Taking the media reaction to Brenda Hale’s appointment to the appellate
committee of the House of Lords in January 2004 as its starting point, this article
considers the impact difference might have on understandings of both the judge and
judging. It argues that beneath the surface of the somewhat simplistic
personality-based alternatives posited in the British press lies a more organic
response to the woman judge generally and her perceived difference. Drawing on
Hale’s potential for difference in relation to familial (dis)connection,
unwanted parenthood and indecent assault, the article concludes that, far from being
a malevolent threat, the perceived difference of the woman judge offers an
opportunity to consider the possibility of alternative adjudicative approaches and
new understandings of the judge.
Anon
(2004b)
‘Now That’s What I Call a Privy, Counsellor’
, The Times, 9 November.
5.
Atkins, Susan
and
Brenda Hoggett
(1984) Women and the Law.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
6.
Baron, Jane
and
Julia Epstein
(1997)
‘Is Law Narrative?’
, Buffalo Law Review45:
141-187
.
7.
Berns, Sandra
(1990) To Speak as a Judge: Difference, Voice and
Power.
Dartmouth: Ashgate
.
8.
Berns, Sandra
and
Paul Baron
(1994)
‘Bloody Bones: A Legal Ghost Story and Entertainment in Two
Voices - To Speak as a Judge’
, Australian Feminist Law Journal2:
125-149
.
9.
Bowley, Martin
(2004)
‘Law Lady’
, CounselFebruary:
20-21
.
10.
Conaghan, Joanne
(2003)
‘Tort Law and Feminist Critique’
, Current Legal Problems56:
175-209
.
11.
Cruickshank, Elizabeth
(ed.) (2003) Women in the Law: Strategic Career
Management.
London: The Law Society
.
12.
Doughty, Steve
(2003)
‘The First Lady of the Law Lords (and She Wants to Abolish Marriage)’
, Daily Mail, 24 October.
13.
Dyer, Clare
(2003)
‘First Woman Law Lord Makes Case for Defence’
, The Guardian, 6 November.
14.
Gall, Gerald
(1996) The Canadian Legal System.
Ottawa: Canadian Judicial Council
.
15.
Graycar, Regina
(1995) ‘The Gender of Judgments: An
Introduction’, pp. 262-282 in
M. Thornton
(ed.) Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates.
Sydney: Oxford University Press
.
16.
Graycar, Regina
(2004) ‘Claire
L’Heureux-Dubé: Reflections from Down
Under’, pp. 81-107 in
E. Sheehy
(ed.) Adding Feminism to Law: The Contributions of Justice Claire
L’Heureux-Dubé.
Toronto: Irwin Law
.
17.
Hale, Brenda
(1996) From the Test Tube to the Coffin: Choice and
Regulation in Private Life.
London: Sweet & Maxwell
.
18.
Hale, Brenda
(1998)
‘Private Lives and Public Duties: What Is Family Law For?’
, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law20(2):
125-136
.
19.
Hale, Brenda
(1999)
‘The View from Court 45’
, Child and Family Law Quarterly11(4):
377-386
.
20.
Hale, Brenda
(2001a)
‘Equality and the Judiciary: Why Should We Want More Women Judges?’
, Public LawAutumn:
489-504
.
21.
Hale, Brenda
(2001b) ‘The Value of Life and the Cost of Living:
Damages for Wrongful Birth’. Available at: http://www.actuaries.org.uk/files/pdf/library/staple_inn_read_2001.pdf.
22.
Hale, Brenda
(2002)
‘Judging Women and Women Judging’
, CounselAugust:
10-12
.
23.
Hale, Brenda
(2003)
‘Equality in the Judiciary: A Tale of Two Continents’
, 10th Pilgrim Fathers’ Lecture.
24.
Hale, Brenda
(2004a)
‘The Lady and Their Lordships’
, Independent Review, 29 March.
25.
Hale, Brenda
(2004b)
‘The Unique Perspective of Women Judges on the Law’
, The Independent, 16 November.
26.
Hale, Brenda
(2005)
‘Making a Difference? Why We Need a More Diverse Judiciary’
, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly56(32):
281-292
.
Hoggett, Brenda
(1976/2005) Mental Health Law.
London: Sweet & Maxwell
.
30.
Hoggett, Brenda
(1977/2005) Parents and Children.
London: Sweet & Maxwell
.
31.
Hoggett, Brenda
,
David Pearl
,
Elizabeth J. Cooke
and
Philip D. Bates
(1983/2002) The Family, Law and Society: Cases and
Materials.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
32.
Kaganas, Felicity
(2000)
‘Contact and Domestic Violence: The Winds of Change’
, Family Law Journal30:
630
.
33.
Kay, Herma H.
and
Geraldine Sparrow
(2001)
‘Workshop on Judging: Does Gender Make a Difference?’
, Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal16:
1-14
.
34.
Kenney, Sally J.
(2004)
‘Focus: Britain Appoints First Woman Law Lord’
, Judicature87:
189-190
.
35.
Lacey, Nicola
(1998) Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and
Social Theory.
Oxford: Hart
.
36.
Letts, Quentin
(2003)
‘She Smiled Disdainfully at Some Other Poor Wretch’
, Daily Mail, 19 November.
37.
Malleson, Kate
(2003)
‘Justifying Gender Equality on the Bench: Why Difference
Won’t Do’
, Feminist Legal Studies11:
1-24
.
38.
Mason, J. K.
(2002)
‘Wrongful Pregnancy, Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Terminology’
, Edinburgh Law Review6:
46-66
.
39.
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie
(1985)
‘Portia in a Different Voice: Speculations of a Women’s
Lawyering Process’
, Berkeley Women’s Law Journal1(1):
39-63
.
40.
Nedelsky, Jennifer
(1989)
‘Reconceiving Autonomy: Sources, Thoughts and Possibilities’
, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism1:
7-36
.
41.
O’Connor, Sandra. D.
(1991)
‘Portia’s Progress’
, New York University Law Review66:
1546-1558
.
42.
Pears, Christen
(2004)
‘The Trouble with Women in Wigs’
, The Northern Echo, 8 January.
43.
Phillips, Melanie
(2003)
‘I Deplore His Actions but Actually His Cause Is Just’
, Daily Mail, 5 November.
44.
Priaulx, Nicolette
(2004a)
‘Joy to the World! A (Healthy) Child Is Born! Reconceptualizing
“Harm” in Wrongful Conception’
, Social and Legal Studies13(1):
5-26
.
45.
Priaulx, Nicolette
(2004b)
‘That’s One Heck of An “Unruly
Horse”! Riding Roughshod over Autonomy in Wrongful Conception’
, Feminist Legal Studies12:
317-331
.
46.
Rackley, Erika
(2002)
‘Representations of the (Woman) Judge: Hercules, the Little
Mermaid and the Vain and Naked Emperor’
, Legal Studies22(4):
602-624
.
47.
Smith, Godfrey
(2004)
‘All Rise: Here Comes the Skirted Judge’
, Sunday Times, 11 January.
48.
Thornton, Margaret
(1996) Dissonance and Distrust: Women in the Legal
Profession.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
49.
Verkaik, Robert
(2003)
‘Hitting out: The Judge who Refused to be Retiring About Sexism
in her Lodgings’
, Independent, 18 September.
50.
Wilson, Bertha
(1990)
‘Will Women Judges Really Make a Difference?’
, Osgoode Hall Law Journal28:
507-522
.
