This article explores how ‘everyday’ lawyers undertaking routine criminal defence cases navigate an authoritarian legal system. Based on original fieldwork in the ‘disciplined democracy’ of Myanmar, the article examines how hegemonic state power and a functional absence of the rule of law have created a culture of passivity among ordinary practitioners. ‘Everyday’ lawyers are nevertheless able to uphold their clients’ dignity by practical and material support for the individual human experience – and in so doing, subtly resist, evade or disrupt state power. The article draws upon the literature on the sociology of lawyering and resistance, arguing for a multilayered understanding of dignity going beyond lawyers’ contributions to their clients’ legal autonomy. Focusing on dignity provides an alternative perspective to the otherwise often all-consuming rule of law discourse. In authoritarian legal systems, enhancing their clients’ dignity beyond legal autonomy may be the only meaningful contribution that ‘everyday’ lawyers can make.
AbelRL (1988) The Legal Profession in England and Wales. Oxford: Blackwell.
2.
AbelRL (1989) Between market and state: The legal profession in turmoil. The Modern Law Review52(3): 285–325.
3.
AbelRL (2003) English Lawyers Between Market and State: The Politics of Professionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
4.
Amnesty International (2017) My World is Finished: Rohingya Targeted in Crimes Against Humanity in Myanmar. London: Amnesty International.
5.
BerkmanT (2010) The Pakistani lawyers’ movement and the popular currency of judicial power. Harvard Law Review123(7): 1705–1726.
6.
BeyerJ (2015) Finding the law in Myanmar. Anthropology Today31(4): 3–7.
7.
BogaardsM (2009) How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization16(2): 399–423.
8.
BrennanE (2017) U Ko Ni’s assassination a symptom of deepening divisions in Myanmar. The Interpreter, 31 January.
9.
BrownM (2017) “An unqualified human good”? On rule of law, globalization, and imperialism. Law & Social Inquiry32: 1–36.
10.
BudlenderG (1992) The responsibility of lawyers to challenge injustice. Cleveland State Law Review40: 475.
11.
BünteM (2016) Myanmar’s protracted transition: Arenas, actors, and outcomes. Asian Survey56(2): 369–391.
12.
CarothersT (2010) Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
13.
CheesmanN (2009) Thin rule of law or un-rule of law in Myanmar?Pacific Affairs82: 597–613.
14.
CheesmanN (2014) What does the rule of law have to do with democratization (in Myanmar). South East Asia Research22(2): 213–232.
15.
CheesmanN (2015a) Opposing the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CheesmanN (2015b) That signifier of desire, the rule of law. Social Research82(2): 267–290.
17.
CheesmanN (2016) Rule-of-law lineages in colonial and early post-colonial Burma. Modern Asian Studies50(2): 564–601.
18.
CheesmanN (2017) Taking the rule of law’s opposition seriously. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law9(1): 29–44.
19.
CheesmanND’CostaBHaberkornT (2016) Anticipating the struggle against everyday impunity in Myanmar through accounts from Bangladesh and Thailand. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies3(1): 48–61.
20.
CheesmanNSanKM (2013) Not just defending; advocating for law in Myanmar. Wisconsin International Law Journal31(3): 702.
CohenNArieliT (2011) Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research48(4): 423–435.
23.
CollierDLevitskyS (1997) Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics49(3): 430–451.
24.
CrouchM (2011) Cause lawyers, the legal profession and the courts in Indonesia: The bar association controversy. Lawasia Journal: 63–86.
25.
CrouchM (2016) A personal tribute to U Ko Ni. New Mandala, 31 January.
26.
CrouchM (2017a) The Business of Transition: Law Reform, Development and Economics in Myanmar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
CrouchM (2017b) The everyday emergency: Between the constitution and the code of criminal procedure in Myanmar. In: HardingAOoKK (eds) Constitutionalism and Legal Change in Myanmar. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, pp. 157–172.
28.
CrouchM (2017c) The judiciary in Myanmar. In: SimpsonAFarrellyNHollidayI (eds) Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar. New York: Routledge, pp. 248–256.
29.
CrouchM (2019) The legal profession in Myanmar. In: AbelR (ed) Lawyers in Society, 2nd ed. Cumnor: Hart Publishing.
30.
CrouchMLindseyT (2014) Law, Society and Transition in Myanmar. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
31.
DanielsRJTrebilcockM (2004) The political economy of rule of law reform in developing countries. Michigan Journal of International Law26: 99.
32.
DeanK (2017) Myanmar: Surveillance and the turn from authoritarianism?Surveillance & Society15(3/4): 496.
33.
DenneyLBennettWSanKT (2016) Making Big Cases Small and Small Cases Disappear: Experiences of Local Justice in Myanmar. London: British Council, Overseas Development Institute and Saferworld.
34.
DukalskisA (2015) Transitional justice in Burma/Myanmar: Crossnational patterns and domestic context. Irish Studies in International Affairs26: 83–97.
35.
DyzenhausD (2000) Legality and legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
DyzenhausD (2006) The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
EllmannS (1995) Struggle and legitimation. Law & Social Inquiry20(2): 339–348.
38.
Engle MerryS (2016) The rule of law and authoritarian rule: Legal politics in Sudan. Law & Social Inquiry41(2): 465–470.
39.
EwickPSilbeySS (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
FarrellyNWinC (2016) Inside Myanmar’s turbulent transformation. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies3(1): 38–47.
41.
FinkC (2013) Living Silence in Burma: Surviving Under Military Rule. London: Zed Books.
42.
FordNMillsEJZachariahR, et al. (2009) Ethics of conducting research in conflict settings. Conflict and Health3(1): 7.
FoucaultM (1994) The subject and power. In: FaubionJD (ed) Power: Essential Works of Foucault Vol. 3. New York: The New Press, pp. 326–348.
45.
FuH (2018) The July 9th (709) crackdown on human rights lawyers: Legal advocacy in an authoritarian state. Journal of Contemporary China27(112): 1–15.
46.
FuHCullenR (2008) Weiquan (rights protection) lawyering in an authoritarian state: Building a culture of public-interest lawyering. The China Journal59: 111–127.
47.
GanesanN (2017) Democratization and its implications for the resolution of ethnic conflict in Myanmar. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding5(1): 111.
48.
GilbertLMohseniP (2011) Beyond authoritarianism: The conceptualization of hybrid regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development46(3): 270.
49.
GilliganC (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
50.
GivensJW (2013) Sleeping with dragons; Politically embedded lawyers suing the Chinese state. Wisconsin International Law Journal31: 734.
51.
GobeESalaymehL (2016) Tunisia’s “revolutionary” lawyers: From professional autonomy to political mobilization. Law & Social Inquiry41(2): 311–345.
52.
GolubS (2006) A house without a foundation. In: CarothersT (ed.) Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, pp. 105–136.
53.
GolubS (2010) What is legal empowerment? An introduction. Legal Empowerment: Practitioners’ Perspectives. Rome: International Development Law Organisation (IDLO), pp. 9–18.
54.
GordonRW (2010) The role of lawyers in producing the rule of law: Some critical reflections. Theoretical Inquiries in Law11: 441.
55.
GutmannM (1993) Rituals of resistance: A critique of the theory of everyday forms of resistance. Latin American Perspectives20(2): 77.
56.
HallidayTCKarpikL (2001) Political lawyering. In: SmelserNJBaltesPB (eds) International Encyclopaedia of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 11673.
57.
HardingAOoKK (2017) Constitutionalism and Legal Change in Myanmar. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
58.
HollidayI (2014) Thinking about transitional justice in Myanmar. South East Asia Research22(2): 183–200.
59.
HuangRL (2013) Re-thinking Myanmar’s political regime: Military rule in Myanmar and implications for current reforms. Contemporary Politics19(3): 247–261.
60.
HuangRL (2017) Myanmar’s way to democracy and the limits of the 2015 elections. Asian Journal of Political Science25(1): 25–44.
ILAC/CEELI (2014) Emerging Faces: Lawyers in Myanmar. Prague: International Legal Assistance Consortium CEELI Institute.
66.
JonesL (2014a) Explaining Myanmar’s regime transition: The periphery is central. Democratization21(5): 780–802.
67.
JonesL (2014b) The political economy of Myanmar’s transition. Journal of Contemporary Asia44(1): 144–170.
68.
BaseJustice (2017a) Behind Closed Doors: Obstacles and Opportunities for Public Access to Myanmar’s Courts. Yangon: Justice Base.
69.
BaseJustice (2017b) Monitoring in Myanmar: An Analysis of Myanmar’s Compliance with Fair Trial Rights. Yangon: Justice Base.
70.
KahnJ (2007) Vladimir Putin and the rule of law in Russia. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law36: 511.
71.
KarpikL (2007) Political lawyers. In: HallidayTCKarpikLFeeleyM (eds) Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 463–494.
72.
KipgenN (2016) Myanmar: A Political History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73.
KisilowskiM (2015) The middlemen: The legal profession, the rule of law, and authoritarian regimes. Law & Social Inquiry40(3): 700–722.
74.
Kleinfeld-BeltonR (2012) Advancing the Rule of Law Abroad: Next Generation Reform. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
75.
KritzerHM (1990) The Justice Broker: Lawyers and Ordinary Litigation. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
76.
KrygierM (2006) The rule of law: An abuser’s guide. University of New South Wales Law Research Paper No. 2007-4.
77.
KrygierM (2011) Four puzzles about the rule of law: Why, what, where? And who cares?Nomos50: 64–104.
78.
KrygierM (2016) The rule of law: Pasts, presents, and two possible futures. Annual Review of Law and Social Science12: 199–229.
79.
LaclauE (2005) On Populist Reason. New York: Verso.
80.
LanghendriesBMoriceauJ (2018) Building Bridges Between Communities and Legal Services: A Study on Perceptions and Practices of Justice Seekers and Legal Aid Providers in Myanmar. Brief No. 3: Legal Aid Service Providers and the Communities they serve Rule of Law Centres Issue Brief Series, Yangon, Myanmar: International Development Law Organisation.
81.
LevitskySWayLA (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82.
LiljaMBaazMSchulzM, et al. (2017) How resistance encourages resistance: Theorizing the nexus between power, ‘Organised Resistance’ and ‘Everyday Resistance’. Journal of Political Power10(1): 40–54.
83.
LiljebladJ (2016) Transnational support and legal education reform in developing countries: Findings and lessons from Burma/Myanmar. Loyola University Chicago International Law Review14: 133.
84.
LintnerB (2017) No Justice For Slain Myanmar Lawyer U Ko Ni. The Brief, 17 June.
85.
LiuSHallidayTC (2008) Dancing handcuffed in the minefield: Survival strategies of defense lawyers in China’s criminal justice system. Center on Law and Globalization Research Paper 08–04.
86.
LiuSHallidayTC (2011) Political liberalism and political embeddedness: Understanding politics in the work of chinese criminal defence lawyers. Law and Society Review45(4): 831–865.
87.
LubanD (2005) Lawyers as upholders of human dignity (when they aren’t busy assaulting it). University of Illinois Law Review3: 815.
88.
LubanD (2010) The rule of law and human dignity: Reexamining Fuller’s canons. Hague Journal of Rule of Law2: 29–47.
89.
LwinEETNaingS (2017) ‘The death of the rule of law’: Coming to terms with the loss of U Ko Ni. The Myanmar Times, 2 February.
90.
McAuliffeP (2013) Transitional Justice and Rule of Law Reconstruction: A Contentious Relationship. Abingdon: Routledge.
91.
McCannMarch (1996) Law and everyday forms of resistance: A socio-political assessment. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society15: 207–236.
92.
McCarthyS (2018) Rule of law expedited: Land title reform and justice in Burma (Myanmar). Asian Studies Review42(2): 229–246.
93.
McEvoyK (2007) Beyond legalism: Towards a thicker understanding of transitional justice. Journal of Law and Society34(4): 411–440.
94.
McEvoyK (2011) What did the lawyers do during the ‘war’? Neutrality, conflict and the culture of quietism. The Modern Law Review74(3): 350–384.
95.
MacManusTGreenPdela Cour VenningA (2015) Countdown to Annihilation: Genocide in Myanmar. London: International State Crime Initiative.
96.
MalseedK (2009) Networks of noncompliance: Grassroots resistance and sovereignty in militarised Burma. Journal of Peasant Studies36(2): 365–391.
97.
MarcelG (1963) The Existential Background of Human Dignity: The William James Lectures, Delivered at Harvard University 1961–1962. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
98.
MarkS (2016) Are the odds of justice “stacked” against them? Challenges and opportunities for securing land claims by smallholder farmers in Myanmar. Critical Asian Studies48(3): 443–460.
99.
MarshallD (2014) The International Rule of Law Movement: A Crisis of Legitimacy and the Way Forward. Cambridge: Human Rights Program, Harvard Law School.
100.
MassoudMF (2013) Law’s Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101.
MeiliS (1998) Cause lawyers and social movements: A comparative perspective on democratic change in Argentina and Brazil. In: SaratAScheingoldS (eds) Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc., pp. 487–522.
102.
Mezey (2001) Out of the ordinary: Law, power, culture and the commonplace. Law and Social Inquiry26(1): 145–167.
103.
MinAK (2017) Judicial system needs a revamp: Lawyer. Myanmar Times, 28 June.
104.
MoliternoJE (2009) The lawyer as catalyst of social change. Fordham Law Review77: 1559.
105.
MonY (2016) Lawyers, activists press for Justice Ministry. The Myanmar Times, 17 March.
106.
MoustafaT (2003) Law versus the state: The judicialization of politics in Egypt. Law & Social Inquiry28(4): 883–930.
107.
MoustafaT (2014) Law and courts in authoritarian regimes. Annual Review of Law and Social Science10: 281–299.
108.
MungerF (2017) Rule of law inside out in Myanmar: Commentary on opposing the rule of law: How Myanmar’s courts make law and order by Nick Cheesman. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law9(1): 3–10.
109.
MungerFWCummingsSLTrubekLG (2013) Mobilizing law for justice in Asia: A comparative approach. Wisconsin International Law Journal31: 353.
110.
ParkerC (2004) A critical morality for lawyers: Four approaches to lawyers’ ethics. Monash University Law Review30: 49.
111.
PeerenboomR (2004) Varieties of rule of law: An introduction and provisional conclusion. In: PeerenboomR (ed.) Asian Discourses of Rule of Law. London: Curzon Routledge, pp. 1–53.
112.
PorterJ (2016) The Effectiveness of Bar Associations in Conflict and Crisis, Lawyers, Conflict and Transition. Belfast: Queen’s University Belfast.
113.
Prasse-FreemanE (2014) Conceptions of Justice vs. the Rule of Law. Myanmar: The Dynamics of an Evolving Polity. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
114.
Prasse-FreemanE (2015) Seeking and avoiding the law in Burma. Anthropology Today31(6): 29.
QuahJS (2016) Minimising corruption in Myanmar: An impossible dream?Asian Education and Development Studies5(2): 175–194.
118.
QuigleyF (2009) Growing political will from the grassroots: How social movement principles can reverse the dismal legacy of rule of law interventions. Columbia Human Rights Law Review41: 13.
119.
RajahJ (2012) Authoritarian Rule of Law: Legislation, Discourse and Legitimacy in Singapore. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120.
RazJ (1979) The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
121.
RenshawCM (2017) Human rights under the new regime. In: HardingAOoKK (eds) Constitutionalism and Legal Change in Myanmar. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, pp. 215–234.
122.
RoznaiY (2013) Revolutionary lawyering: On lawyers’ social responsibilities and roles during a democratic revolution. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal22: 353.
123.
SaffinJ (2012) Where are Burma’s lawyers in the transition?New mandala, Mizzima, 18 July 2012.
124.
SaffinJWillisN (2017) The legal profession and the substantive rule of law in Myanmar. In: HardingAOoKK (eds) Constitutionalism and Legal Change in Myanmar. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, pp. 235–252.
125.
SaratAScheingoldS (2001) Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ScheingoldSSaratA (2004) Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism and Cause Lawyering. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
128.
Schwöbel-PatelC (2018) The rule of law as a marketing tool: The International Criminal Court and the branding of global justice. In: MayCWinchesterA (eds) Handbook on the Rule of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 434–452.
129.
ScottJ (1986) Everyday forms of peasant resistance. The Journal of Peasant Studies13(2): 5–35.
130.
ScottJ (1989) Everyday forms of resistance. Copenhagen Papers4: 33–62.
131.
ScottJ (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
132.
ShihV (2015) Research in authoritarian regimes: Transparency tradeoffs and solutions. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research13(1): 20–22.
133.
SimpsonAFarrellyNHollidayI (2017) Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar. New York: Routledge.
SolomonPH (2007) Courts and judges in authoritarian regimes. World Politics60(1): 122–145.
138.
SolomonPH (2010) Authoritarian legality and informal practices: Judges, lawyers and the state in Russia and China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies43(4): 351–362.
139.
StrangioS (2015) Dancing with dictators: Robert Sann Aung. Southeast Asia Globe, 10 September.
140.
SummersRS (1993) A formal theory of the rule of law. Ratio Juris6(2): 16.
141.
TamW (2012) Legal Mobilization Under Authoritarianism: The Case of Post-Colonial Hong Kong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
142.
TamanahaBZ (2004) On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
143.
TamanahaBZ (2007) A concise guide to the rule of law. In: WalkerNPalombellaG (eds) Relocating the Rule of Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 3–16.
144.
ThawnghmungAM (2011) The politics of everyday life in twenty-first century Myanmar. The Journal of Asian Studies70(3): 641–656.
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (2017) Promoting the Rule of Law Project, Myanmar, Annual Report: October 2016–September 2017. Washington: United States Agency for International Development.
148.
VischerR (2011) How do lawyers serve human dignity?University of St. Thomas Law Journal9(1): 222–249.
149.
WaldronJ (2012) How law protects dignity. Cambridge Law Journal71(1): 200–222.
150.
WhiteL (2001) Two worlds of Ghanaian cause lawyers. In: ScheingoldS and SaratA (eds) Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–67.
151.
WoodEJ (2006) The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qualitative Sociology29(3): 373–386.
ZanM (2000) Judicial independence in Burma: No march backwards towards the past. Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal1: i.
154.
ZanM (2008) Legal education in Burma since the mid-1960s. Journal of Burma Studies12(1): 63–107.
155.
ZanM (2017) Rule of law concepts in Burma’s constitutions and actual practice: No ground for optimism. In: HardingAOoKK (eds) Constitutionalism and Legal Change in Myanmar. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, pp. 25–45.
