Political Violence as a Time That is Past? Engaging With Non-Participation in Transitional Justice in Cambodia

Abstract

Transitional justice scholarship has increasingly focused on participation to critically reflect upon the legitimacy and transformative potential of transitional justice. This article addresses these issues yet through a different vantage point: that of non-participation. It focuses on the case study of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal and a particular set of actors: those who continue to face political violence in Cambodia today. Thereby, it engages with the perspectives of those often overlooked in transitional justice for having opted out of the process, but also for putting forward justice claims that exceed the mandate of established transitional justice institutions. This article draws from qualitative fieldwork conducted in Cambodia between 2013 and 2016. It demonstrates the epistemic value of engaging with non-participation in transitional justice. It argues that non-participation in judicial transitional justice processes is inherently linked to the ways in which ordinary citizens experience and understand the law in their everyday life. It further highlights continuities in subjective experiences of political violence, which question discourses that political violence is a time that is past in Cambodia.

Keywords

Cambodia Khmer Rouge Tribunal/ECCC non-participation resistance transitional justice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abu-Lughod

(1990) The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist 17(1): 41–55.

Abbott

(2018) Misuse of law will do long-term damage to Cambodia. Opinion piece on 26.07.2018, International Commission of Jurists. Available at: www.icj.org/misuse-of-law-will-do-long-term-damage-to-cambodia/ (accessed 4 August 2018).

Ainley

(2014) Justifying justice: Verdicts at the ECCC. In: Justice in Conflict, Blog entry from 16.09.2014. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60175/ (accessed 05 January 2018).

Ainley

(2013) Transitional justice in Cambodia: The coincidence of power and principle. In: Renee

(ed) Transitional Justice in the Asia Pacific. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125–156. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43621/ (accessed 22 April 2016).

Anstis

(2012) Using law to impair the rights and freedoms of human rights defenders: A case study of Cambodia. Journal of Human Rights Practice 4(3): 312–333.

Beech

(2018) Cambodia re-elects its leader, a result predetermined by one. The New York Times, 29 July 2018. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2018/07/29/world/asia/cambodia-election-hun-sen.html (accessed 4 August 2018).

Blot

Guillou

(2016) Cambodge: La culture du dialogue ne fonctionne pas [In French]. In: Abigaël

Tran

(eds) L’Asie du Sud-Est 2016: Bilan, enjeux et perspectives. Paris: Irasec and Les Indes Savantes, pp. 160–188.

Brounéus

(2011) In-depth interviewing: The process, skill and ethics of interviews in peace research. In: Kristine

Öberg

(eds) Understanding Peace Research: Methods and Challenges. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 131–145.

Chandler

(2008) Cambodia deals with its past: Collective memory, demonisation and induced amnesia. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 9(2-3): 355–369.

10.

Chhim

(2012) Pacifying vindictiveness by not being vindictive: Do memory initiatives in Cambodia have a role in addressing questions of impunity?. Available at: www.impunitywatch.org/docs/Cambodia_Mem_Research_Report.pdf (accessed 22 April 2016).

11.

Chhim

(2014) A place for baksbat (broken courage) in forensic psychiatry at the ECCC. Journal of Psychiatry, Psychology and the Law 21(2): 286–296.

12.

Chy

(2014) When the Criminal Laughs. Phnom Penh: Documentation Center of Cambodia.

13.

Ciorciari

(2009) History and politics behind the Khmer Rouge trials. In: John

Heindel

(eds) On Trial: The Khmer Rouge Accountability Process. Phnom Penh: Documentation Center of Cambodia, pp. 33–84.

14.

Ciorciari

Heindel

(2014) Hybrid Justice: The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

15.

Cohen

(2001) States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.

16.

Das

(2007) Life and Words. Berkeley: University of California Press.

17.

de Greiff

(2015) Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence: Guarantees of non-recurrence. A/HRC/30/42. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/TruthJusticeReparation/Pages/AnnualReports.aspx (accessed 22 February 2017).

18.

de Greiff

(2016) Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence: The participation of victims in transitional justice measures. A/HRC/34/62. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/TruthJusticeReparation/Pages/AnnualReports.aspx (accessed 22 February 2017).

19.

Dicklitch

Malik

(2010) Justice, human rights and reconciliation in postconflict Cambodia. Human Rights Review 11: 515–530.

20.

Etcheson

(2006) A ‘fair and public trial’: A political history of the Extraordinary Chambers. Justice Initiatives (OSJI) Special Issue(Spring): 7–24.

21.

Ewick

Silbey

(1998) The Commonplace of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

22.

FIDH, LICADHO and ADHOC (2015) Shadow report for the UN human rights committee’s consideration of the second report of Cambodia. Available at: www.licadho-cambodia.org/reports/files/204FIDH-LICADHO-ADHOC-ShadowReportICCPR2014-English.pdf (accessed 02 April 2016).

23.

Fujii

(2010) Shades of truth and lies: Interpreting testimonies of war and violence. Journal of Peace Research 47(2): 231–242.

24.

Goodhand

(2000) Research in conflict zones: Ethics and accountability. Forced Migration Review 8: 12–14.

25.

Gready

Robins

(2014) From transitional to transformative justice: A new agenda for practice. International Journal of Transitional Justice 8(3): 339–361.

26.

Hammarberg

(2001) How the Khmer Rouge tribunal was agreed. Searching for the Truth, Documentation Center of Cambodia. Available at: www.d.dccam.org/Tribunal/Analysis/How_Khmer_Rouge_Tribunal.htm (accessed 30 May 2017).

27.

Heder

(2012) Cambodia: Capitalist transformation by neither liberal democracy nor dictatorship. Southeast Asian Affairs 103–115.

28.

Hinton

(2011) Introduction: Towards an anthropology of transitional justice. In: Alexander

(ed) Transitional Justice: Global Mechanisms and Local Realities after Genocide and Mass Violence. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 1–22, 34.

29.

Hinton

(2014) Justice and time at the Khmer Rouge tribunal: In memory of Vann Nath, painter and S-21 survivor. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal 8(2): 7–17.

30.

Hughes

(2001) Cambodia: Democracy or dictatorship? Southeast Asian Affairs 28: 113–128.

31.

Hughes

(2003) The Political Economy of the Cambodian Transition, 1991-2001. London; New York: Routledge Curzon.

32.

Hughes

(2015) UNTAC, peace and violence in Cambodia. In: Mandy

Kühn

(eds) The Politics of International Intervention: The Tyranny of Peace. London: Routledge, pp. 117–138.

33.

Hughes

(2015) Ordinary theatre and extraordinary law at the Khmer Rouge tribunal. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33: 714–731.

34.

Jarvis

(2014) Justice for the deceased: Victims’ participation in the ECCC. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal 8(2): 19–27.

35.

Jarvis

Fawthrop

(2004) Getting Away with Genocide? Elusive Justice and the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. London: Pluto Press.

36.

Jones

Baumgartner

Gabriel

(2015) A transformative approach to dealing with the past. swisspeace Essential 02/2015. Available at: www.swisspeace.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Media/Publications/Essentials/A_transformative_Approach_to_Dealing_with_the_Past_2015.pdf (accessed 22 April 2016).

37.

Killean

(2018) Constructing victimhood at the Khmer Rouge tribunal: Visibility, selectivity and participation. International Review of Victimology 23: 273–296.

38.

Kent

(2013) Friction and security at the Khmer Rouge tribunal. SOJOURN: Journal of Social issues in Southeast Asia 28(2): 299–328.

39.

Kent

(2016) Conflict continues: Transitioning into a battle for property in Cambodia today. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 47(1): 3–23.

40.

Lambourne

(2009) Transitional Justice and peacebuilding after mass violence. International Journal of Transitional Justice 3(1): 28–48.

41.

Lambourne (2012) Outreach, Inreach and Civil Society Participation in Transitional Justice. In: Palmer

Clark

Granville

(eds) Critical Perspectives in Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 235–61.

42.

Lemonde

(2013) Un Juge Face Aux Khmers Rouges. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

43.

LICADHO (2014) Human rights 2013: The year in review. Available at: www.licadho-cambodia.org/reports.php?perm=194 (accessed 22 April 2016).

44.

LICADHO (2015) Human rights 2014: The year in review. Available at: www.licadho-cambodia.org/reports.php?perm=209 (accessed 22 April 2016).

45.

Luco

(2002) Between a tiger and a crocodile: Management of local conflicts in Cambodia: An anthropological approach to traditional and new practices. Phnom Penh: UNESCO.

46.

(2012) Remember 17 April. Searching for the Truth, Documentation Center of Cambodia (2nd Quarter). pp. 2–8.

47.

MacGinty

(2011) International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

48.

MacGinty

(2012) Between resistance and compliance: Non-participation and the liberal peace. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 6(2): 167–187.

49.

Manning

(2017) Transitional Justice and Memory in Cambodia: Beyond the ECCC. London; New York: Routledge.

50.

Mason

(2002) Qualitative Researching, 2nd ed. London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: SAGE.

51.

Mayer-Rieckh

(2017) Guarantees of non-recurrence: An approximation. Human Rights Quarterly 39(2): 416–448.

52.

McCargo

(2005) Cambodia: Getting away with authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 16(4): 98–112.

53.

McCargo

(2011) Politics by other means. The virtual trials of the Khmer Rouge tribunal. International Affairs 87(3): 613–627.

54.

McCargo

(2014) Cambodia in 2013: (No) country for old men? Asian Survey 54(1): 71–77.

55.

McEvoy

(2018) Travel, dilemmas and nonrecurrence: Observations on the ‘respectabilisation’ of transitional justice. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 12: 185–193.

56.

McEvoy

McGregor

(eds) (2008) Transitional Justice from Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Oxford; Portland: Hart.

57.

Meisenberg

Stegmiller

(eds) (2016) The ECCC. Hague: T.M.C, Asser Press.

58.

Merry

(1985) Concepts of law and justice among working-class Americans: Ideology as culture. Legal Studies IX(1): 59–69.

59.

Mohan

(2009) The paradox of victim-centrism: Victim participation at the Khmer Rouge tribunal. International Criminal Law Review 9(5): 733–775.

60.

Morgenbesser

(2018) Misclassification on the Mekong: The origins of Hun Sen’s personalist dictatorship. Democratization 25(2): 191–208.

61.

Obradović-Wochnik

(2013). The ‘silent dilemma’ of transitional justice: Silencing and coming to terms with the past in Serbia. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 7(2): 328–347.

62.

Öjendal

Lilja

(eds) (2009). Beyond Democracy in Cambodia: Political Reconstruction in a Post-Conflict Society. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.

63.

Öjendal

(2013) From friction to hybridity in Cambodia: 20 Years of unfinished peacebuilding. Peacebuilding 1(3): 365–380.

64.

OSJI (2016) Performance and Perception: The Impact of the ECCC. OSJI. Available at: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/performance-and-perception-impact-extraordinary-chambers-court-cambodia (accessed 27 April 2016).

65.

OSJI (2011) Recent developments at the ECCC: November 2011 update. Available at: www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/recent-developments-extraordinary-chambers-courts-cambodia-november-2011 (accessed 27 April 2016).

66.

Paris

(2009) At War’s End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

67.

Petit

(2010) Lawfare and international tribunals: A question of definition? A reflection on the creation of the ‘‘Khmer Rouge tribunal’’. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 43(1/2): 189–199.

68.

Pham

Vinck

Balthazard

, et al. (2009) So we will never forget: A population-based survey on attitudes about social reconstruction and the ECCC. Available at: http://hhi.harvard.edu/publications/so-we-will-never-forget-population-based-survey-attitudes-about-social-reconstruction (accessed 27 April 2016).

69.

Poffenberger

(ed) (2013) Cambodia’s Contested Forest Domain: The Role of Community Forestry in the New Millennium. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

70.

Riaño Alcalá

Baines

(2012) Editorial note. Transitional justice and the everyday. International Journal of Transitional Justice 6(3): 385–393.

71.

Richmond

Franks

(2007) Liberal hubris? Virtual peace in Cambodia. Security Dialogue 38(1): 27–48.

72.

Roberts

(2008) Hybrid polities and indigenous pluralities: Advanced lessons in statebuilding from Cambodia. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 2(1): 63–86.

73.

Roth-Arrazia

(2006) Measures of non-repetition in transitional justice: The missing link? Legal Studies Research Paper Series, University of California, No 171, pp. 1–42.

74.

Schoenberger

Beban

(2018) ‘They turn us into criminals’: Embodiments of fear in Cambodian land grabbing. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108(5): 1–16.

75.

Shaw

Waldorf

(eds) (2010) Localizing Transitional Justice: Interventions and Priorities after Mass Violence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

76.

Silbey

(2005) After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1(1): 323–368.

77.

Smith

(2017) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Cambodia. A/HRC/36/61.

78.

Sperfeldt

(2012) Collective reparations at the extraordinary chambers in the courts of Cambodia. International Criminal Law Review 12(3): 457–490.

79.

Springer

(2013) Violent accumulation: A postanarchist critique of property, dispossession, and the state of exception in neoliberalizing Cambodia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103(3): 608–626.

80.

Sriram

(2007) Justice as peace? Liberal peacebuilding and strategies of transitional justice. Global Society 21(4): 579–591.

81.

Stover

Balthazard

Koenig

(2011) Confronting Duch: Civil party participation in case 001 at the ECCC. International Review of the Red Cross 93: 503–546.

82.

Studzinsky

(2011) Neglected crimes: The challenge of raising sexual and gender-based crimes before the ECCC. In: Susanne

Stanley

(eds) Gender in Transitional Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 88–112.

83.

Subedi

(2014) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Cambodia. A/HRC/27/70.

84.

Theidon

(2009) Editorial note. International Journal of Transitional Justice 3(3): 295–300.

85.

Thomas

Chy

(2009) Including the survivors in the tribunal process. In: Ciorciari

Heindel

(eds) On Trial: The Khmer Rouge accountability process. Phnom Penh: Documentation Center of Cambodia, pp. 214–293.

86.

(2009) The judicial system and democratization in post-conflict Cambodia. In: Joakim

Lilja

(eds) Beyond Democracy in Cambodia: Political Reconstruction in a Post-Conflict Society. Copenhagen: NIAS Press, pp. 70–100.

87.

(2011) Cambodia: Moving away from democracy? International Political Science Review 32(5): 546–562.

88.

(2013) The Cambodian people have spoken. The New York Times, 9 August. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2013/08/10/opinion/global/the-cambodian-people-have-spoken.html?_r=0 (accessed 22 April 2016).

89.

Ledgerwood

(2010) Is the trial of ‘Duch’ a catalyst for change in Cambodia’s courts. Asia Pacific Issues. Analysis from the East West Center 95.

90.

UN Group of Experts (1999) Report of the group of experts for Cambodia established pursuant to general assembly resolution 52/135. Available at: www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cambodia-1999.html (accessed 31 October 2015).

91.

UNDP (2007) A Case Study of Indigenous Traditional Legal Systems and Conflict Resolution in Rattanakiri and Mondulkiri Provinces, Cambodia: Executive Summary. Phnom Penh: Cambodian Ministry of Justice and Ministry of Interior and UNDP Cambodia.

92.

UNSG (2018) Role and achievements of the office of the UN high commissioner for human rights in assisting the government and people of Cambodia in the promotion and protection of human rights. Report of the Secretary General, 2 February 2018. A/HRC/37/64.

93.

Urs

(2007) Imagining locally-motivated accountability for mass atrocities: Voices from Cambodia. Sur. International Journal on Human Rights 7: 61–99.

94.

Wood

(2006) The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qualitative Sociology 29(3): 373–386.

95.

Yrigoen

Raquel

Rady

, et al. (2005). Pathways to Justice: Access to Justice with a Focus on the Poor, Women and Indigenous Peoples, Cambodia. New York; Phnom Penh: UNDP and the Cambodian Ministry of Justice.