This article reports on an analysis of stance-taking in the university classroom, examining how students position themselves in relation to academic knowledge through the epistemic phrases I don’t know and I think. Analysis of specific interactional moments reveals that the meaning of discourse forms is largely indeterminate without an understanding of (1) the immediate discourse context; (2) the place of linguistic forms in an individual’s stylistic repertoire; and (3) the ideologies and social categories that frame that stylistic repertoire. Differential knowledge distribution amongst the students places constraints on what certain individuals can do with particular linguistic forms and this analysis reveals how they utilize the same linguistic resources in different ways in order to do different identity work. Through detailed interactional analysis, I demonstrate that our ability to evaluate classroom discussion as a social practice relies upon our ability to situate that practice within an understanding of individual speakers’ personal styles and the social ideologies that frame them.
Aijmer K. ( 1997) I think - an English modal particle. In: Swan T, Westvik OJ (eds) Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1-47.
2.
Allington D. and Swann J. ( 2009) Researching literary reading as social practice. Language and Literature18(3): 219-230.
3.
Ariel M. ( 2009) Discourse, grammar, discourse. Discourse Studies11(1): 5-36.
4.
Barth-Weingarten D, Reber E and Selting M (eds) ( 2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5.
Benwell B. ( 1999) The collaborative construction of knowledge: Issues, rhetorical and pedagogic discourse strategies in multidisciplinary tutorial discourse . Pragmatics9(4): 535-565.
6.
Benwell B. and Stokoe E. ( 2002) Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: Shifting dynamics and identities. Discourse Studies4(4): 429-453.
7.
Bourdieu P. ( 1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
8.
Bucholtz M. and Hall K. ( 2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistics approach. Discourse Studies7(4-5): 585-614.
9.
Clift R. ( 2006) Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential . Journal of Sociolinguistics10(5): 569-595.
10.
Couper-Kuhlen E and Ford C (eds) (2004) Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic Studies from Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11.
Couper-Kuhlen E and Selting M (eds) (1996) Prosody in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Coupland N. ( 2007) Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Davies B. and Harré R. ( 1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour20(1): 43-63.
14.
Du Bois J. ( 2002) Stance and consequence. Paper presented at the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association , New Orleans, USA, 20-24 November 2002 .
15.
Eckert P. ( 2001) Style and social meaning. In: Eckert P and Rickford, JR (eds) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 119-126.
16.
Eckert P. ( 2008) Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics12(4): 453-476.
17.
Eriksson Barajas K. and Aronsson K. ( 2009) Avid versus struggling readers: Co-construed pupil identities in school booktalk. Language and Literature18(3): 281-299.
18.
Fung L. and Carter R. ( 2007) Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics28(3): 410-439.
19.
Gavins J. ( 2007) Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
20.
Goodwin C. and Heritage J. ( 1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology19: 283-307.
21.
Hade D. ( 1991) Being literary in a literature-based classroom. Children’s Literature in Education22(1): 1-17.
22.
Haegeman P. ( 1996) Business English in Flanders: A study of Lingua Franca telephone interaction. PhD thesis, University of Ghent .
23.
Hall G. ( 2008) Empirical research into the processing of free indirect discourse and the imperative of ecological validity. In: Zyngier S, Bortolussi M, Chesnokova A and Auracher J (eds) Directions in Empirical Literary Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 21-34.
24.
Hall G. ( 2009) Texts, readers - and real readers. Language and Literature18(3): 331-337.
25.
Heritage J. ( 1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge : Polity Press.
26.
Holmes J. ( 1990) Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech . Language and Communication10(3): 185-205.
27.
James S. ([ 2005] 1994) Hoop Dreams (DVD). USA: The Criterion Collection.
28.
Jeffries L. ( 2008) The role of style in reader-involvement: Deictic shifting in contemporary poems. Journal of Literary Semantics37(1): 69-85.
29.
Johnstone B. ( 2009) Stance, style, and the linguistic individual. In: Jaffe A (ed.) Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29-52.
30.
Kärkkäinen E. ( 2003) Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of its Interactional Functions with a Focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31.
Kiesling S. ( 2001) Stances of whiteness and hegemony in fraternity men’s discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology11(1): 101-115.
32.
Kiesling S. ( 2009) Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. In: Jaffe A (ed.) Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 171-194.
33.
Kirkham S. ( 2009) Style and discourse variation: A sociolinguistic analysis of university classroom talk. MA thesis, University of Sheffield.
34.
Kockelman P. ( 2004) Stance and subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology14(2): 127-150.
35.
Lavandera BR ( 1978) Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society7(2): 171-182.
36.
Local J. and Walker G. ( 2008) Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources. Text & Talk28(6): 723-747.
37.
Longman J. ( 2001) The Girls of Summer: The U.S. Women’s Soccer Team and How It Changed The World. New York: HarperCollins.
38.
McDonagh E. and Pappano L. ( 2008) Playing With The Boys: Why Separate is Not Equal in Sports . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
39.
Messner MA ( 2007) Out of Play: Critical Essays on Gender and Sport. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
40.
Messner MA and Sabo DF (eds) (1990) Sport, Men and the Gender Order: Critical Feminist Perspectives. Champaign: Human Kinetics Books.
41.
Moerman M. ( 1988) Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis . Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
42.
Moore E. and Podesva RJ ( 2009) Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions . Language in Society38(4): 447-485.
43.
Mondada L. ( 2007) Multimodal resources for turn-taking: pointing and the emergence of next possible speakers. Discourse Studies9(2): 194-225.
44.
Overstreet M. and Yule G. ( 2001) Formulaic disclaimers. Journal of Pragmatics33(1): 45-60.
45.
Pichler H. ( 2007) Form-function relations in discourse: the case of I DON’T KNOW. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics13: 174-187.
46.
Pichler H. ( 2008) A qualitative-quantitative analysis of negative auxiliaries in a northern English dialect: I DON’T KNOW and I DON’T THINK, innit? PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen.
47.
Rodman D. ( 1997) Bad as I Wanna Be. New York: Dell Publishing.
48.
Sacks H., Schegloff EA and Jefferson G. ( 1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language50(4): 696-735.
49.
Schegloff EA ( 1993) Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation . Research on Language and Social Interaction26: 99-128.
50.
Scraton S., Fasting K., Pfister G. and Bunuel A. ( 1999) It’s still a man’s game? The experiences of top-level European women footballers. International Review for the Sociology of Sport34(2): 99-111.
51.
Selting M. ( 2000) The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society29(4): 477-517.
52.
Stokoe E. ( 1995) Gender differences in undergraduates’ talk: Contrasting analyses, and what they offer. Feminism & Psychology5(1): 99-104.
53.
Stokoe E. ( 1998) Talking about gender: The conversational construction of gender categories in academic discourse. Discourse & Society9(2): 217-240.
54.
Stokoe E. ( 2000) Constructing topicality in university students’ small-group discussion: A conversation analytic approach. Language and Education14(3): 184-203.
55.
Swann J. and Allington D. ( 2009) Reading groups and the language of literary texts: A case study in social reading. Language and Literature18(3): 247-264.
56.
Wales K. ( 1996) Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Wilkinson S. and Kitzinger C. ( 2008) Using conversation analysis in feminist and critical research . Social and Personality Psychology Compass2(2): 555-573.
58.
Wortham S. ( 2008) The objectification of identity across events. Linguistics and Education19(3): 294-311.
