Among Evangelical Christians on the popular video-sharing site YouTube, the Bible is an important resource for justifying and challenging specific words and actions. Such justifications and challenges provide researchers with an opportunity to study how authoritative text is interpreted in social interaction. To that end, this article presents analysis of a single debate – an episode of what YouTube users call ‘drama’ – around one Evangelical Christian’s controversial use of a passage from the Bible to justify calling others ‘human garbage’. This analysis shows first, that conflicting interpretations and use of the Bible’s moral authority led to the development of ‘drama’ because users evidenced differing beliefs about the development of biblical metaphorical language; and second, that users appropriated the Bible’s words to their own discourse activity through exegesis and metaphor development. This article thus provides both an empirical case study in the interpretation of figurative language and a challenge to the common assumption that Evangelical Christians are committed to a ‘literal’ interpretation of the Bible.
AllingtonD (2006) First steps towards a rhetorical psychology of literary interpretation. Journal of Literary Semantics35(2): 123–144.
2.
AllingtonD (2007) ‘How come most people don’t see it?’: Slashing theLord of the Rings. Social Semiotics17(1): 43–62.
3.
AllingtonD (2012) Private experience, textual analysis and institutional authority: The discursive practice of critical interpretation and its enactment in literary training. Language and Literature21(2): 211–225.
4.
amy2x (2011) Ex-Gay Testimony-Now a True Christian-Great Testimony from Former Lesbian. YouTube, 20September. Available at: http://youtu.be/aEzSoGroPxA (accessed 15 August 2012).
ArmstrongK (2007) The Bible: A Biography. London: Atlantic Books.
7.
BartkowskiJ (1996) Beyond biblical literalism and inerrancy: Conservative Protestants and the hermeneutic interpretation of scripture. Sociology of Religion57(3): 259–272.
8.
BebbingtonDWBebbingtonD (1989) Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s. London: Routledge.
9.
BilligM (1996) Arguing and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BoeveLFeyaertsK (1999) Metaphor and God-talk. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
11.
BooneKC (1989) The Bible Tells Them So: The Discourse of Protestant Fundamentalism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
CameronL (2008) Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In: ZanottoMSCameronLCavalcantiMC (eds) Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 45–62.
13.
CameronL (2010a) The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In: CameronLMaslenR (eds) Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. London: Equinox, 77–96.
14.
CameronL (2010b) Metaphor and Reconciliation: The Discourse Dynamics of Empathy in Post-Conflict Conversations. London: Routledge.
15.
CameronLMaslenR (2010) Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. London: Equinox.
16.
CameronLMaslenRToddZ. (2009) The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol24(2): 63–89.
17.
Charteris-BlackJ (2004) Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
Charteris-BlackJ (2005) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
CortsDPMeyersK (2002) Conceptual clusters in figurative language production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research31(4): 391–408.
20.
FishS (1982) Working on the chain gang: Interpretation in the law and in literary criticism. Critical Inquiry9(1): 201–216.
21.
ForresterD (1981) Biblical interpretation and cultural relativism. In: WadsworthM (ed.) Ways of Reading the Bible. Brighton: The Harvester Press Limited, 118–130.
22.
FoucaultM (1981) The orders of discourse. In: YoungR (ed.) Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. London: Routledge, 48–78.
23.
FoucaultM (1982) The subject and power. Critical Inquiry8(4): 777–795.
24.
GibbsR (1994) The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
GoatlyA (2007) Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amersterdam: John Benjamins.
26.
GravesMP (1983) Functions of key metaphors in early Quaker sermons, 1671–1700. Quarterly Journal of Speech69(4): 364–378.
27.
KopytkoR (1995) Against rationalistic pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics23(5): 475–491.
28.
LamarqueP (1987) Metaphor and religious language. Philosophical Books28(1): 59–61.
29.
LangA (2010) ‘The status is not quo!’: Pursuing resolution in web-disseminated serial narrative. Narrative18(3): 367–381.
30.
Larsen-FreemanDCameronL (2008) Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
MaillouxS (1989) Rhetorical Power. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
32.
MalleyB (2004) How the Bible Works: An Anthropological Study of Evangelical Biblicalism. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
33.
NoakesS (1992) Gracious words: Luke’s Jesus and the reading of sacred poetry. In: BoyarinJ (ed.) The Ethnography of Reading. Oxford: University of California Press, 38–57.
34.
NollMA (2001) American Evangelical Christianity: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
35.
NuttallGF (1992) The Holy Spirit in Puritan Faith and Experience. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36.
PackerJI (1978) The Evangelical Anglican Identity Problem: An Analysis. Oxford: Latimer.
37.
PeplowD (2011) ‘Oh, I’ve known a lot of Irish people’: Reading groups and the negotiation of literary interpretation. Language and Literature20(4): 295–315.
PihlajaS (2011b) ‘Are you religious or are you saved?’: Investigating membership categorisation in religious discussions on YouTube. Fieldwork in Religion6(1): 27–46.
40.
SoskiceJM (2007) The Kindness of God: Metaphor, Gender, and Religious Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
Southern Baptist Convention (n.d.) The Baptist faith and message. Southern Baptist Convention Statement of Faith. Available at: http://www.sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp#i (accessed 13 October 2010).
42.
SperberDWilsonD (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. London: Blackwell Publishers.
43.
SteenG (2007) Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage: A Methodological Analysis of Theory and Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44.
SwannJAllingtonD (2009) Reading groups and the language of literary texts: A case study in social reading. Language and Literature18(3): 247–264.
45.
TayD (2011) therapy is a journey as a discourse metaphor. Discourse Studies13(1): 445–463.
46.
WhiteleyS (2011) Text World Theory, real readers and emotional responses toThe Remains of the Day. Language and Literature20(1): 23–42.
47.
ZanottoMSCameronLCavalcantiMC (2008) Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
