
37.
PattersonDGreesonMCampbellR (2009) Understanding rape survivors’ decisions not to seek help from formal social systems. Health and Social Work34(2): 127–136.
38.
RennerLHartleyC (2021) Psychological well-being among women who experienced intimate partner violence and received civil legal services. Journal of Interpersonal Violence36(7-8): 3688–3709.
39.
SabinaCHoL (2014) Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma, Violence and Abuse15(3): 201–226.
40.
SaccoL (2019) The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA): Historical overview, funding, and reauthorization. Congressional Research Service. Report Number R45410.
41.
SeidmanIVickersS (2004) The second wave: an agenda for the next thirty years of rape law reform. Suffolk University Law Review38: 467–492.
42.
SpohnCTellisK (2012) The criminal justice system’s response to sexual violence. Violence Against Women18(2): 169–192.
43.
StrangHBraithwaiteJ (2002) Restorative Justice and Family Violence. Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
44.
TangEKatzAMorrisL, et al. (2022) Title IX at 50: A report by the National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. National Women’s Law Center. Available at: https://nwlc.org/resource/ncwge-title-ix-at-50/ (accessed 20 Jan 2024).
45.
UllmanSBrecklinL (2002) Sexual assault history, PTSD, and mental health service seeking in a national sample of women. Journal of Community Psychology30(3): 261–279.
46.
UllmanSPeter-HageneL (2014) Social reactions to sexual assault disclosure, coping, perceived control, and PTSD symptoms in sexual assault victims. Journal of Community Psychology42(4): 495–508.
47.
US Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women (USDOJ OVW) (2022) OVW Fiscal Year 2022 Legal Assistance for Victims (LAV) Grant Program Solicitation Grant Awards. Available at: https://www.justice.gov/ovw/awards/fy-2022-ovw-grant-awards-program#LAV (accessed 20 Jan 2024).
48.
VenemaR (2016) Police officer schema of sexual assault reports: real rape, ambiguous cases, and false reports. Journal of Interpersonal Violence31(5): 872–899.
49.
ZinterK (2023) Accessibility of civil legal service provision for survivors of sexual assault in Illinois. Dissertation, DePaul University.
