Discourse analysis,pragmatics and the dramatic ‘character: Tom Stoppard's Professional Foul

Abstract

Is there any way in which characters in dramatic texts may be considered a worthwhile object of criticism? The dearth of recent critical material in this area would suggest not, but the aim of this article is to demonstrate that the study of dramatic character may be effectively achieved by the application of theoretical principles derived from the linguistic analysis of conversation. The difficulties of accounting precisely for how readers of the play text get from the words on the page to judgements concerning the ‘personalities' of characters are overcome, to some extent, by the analysis of their conversational behaviour and using the powerful interpretative apparatus of discourse analysis and pragmatics to this end. As a focus for discussion, the character of Anderson, in Stoppard's play, Professional Foul, has been chosen, and a wide range of approaches taken from discourse analysis and pragmatics is used to identify in particular scenes the ways in which four prominent character traits are deducible from his conversational behaviour. The analysis begins with an examination of turn-length, turn-taking and topic-shift before applying pragmatic theories such as Grice's Cooperative Principle, Brown and Levinson's Politeness Phenomenon and Leech's Politeness Principle. In addition, this article addresses the problematic notion of character ‘development’ and argues that this may be accounted for in terms of a change in the conversational strategies used by a character, from which changes in attitude are inferable.

Keywords

character Co-operative Principle discourse analysis Politeness Phenomenon Politeness Principle pragmatics Professional Foul Stoppard Tom topic turn

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1978) Universal in language usage: politeness phenomena, in Goody, E. (ed.) Questions and Politeness Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 56–289

Downes, W. (1988) Discourse and drama: King Lear's ‘question’ to his daughters, in Van Peer, W. (ed.) (1988) The Taming of the Text: Explorations in Language, Literature and Culture, Routledge, London, pp. 225–57

Grice, H.P. (1975) Logic and conversation, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, London pp. 41–58

Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics, Longman, London

Leech, G. (1992) Pragmatic principles in Shaw's You Never Can Tell, in Toolan, M. (ed.) Language, Text and Context: Essays in Stylistics, Routledge, London, pp. 259–80

Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Schegloff, E. and Sacks, II. (1973) Opening up closings, Semiotica 8: 289–327

Searle, J. (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

10.

Short, M. (1989) Discourse analysis and the analysis of drama, in Carter, R. and Simpson, P. (eds.) Language, Discourse and Literature, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 139–63

11.

Simpson, P. (1989) Politeness Phenomena in Ionesco's The Lesson, in Carter, R. and Simpson, P. (eds.) Language, Discourse and Literature, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 171–87