Cognitive Grammar analyses the semantics of linguistic features in relation to human cognition; Free Indirect Style allows authors to represent their characters’ cognition with language. This article applies Cognitive Grammar to the analysis of a character’s mind that is represented with Free Indirect Style. In the tradition of mind style analysis, it aims to use linguistics to reveal some of the underlying cognitive processes and proclivities at work in the character’s psychology. The character in question is the protagonist in Malcolm Lowry’s Under the Volcano, an alcoholic who is largely characterised by his drunken behaviour and ideation. This article therefore focuses on the linguistic features that serve to represent his inebriated state of mind. It analyses the semantic effects of those features primarily in terms of attentional focus, drawing on Cognitive Grammar concepts, such as objective construal, specificity, scope, profile and domain, and relating these to the protagonist’s cognitive proclivities for solipsism, partial awareness, delayed reaction, attenuated experience and self-delusion. The article also discusses the theoretical background for mind style analysis, arguing for the continued importance of focusing on the relationship between the text and a character’s mind, alongside the focus on the reader’s mind that has come to dominate cognitive stylistics.
AdamsonS (1995) Empathetic narrative: A literary linguistic perspective. In: Ayres-BennetWO’DonovanP (eds) Syntax and the Literary System. Cambridge: Cambridge French Colloquia, pp. 17–42.
2.
AdamsonS (1998) Literary language. In: RomaineS (ed.) The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 589–692.
3.
BanfieldA (1981) Reflective and non-reflective consciousness in the language of fiction. Poetics Today2(2): 61–76.
4.
BanfieldA (1982) Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5.
BocktingI (1994) Mind-style as an interdisciplinary approach to characterisation. Language and Literature3(3): 157–174.
6.
BowlingL (1950) What is the stream of consciousness technique?PMLA50: 333–345.
7.
BradburyM (1973) Possibilities: Essays on the State of the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BrintonL (1980) Represented perception: A study in narrative style. Poetics Today9: 363–381.
9.
BrowseS (2018) From functional to cognitive grammar in Golding’s The Inheritors. Journal of Literary Semantics47(2): 121–146.
10.
ButlerJ (2017) Malcolm Lowry’s Under the Volcano and the drunken discourse of literary solipsism. University of Toronto Quarterly86(1): 37–66.
11.
ChatmanS (1978) Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
ClarkB (2009) Salient inferences: Pragmatics and The Inheritors. Language and Literature18(2): 173–212.
13.
CohnD (1978) Transparent Minds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
CohnD (1999) The Distinction of Fiction. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
15.
DabrowskaEDivjakD (eds) (2015) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
16.
EnkvistNE (1981) Experiential iconicism in text strategy. Text1(1): 77–111.
FalkD (1985) Self and shadow: The brothers Firmin in Under the Volcano. Texas Studies in Literature and Language27(2): 209–223.
19.
FillmoreC (1982) Frame semantics. In: Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, pp. 111–137.
20.
FludernikM (1993) The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge.
21.
FludernikM (1996) Towards a Natural Narratology. London: Routledge.
22.
FowlerR (1977) Linguistics and the Novel. Bungay: Methuen and Co.
23.
FowlerR (1996) Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
GiovanelliMHarrisonC (2018) Cognitive Grammar in Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury.
25.
HallidayMAK (1971) Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’sThe Inheritors. In: ChatmanS (ed.) Literary Style: A Symposium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 330–368.
26.
HallidayM (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edition. London: Hodder Education.
27.
HamburgerK (1973) The Logic of Literature. Indianapolis, IN: The Indiana University Press.
28.
HarrisonC (2014) Attentional windowing in David Foster Wallace’sThe Soul is not a Smithy. In: HarrisonCNuttallLStockwellPYuanW (eds) Cognitive Grammar in Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 53–67.
29.
HarrisonC (2017) Cognitive Grammar in Contemporary Fiction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30.
HarrisonCNuttallLStockwellPYuanW (eds) (2014) Cognitive Grammar in Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31.
HillA (1974) The alcoholic on alcoholism. Canadian Literature62: 33–48.
32.
HooverDL (1999) Language and Style in The Inheritors. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
33.
HooverDL (2016) Mind-style. In: SotirovaV (ed.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 325–340.
LangackerR (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
LangackerR (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume II Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
LangackerR (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
LangackerR (2013) Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
LawnJ (1993) Four characters in search of a narrator: Focalization and the representation of consciousness in Under the Volcano. Studies in Canadian Literature18(2). Available at: https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/SCL/article/view/8187 (accessed 12 July 2018).
LodgeD (2002) Consciousness and the Novel. London: Secker and Warburg.
42.
LowryM (1945 [2007]) Under the Volcano. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
43.
McIntyreD (2005) Logic, reality and mind style in Alan Bennett’s The Lady in the Van. Journal of Literary Semantics34(1): 21–40.
44.
McIntyreDArcherD (2010) A corpus-based approach to mind style. Journal of Literary Semantics39(2): 167–182.
45.
MooijerH (2013) Shared and direct experiential iconicity in digital reading games: Interactivity’s implications in Weir’s Silent Conversation. In: ElleströmLFischerOLjungbergC (eds) Iconic Investigations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 191–209.
46.
NuttallL (2014) Constructing a text world for The Handmaid’s Tale. In: HarrisonCNuttallLStockwellPYuanW (eds) Cognitive Grammar in Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 83–100.
47.
NuttallL (2015) Attributing minds to vampires in Richard Matheson’sI am Legend. Language and Literature26(2): 153–171.
48.
NuttallL (2018) Mind Style and Cognitive Grammar. London: Bloomsbury.
49.
RiquelmeJ (1983) Teller and Tale in Joyce’s Fiction: Oscillating Perspectives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
50.
RobinsonK (2018) Not altogether darkness: Drunkenness in Lowry’s Under the Volcano. The Explicator. Epub ahead of print 12 November 2018. DOI: 10.1080/00144940.2018.1453773.
51.
RundquistE (2014) How is Mrs Ramsay thinking? The semantic effects of consciousness presentation categories within free indirect style. Language and Literature23(2): 159–173.
52.
RundquistE (2016) Representations of consciousness in Woolf, Lawrence and Joyce: Modernist experimentations with the free indirect style. In: SotirovaV (ed.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 380–399.
53.
RundquistE (2017) Free Indirect Style in Modernism: Representations of Consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
54.
RundquistE (2019) Estilo y conciencia en Al faro de Virginia Woolf. ESLA17: 1–25.
55.
SchankRCAbelsonR (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56.
SeminoE (2002) A cognitive stylistic approach to mind style in narrative fiction. In: SeminoECulpeperJ (eds) Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 95–122.
57.
SeminoE (2006) Mind style. In: BrownK (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd edition. Boston, MA: Elsevier, pp. 142–148.
58.
SeminoE (2007) Mind style 25 years on. Style41(2): 153–203.
59.
SeminoE (2014) Pragmatic failure, mind style and characterisation in fiction about autism. Language and Literature23(2): 141–158.
60.
SeminoEShortM (2004) Corpus Stylistics. London: Routledge.
61.
SeminoESwindlehurstK (1996) Metaphor and mind style in Ken Kesey’sOne Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Style30(1): 143–166.
62.
SotirovaV (2004) Connectives in free indirect style: Continuity or shift?Language and Literature13: 216–234.
63.
SotirovaV (2011) D.H. Lawrence and Narrative Viewpoint. London: Continuum.
64.
SotirovaV (2013) Consciousness in Modernist Fiction: A Stylistic Study. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
StockwellP (2002) Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
66.
StockwellP (2009) Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
67.
StockwellP (2010) The eleventh checklist of the apocalypse. In: BusseBMcIntyreD (eds) Language and Style. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 419–32.
68.
StockwellPMahlbergM (2015) Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield. Language and Literature24(2): 129–147.
69.
TabakowskaE (1999) Linguistic expression of perceptual relationships: Iconicity as a principle of text organization (a case study). In: NännyMFischerO (eds) Form Miming Meaning [Iconicity in Language and Literature 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 409–422.
70.
ThompsonG (1996) Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
71.
TrotterD (1993) The English Novel in History. London: Routledge.
72.
VandelanotteL (2009) Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive Functional Analysis. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
73.
WoolfV (1919 [1984]) Modern fiction. In: McNeilleA (ed.) The Essays of Virginia Woolf, vol. 4. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp. 160–169.
74.
WrightS (1995) Subjectivity and experiential syntax. In: WrightSSteinD (eds) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–172.
