Legislation on abortion in Poland is among the strictest of all European countries. As with Malta and Ireland, the regulations in Poland do not allow for the termination of a pregnancy on the grounds of the difficult social or economic situation of a woman. Post-1989 developments with regard to abortion law in Poland show the influence of the Catholic Church as a very powerful societal actor on the drafting and implementation of one of the most important policies affecting women’s rights and gender relations. Catholic ‘pro-life’ circles exercised pressure in the process of drafting and adopting the new law, as well as at the stage of the law’s implementation. The symbolic victory of the Church over abortion law is evident in the shift in general discourse and in the official language of legal acts, where, for example, ‘foetus’ has been replaced by ‘conceived child’ (in the law) or by ‘unborn child’ (in discourse). As a consequence, for public opinion abortion is seen as tantamount to ‘the act of killing the unborn child’.
CBOS (2014) Klauzula sumienia lekarza i farmaceuty. Warsaw: CBOS.
7.
ChałubińskiM (1994) Polityka, kościół aborcja. In: ChałubińskiM (ed.) Polityka i aborcja. Warszawa: Scholar, pp. 89–153.
8.
ChełstowskaA (2009) Krótka historia aborcji. In: CzerwińskaAPiotrowskaJ (eds) Raport: 20 lat-20 zmian. Kobiety w Polsce w okresie transformacji 1989-2009. Warszawa: Fundacja Feminoteka, pp. 11–30.
9.
ConditCM (1990) Decoding Abortion Rhetoric: Communication Social Change. Chicago: Universoty of Illinois Press.
10.
DeaconB (1993) Developments in eastern-European social policy. In: JonesC (ed) New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe. London: Routledge, pp. 177–197.
11.
DrezgićR (2010) Religion, Politics and Gender in the Context of Nation-State Formation: the case of Serbia. Third World Quarterly31(6): 955–970.
12.
FidelisM (2010) Women, Communism, and Industrialization in Postwar Poland. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FinkS (2009) Churches as societal veto players: Religious influence in actor-centred theories of policy-making. West European Politics32(1): 77–96.
14.
FletcherR (2005) Reproducing Irishness: Race, Gender, and Abortion Law. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law17: 365–404.
15.
FodorEGlassCKawachiJ. (2002) Family policies and gender in Hungary, Poland and Romania. Communist and Post-Communism Studies35: 475–490.
16.
FuchsG (2013) Using strategic litigation for women’s rights: Political restrictions in Poland and achievements of the women’s movement. European Journal of Women’s Studies20(1): 21.
17.
FuszaraM (1991) Will the abortion issue give birth to feminism in Poland? In: McleanMGrovesD (eds) Women’s Issues in Social Policy. London: Routledge, pp. 205–228.
18.
GalSKligmanG (2000) Reproducing Gender: Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life After Socialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
GaudynM (2011) Lata dwudzieste, lata współczesne. In: Snochowska-GonzalezC (ed) A jak hipokryzja. Antologia tekstów o aborcji, władzy, pieniądzach i sprawiedliwości. Warsaw: O Matko!, pp. 106–123.
21.
GraffA (2003) Lost between the Waves? The paradoxes of feminist chronology and activism in contemporary Poland. Journal of International Women’s Studies4(2): 100–116.
22.
GrzywaczAJawieńAKacpuraK. (2013) 20 lat tzw ustawy antyaborcyjnej w Posce. Raport 2013. Warsaw: Polish Federation for Women and Family Planning.
23.
HeinenJPortetS (2009) Religia, polityka i równość płci w Polsce. Końcowy raport badawczy podsumowujący projekt, Religion, Politics and Gender Equality”. Warszawa: Heinrich Boell Stiftung
24.
HeinenJPortetS (2010) Reproductive Rights in Poland: When politicians fear the wrath of the Church. Third World Quarterly31(6): 1007–1021.
25.
IrelandEJ (2013) Do not abort the mission: An analysis of the european court of human rights case of R.R. v. Poland. North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation38(2): 651–695.
JonesH (2011) A Guide to Monitoring and Evaluating Policy Influence. Barckground Note. London: Overseas Development Institute.
28.
KeinzA (2011) European desires and national bedrooms? Negotiating “normalcy” in postsocialist Poland. Central European History44(1): 92.
29.
KellyK (2014) The spread of ‘Post Abortion Syndrome’ as social diagnosis. Social Science & Medicine102: 18–25.
30.
KnillCPreidelCNebelK (2014) Brake rather than Barrier: The impact of the catholic church on morality policies in Western Europe. West European Politics37(5): 845.
31.
KramerA-M (2009) The Polish parliament and the making of politics through abortion: Nation, gender and democracy in the 1996 liberalization amendment debate. International Feminist Journal of Politics11(1): 81–101.
Kuźma-MarkowskaS (2011) Aborcja, eugenika, totalitaryzm – czyli czy(m) różniło się przerywanie ciąży “za Hitlera” i “za Stalina”. In: Snochowska-GonzalezC (ed) A jak hipokryzja. Antologia tekstów o aborcji, władzy, pieniądzach i sprawiedliwości. Warsaw: Heinrich Boll Stiftung.
MishtalJ (2015) The Politics of Morality. The Church, the State, and Reproductive Rights in Postsocialist Poland. Athens: Ohio University Press.
36.
MishtalJDanneferR (2010) Reconciling religious identity and reproductive practices: The Church and contraception in Poland. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care15(4): 232–242.
NowakowskaU (1997) The new right fundamentalism. In RenneT (ed) Ana’s Land: Sisterhood in Eastern Europe. Boulder: Westview Press.
39.
NowickaW (1996) Roman catholic fundamentalism against women’s reproductive rights in Poland. Reproductive Health Matters8: 21–29.
40.
NowickaW (2007). Ustawa antyaborcyjna w Polsce – stan prawny i rzeczywistość. In: NowickaW (ed) Prawa Reprodukcyjne w Polsce: Skutki ustawy antyaborcyjnejWarsaw: Polish Federation for Women and Family Planning.
41.
PailheA (2000) Gender discrimination in Central Europe during the systemic transition. Economics of Transition8(2): 505–535.
42.
PascallGLewisJ (2004) Emerging gender regimes and policies for gender equality in a wider Europe. Journal of European Social Policy33(3): 373–394.
PriaulxN (2008) Testing the margin of appreciation: Therapeutic abortion, reproductive ‘rights’ and the intriguing case of Tysiąc v. Poland. European Journal of Health Law15(4): 361–379.
45.
RenneT (1997) Ana’s Land: Sisterhood in Eastern Europe. Boulder: Westview Press.
46.
SaxonbergSSirovatkaT (2005) Gender attitudes and social policy after communism. In: Third Annual ESPAnet Conference “Making Social Policy in the Postindustrial Age”, University of Fribourg, Switzerland, 22–24 September, 2005.
47.
SchreiberJC (2011) Parenting, policies, and practice: Christian influence on child welfare in America. Social Work & Christianity38(3): 293–314.
48.
ŚlipkoTStarowieyskiM. (2010) Aborcja: spojrzenie filozoficzne, teologiczne, historyczne i prawne. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Petrus.
49.
SpivakG C (2009), Nationalism and the Imagination. Lectora, 15: 75–98.
TitkowA (1995) Kobiety pod presją? Proces kształtowania się tosamości. In TitkowADomańskiH (eds) Co to znaczy być kobietą w Polsce. Warsaw: IFiS PAN, pp. 36–37.
52.
TitkowA (2007) Tożsamość polskich kobiet. Ciągłość zmiana konteksty. Warsaw: IFiS PAN.
53.
Wydawnictwo SióstrLoretanek (1997) Głośmy Ewangelię życia: Antologia tekstów i wypowiedzi z przebiegu walki o prawo do życia dzieci nie narodzonych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sióstr Loretanek.
54.
ZielinskiH (2000) Żółw Achillesa, pięta Majcherka, Polemika do tekstu red. Janusza A. Majcherka z “Rzeczpospolitej” [Achilles’s Turtle, Majcherek’s heel, polemics with the text by Janusz A. Majcherek from ‘Rzeczpospolita’]. Niedziela6/2000. Available athttp://www.niedziela.pl/artykul/63881/nd/Zolw-Achillesa-pieta-Majcherka, accessed on 8th of September 2016.
