In the past 20 years, Canada has seen an increasing tendency to use the criminal law as a means of enforcing norms of safe sex and disclosure among the HIV-positive population – particularly the law of sexual assault. Although the structure of individual rights that underlies the law of sexual assault is conceptually distinct from norms produced through governmental power, this article shows that it is often difficult to draw clear distinctions between the two. An analysis that focuses strictly on individual rights is unsatisfactory because it fails to account for the social nature of our expectations of responsibility and trust. At the same time, when the individual right derives its content by absorbing a norm produced through governmental power, it fails to provide a principled discourse for future decision – making.
BuellS (2006) Novel criminal fraud. New York University Law Review81: 1971–2043.
3.
CastelleR (1991) From dangerousness to risk. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 281–298.
4.
DavisMHartGBoldingG. (2006) Sex and the Internet: Gay men, risk reduction and serostatus. Culture, Health & Sexuality8: 161–174.
5.
DeanM (1997) Sociology after society. In OwenD (ed) Sociology After Postmodernism. London: SAGE, pp. 205–228.
6.
DworkinR (1997) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
EwaldF (1991a) Norms, discipline and the law. In: PostR (ed) Law and the Order of Culture. Berkley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 138–161.
8.
EwaldF (1991b) Insurance and risks. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in GovernmentalityChicago, IL: University of Chigaco Press, pp. 197–210.
9.
GolderBFitzpatrickP (2009) Foucault’s Law. New York: Routledge-Cavendish.
10.
GordonMRigerS (1989) The Female Fear. New York, NY: Free Press.
11.
GrantI (2008) The boundaries of the criminal law: The criminalization of the nondisclosure of HIV. Dalhousie Law Journal31
(1): 123–180.
12.
GrantI (2013) The over-criminalization of persons with HIV. University of Toronto Law Journal63
(3): 475–484.
13.
HuntA (2003) Risk and moralization in everyday life. In: EricsonRDoyleA (eds.) Risk and Morality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 165–192.
14.
HuntAWickhamG (1994) Foucault and Law: Toward a Sociology of Law as GovernanceLondon; Boulder: Pluto Press.
15.
HutchinsonAC (1995) Waiting for CORAF: A Critique of Law and Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
16.
KinsmanG (1996) Responsibility as a strategy of governance: Regulating people living with AIDS and lesbians and gay men in Ontario. Economy and Society25
(3): 393–409.
17.
KippaxSConnellRWDowsettGW. (1993) Sustaining Safe Sex: Gay Communities Respond to AIDS. London: The Falmer Press.
18.
KramarKJochelsonR (2011) Sex and the Supreme Court: Obscenity and Indecency Laws in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
19.
LaceyN (1998) Unspeakable subjects, impossible rights: Sexuality, integrity and criminal law. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence11: 47–68.
20.
LuptonD (1999) Risk and Sociolcultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
MacKinnonECromptonC (2012) The gender of lying: Feminist perspectives on the non-disclosure of HIV status. University of British Columbia Law Review45: 407–447.
22.
MadrizE I (1997) Images of criminals and victims: a study on women’s fear and social control. Gender and Society11: 342–356.
23.
MunroVE (2001) Legal feminism and Foucault: A critique of the expulsion of law. Journal of Law and Society28
(4): 546–567.
24.
MykhalovskiyEBetteridgeGMcLayD (2010) HIV Non-Disclosure and Criminal Law: Establishing Policy Options for Ontario. Report: Ontario HIV Treatment Network.
25.
NedelskyJ (2011) Law’s Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
O’MalleyP (1996) Risk and responsibility. In: BarryAOsborneTRoseN (eds) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: University of London Press, pp. 189–207.
27.
O’MalleyP (1998) Risk, power, and crime prevention. In: O’MalleyP (ed) Crime and the Risk Society. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 71–94.
28.
PildesR (1998) Why rights are not trumps. Journal of Legal Studies27: 725–763.
29.
RaceK (2007) Engaging in a culture of barebacking: Gay men and the risk of HIV prevention. In: Hannah-MoffatKO’MalleyP (eds) Gendered Risk. London; New York: Routledge-Cavendish, pp. 99–126.
30.
RoseN (2008) The death of the social? In: MillerPRoseN (eds) Governing the Present. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 84–113.
31.
RoseNValverdeM (1998) Governed by law?Social & Legal Studies7(4): 541–551.
32.
RoseNO’MalleyPValverdeM (2006) Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science2: 83–104.
33.
ShafferM (2013) Sex, lies, and HIV: Mabior and the concept of sexual fraud. University of Toronto Law Journal63
(3): 466–474.
34.
SmartC (1989) Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.
35.
StankoE (1997) Safety talk: Conceptualizing women’s risk assessment as a ‘technology of the soul’. Theoretical Criminology1: 479.
36.
SteelA (2010) Describing dishonest means: The implications of seeing ‘dishonest’ as a course of conduct or mental element and the parallels with indecency. Adelaide Law Review31
(7): 7–45.
37.
StewartH (2004) When does fraud vitiate consent? A comment on R. v. Williams. Criminal Law Quarterly (49): 144–165.
38.
SymingtonA (2013) Injustice amplified by HIV non-disclosure ruling. University of Toronto Law Journal63
(3): 485–495.
39.
TadrosV (1998) Between governance and discipline: The law and Michel Foucault. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies18: 75–103.
40.
TaylorC (1985) Atomism. In: Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–210.
41.
ValverdeM (2003) Law’s Dream of a Common Knowledge. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
42.
ValverdeM (2006) The sociology of law as a ‘means of struggle against itself’. Social and Legal Studies15(4): 591–597.
43.
WeaitM (2007) Intimacy and Responsibility: The Criminalization of HIV Transmission. New York, NY: Routledge-Cavendish.
44.
YoungD (2008) Claims for recognition and the generalized other: The reasonable person and judgment in criminal law. Canadian Journal of Law and Society23
(1): 15–37.
45.
R. v. Aziga [2011] O.J. No. 3525.
46.
R. v. Clarence [1888] 22 Q.B.D. 23.
47.
R. v. Cuerrier [1998] 2 S.C.R. 371, S.C.J. No. 64.
48.
R. v. D.C. [2008] J.Q. no 994, QCCQ 629.
49.
R. v. Edwards [2001], NSSC 80, 194 N.S.R. (2d) 107, 50 W.C.B. (2d) 255.
50.
R. v. Ewanchuk [1999] 1 S.C.R. 330, 169 D.L.R. (4th) 193, 131 C.C.C. (3d) 481.
51.
R. v. Hutchinson [2014] S.C.J. No. 19, (2014) 371 D.L.R. (4th) 187, 308 C.C.C. (3d) 413.
52.
R. v. J.A.T. [2010] B.C.J. No. 1024, (2010) BCSC 766.
53.
R. v. J.T. [2008] B.C.J. No. 2831, (2008), 288 B.C.A.C. 1, 256 C.C.C. (3d) 246.
54.
R. v. Lavallee [1990] 1 S.C.R. 852, 76 C.R. (3d) 329, 55 C.C.C. (3d) 97.
55.
R. v. Mabior [2008], 230 Man. R. 92d) 184, 78 W.C.B. (2d) 380.
56.
R. v. Mabior [2012] SCC 47, 96 C.R. (6th) 1, 434 N.R. 341.
57.
R. v. McGregor [2008] O.J. No. 4939, (2008), 240 C.C.C. (3d) 102, 94 O.R. (3d) 500.
58.
R. v. Mekonnen [2009], O.J. No. 5766, ONCJ 643.
59.
R. v. Mercer [1993] N.J. No 198, 110 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 41, 84 C.C.C. (3d) 41
60.
R. v. Mugford [1990] N.J. No 200, 86 NFLD & PEIR 91, 58 C.C.C. (3d) 172.
61.
R. v. Murphy [2013] O.J. No. 3903.
62.
R. v. Nduwayo [2010] B.C.J. No. 1787, (2010), BCSC 1277.
63.
R. v. Ssenyonga [1993] O.J. No. 3273 (Ont. Ct. Gen. Div.)
