The article discusses judicial activism in the light of research into the attitudes of English judges, and a comparator group of US judges, towards judicial selection, judicial training and sentencing practice. Noting commonalities and shared perspectives, it is argued that the findings indicate enduring features of occupational culture that originate in relations within the legal workgroup and the practical craft of judging. Against the context of highly conventional attitudes, a conservative form of judicial activism is found in respect of resistance to legislative and policy innovation.
Baum L. ( 2006) Judges and their Audiences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
Blaustein A. and Porter C. ( 1954) The American Lawyer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Blumberg A. ( 1967) The practice of law as a confidence game. Law and Society Review1: 15-39.
4.
Cowan D. and Hitchings E. ( 2007) ‘Pretty boring stuff’: District judges and housing possession proceedings. Social & Legal Studies16: 363-382.
5.
Dmaska M. ( 2004) Symposium on guilty plea: PartI. Journal of International Criminal Justice2(4): 1018-1032.
6.
Dmaska M. ( 2005) Assignment of counsel and perceptions of fairness. Journal of International Criminal Justice3(1): 1-4.
7.
Dworkin R. ( 1977) Taking Rights Seriously. MAHarvard University Press.
8.
Eisenstein J. and Jacob H. ( 1977) Felony Justice. Boston: Little, Brown.
9.
Fielding N (ed.) (2002) Interviewing (Section on interviewing special respondents: elites). London: Sage Publications.
10.
Fielding N. ( 2006) Courting Violence: Offence Against the Person Cases in Court. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Fielding N. and Macintyre M. ( 2005) Access grid nodes in field research. Sociological Research Online11(2), 2006, http:www.socresonline.org.uk/11/2/fielding.html .
12.
Franko Aas K. ( 2005) Sentencing in the Age of Information. London: Glasshouse.
13.
Fuller L. ( 1978) The forms and limits of adjudication. Harvard Law Review92: 353-409.
14.
Galanter M. ( 1983) The radiating effects of courts. In: Boyum K and Mather L (eds) Empirical Theories about Courts. New York: Longmans, 117-142.
15.
Galanter M., Palen F. and Thomas J. ( 1979) The crusading judge: Judicial activism in trial courts . Southern California Law Review52: 699-741.
16.
Genn H. ( 2009) Judging Civil Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Gibson G. ( 1978) Judges’ role orientations, attitudes and decisions . American Political Science Review72: 911-918.
18.
Griffith J. ( 1997) The Politics of the Judiciary, 5th edn. London: Fontana.
19.
Hale B. ( 2005) Making a difference? Why we need a more diverse judiciary . Northern Ireland Law Quarterly56(3): 281-292.
20.
Hawkins K (ed.) (1992) The Uses of Discretion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Hogarth J. ( 1971) Sentencing as a Human Process. Toronto : Toronto University Press.
22.
Hood R. ( 1992) Race and Sentencing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
Kritzer H. ( 1990) The Justice Broker. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Kritzer H. ( 1998) Legal Advocacy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
25.
Kritzer H. ( 2007) Toward a theorization of craft. Social & Legal Studies16: 321-340.
26.
Lind A. and Tyler T. ( 1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
27.
Macdonald K. ( 1995) The Sociology of Professions. London : Sage.
28.
Mack K. and Anleu S. ( 2007) ‘Getting through the list’: Judgecraft and legitimacy in the lower courts. Social & Legal Studies16: 341-361.
29.
Malleson K. ( 2006a) The Judicial Appointments Commission in England and Wales . In: Malleson K and Russell P (eds) Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
30.
Malleson K. ( 2006b) Re-thinking the merit principle in judicial selection . Journal of Law and Society33: 126-135.
31.
Moorhead R. ( 2007) The passive arbiter: Litigants in person and the challenge to neutrality. Social & Legal Studies16: 405-424.
32.
Moorhead R. and Cowan D. ( 2007) Judgecraft: An introduction. Social & Legal Studies16: 315-320.
33.
Moran L. ( 2006) Judicial diversity and the challenge of sexuality. Sydney Law Review28: 565-598.
34.
Munro C. and Wasik M. ( 1992) Sentencing, Judicial Discretion and Judicial Training . London: Sweet and Maxwell.
35.
O’Brien D. ( 2004) Judges on Judging. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
36.
Parsons T. ( 1954) Essays in Sociological Theory. New York: Free Press.
37.
Rackley E. ( 2007) Judicial diversity, the woman judge, and fairy tale endings . Legal Studies27(1): 74-94.
38.
Riesman D. ( 1957) Law and sociology. In: Riesman D, Abundance for What, and Other Essays. London: Chatto and Windus.
39.
Rosett A. and Cressey D. ( 1976) Justice by Consent: Plea Bargains in the American Courthouse . New York: J.B. Lippincott & Co.
40.
Schön D. ( 1983) The Reflective Practitioner. New York : Basic Books.
41.
Scott M. and Lyman S. ( 1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review33: 46-62.
42.
Shute S., Hood R., and Seemungal F. ( 2005) A Fair Hearing? Ethnic Minorities in the Criminal Courts . Cullompton: Willan.
43.
Tata C. ( 2007) Sentencing as craftwork and the binary epistemologies of the discretionary decision process. Social & Legal Studies16: 425-447.
44.
Thomas C. ( 2010) Are Juries Fair?Research Series1/10. London: Ministry of Justice.
45.
Thomas D. ( 1963) Sentencing: The case for reasoned decisions. Criminal Law Review10: 245-253.
46.
Webley L. and Duff L. ( 2007) Women solicitors as a barometer for problems within the legal profession. Journal of Law and Society34(3): 374-402.
