Residential home (that is, housing) inspection has been a growth industry in Canada and the United States since its emergence in the 1970s. Within a legal context where the purchase of used housing is governed by the doctrine of caveat emptor, and a political and economic context characterized by prudentialism, home inspection appears to offer a means by which consumers can discharge their legal and political duty to be prudent. However, in Canada, because home inspection is largely unregulated and market driven, consumers of pre-owned housing are placed at a structural disadvantage relative to home inspectors. This article argues that we should be cautious of embracing private residential home inspection as an adequate consumer protection mechanism or form of risk consulting because there are fundamental and irreconcilable differences between a public service that strives to meet the objective of the public good and home inspection as a private service offered for public consumption that strives to meet the objectives of private interests.
Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation [CMHC] (2007) Hiring a Home Inspector. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
11.
Canadian National Association of Certified Home Inspectors [CNACHI] (2011) Standards of practice. Available at: http://www.cannachi.org/standards-of-practice(accessed 1 February 2012).
12.
CarsonADunlopR (1982) Inspecting a House: A Guide for Buyers, Owners and Renovators. Toronto, Canada: Stoddart.
13.
ChristieN (2000) Crime Control as Industry: Towards Gulags Western Style. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
Consumer Protection British Columbia [Business Practices and Consumer Protection Authority of British Columbia] (2010) Available at: http://www.consumerprotectionbc.ca(accessed 18 February 2010).
15.
CruikshankB (1993) The will to empower: Technologies of citizenship and the war on poverty. Socialist Review23(4): 29–55.
16.
CruikshankB (1997) Revolutions within: Self-government and self-esteem. In: OsborneBRoseN (eds) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 231–251.
17.
DavisJWalkerC (1975) Buying Your House: A Complete Guide to Inspection and Evaluation. Buchanan, NY: Emerson Books Inc.
18.
DeanM (1995) Governing the unemployed self in an active society. Economy and Society24: 559–583.
19.
DeanM (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
DowdK (2009) Moral hazard and the financial crisis. Cato Journal29(1): 141–166.
21.
EricsonRDoyleABarryD (2003) Insurance as Governance. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
22.
EtgarM (1976) Service performance of insurance distributors. The Journal of Risk and Insurance43(3): 487–499.
23.
FeeleyM (2002) Entrepreneurs of punishment: The legacy of privatization. Punishment and Society4(3): 321–344.
24.
GarlandD (1996) The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology36(4): 445–471.
25.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
HeelasPMorrisP (1992) Enterprise culture: Its value and values. In: HeelasPMorrisP (eds) The Values of the Enterprise Culture: The Moral Debate. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1–25.
27.
HermerJHuntA (1996) Official graffiti of the everyday. Law & Society Review30(3): 455–480.
28.
International Association of Certified Home Inspectors [InterNACHI] (2010) Residential standards of practice. Available at: http://www.nachi.org/sop.htm(accessed 1 February 2012).
29.
JessopB (1993) Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-Fordist political economy. Studies in Political Economy40: 7–40.
30.
KemshallH (2011) Crime and risk: Contested territory for risk theorising. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice39: 218–229.
31.
LandryJF (1977) Fourth report of the consumer protection project: Consumer protection of the purchasers of new and used homes. Report for the Law Reform Division, Department of Justice. New Brunswick, Canada.
32.
LarnerW (2000) Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy63: 5–25.
33.
LillyJRKnepperP (1993) The corrections-commercial complex. Crime & Delinquency39(2): 150–166.
34.
LoaderI (1999) Consumer culture and the commodification of policing and security. Sociology33(2): 373–392.
35.
ManderscheidD (2001) Caveat emptor and the sale of land: The erosion of a doctrine. Alberta Law Review39(2): 441–452.
36.
MarshG (2007) The liability of home inspectors in residential real estate sales. Atlanta Law Review59: 107–160.
37.
MarshallT (2002) Mandatory home inspections on resale homes in Ontario. Report, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, Canada.
38.
McCamusJ (2003) Caveat emptor: The position at common law. In: PerellPTroisterS (eds) Real Property Law. Toronto, Canada: Irwin Law, pp. 97–119.
39.
McNeillJ (1979) Principles of Home Inspection: A Guide to Residential Construction, Inspection and Maintenance. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
NewburnT (2001) The commodification of policing: Security networks in the late modern city. Urban Studies38(5/6): 829–845.
42.
NixonRJ (1982) Protection for the purchaser against defects in used housing: The emerging home inspection profession. Osgoode Hall Law Journal20(1): 155–190.
43.
O’MalleyK (1993) House inspection in the USA and Canada. Structural Survey11(3): 252–257.
44.
O’MalleyP (1991) Legal networks and domestic security. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society11: 171–190.
45.
O’MalleyP (1996) Post-social criminologies: Some implications of current political trends for criminological theory and practice. Current Issues in Criminal Justice8(1): 26–38.
46.
O’MalleyP (1997) Risk and responsibility. In: OsborneBRoseN (eds) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 189–207.
47.
O’MalleyP (2000) Risk societies and the government of crime. In: BrownMPrattJ (eds) Dangerous Offenders. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 17–33.
48.
O’MalleyP (2010) Crime and Risk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
PalysT (2003) Research Decisions. Toronto, Canada: Harcourt-Brace.
50.
ParentiC (1999) Big bucks from the big house: The prison industrial complex and beyond. In: Lockdown America: Police and Prisons in the Age of Crisis. New York, NY: Verso, pp. 211–244.
51.
PearceFSniderL (1995) Regulating capitalism. In: PearceFSniderL (eds) Corporate Crime: Contemporary Debates. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, pp. 19–47.
52.
PearceFTombsS (1998) Toxic Capitalism: Corporate Crime and the Chemical Industry. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
PennerD (2010) Home inspection remains a buyer-beware environment: Many homeowners confused by standards, unaware of potential conflicts of interest. Vancouver Sun, 9January, E1.
55.
PetersMA (2005) The newprudentialism in education: Actuarial rationality and the entrepreneurial self. Educational Theory55(2): 123–137.
56.
Professional Home and Property Inspectors of Canada [PHPIC] (2011) Standards of practice. Available at: http://phpic.ca/pdf/PHPIC_SOP.pdf(accessed 1 February 2012).
57.
PurvisTHuntA (1999) Citizenshipversus identity: Transformations in the discourses and practices of citizenship. Social & Legal Studies8: 457–482.
RiceJPrinceM (2000) TheChanging Politics of Canadian Social Policy. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
60.
RigakosG (2002) The New Parapolice: Risk Markets and Commodified Social Control. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
61.
RoseN (1992) Governing the enterprising self. In: HeelasPMorrisP (eds) The Values of the Enterprise Culture: The Moral Debate. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 141–164.
62.
RoseN (1996) The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy & Society25: 327–356.
63.
RoseNMillerP (1992) Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology43(2): 173–205.
64.
SchlosserE (1998) The prison industrial complex. Atlantic Monthly282(6): 51–77.
TeepleG (2000) Globalization and the Decline of Social Reform. Aurora, Canada: Garamond Press.
74.
VardyJWattieC (2001) Shopping is patriotic, leaders say: Chretien, Bush and Blair propose spending spree as antidote to post-terror recession. National Post, 28 December, A1.
75.
WaltersWM (1997) The ‘active society’: New designs for social policy. Policy and Politics25(3): 221–234.
76.
WebbJSeilerM (2003) Home inspections and the real estate licensee. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education6(2): 217–224.
77.
WeinbergerA (1996) Let the buyer be well informed: Doubting the demise of caveat emptor. Maryland Law Review55: 387–424.
78.
WeislederM (2009) Be careful with wording on home inspection clause: Although it's a common condition in house deals, it’s often misunderstood. The Toronto Star, 18 September, C02.
79.
Cresswell-Jones v Segouin [2008] (c.o.b. About the House Home Inspection), O.J. No. 1110. Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
80.
Salgado v Toth [2009] BCJ No. 2230. British Columbia Supreme Court 1515.
