Review Article: A modest proposal for a reorientation in literary studies

Abstract

This essay offers a review of Literature, Science and a New Humanities by Jonathan Gottschall. The author challenges the field of literary studies to rethink long-held assumptions about the nature of knowledge and human nature. In particular, what appear to be dominant tendencies in the field have strongly resisted the inclusion of findings from biology and genetics specifically. This resistance is tied to a view that scientific methods do not apply to the study of literature, and that radical social-constructivist theory presents a general alternative to the traditional methods of scientific inquiry. A proposal is made to incorporate recent advances in the cognitive sciences into the analysis of literature. Specifically, concepts drawn from evolutionary psychology might be especially useful in the analysis of narrative themes.

Keywords

cognitive semantics cross-cultural universals evolutionary psychology narrative social constructivism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bloom, P. and Keil, F. ( 2001) ‘Thinking through language’, Mind and Language 16(4): 351-67.

Burling, R. ( 2005) The Talking Ape: How Language Evolved. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fitch, W.T. ; Hauser, M. and Chomsky, N. ( 2005) ‘The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications’, Cognition 97(2): 179-210.

Francis, N. ( 2006) ‘La ruta de Alejo Carpentier: Teoría de los orígenes de la música y los géneros estéticos’ , Tamkang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 28: 123-62.

Francis, N. ( 2008) ‘Verbal art and linguistic science: A second approximation’ , California Linguistic Notes 33(2), URL (accessed 10 March 2010 ): http://hss.fullerton.edu/linguistics/cln/Spring-08.htm

González, N. ( 2005) ‘Children in the Eye of the Storm: Language Socialization and Language Ideologies in a Dual-language School’, in A.C. Zentella (ed.) Building on Strength: Language and Literacy in Latino Families and Communities, pp. 162-74. New York: Teachers College Press.

Gottschall, J. ( 2008) Literature, Science, and a New Humanities. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jackendoff, R. ( 2006) ‘On conceptual semantics’, Intercultural Pragmatics 3(3): 353-8.

Jackendoff, R. ( 2007) Language, Consciousness, Culture: Essays on Mental Structure . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

10.

Mercado, C. ( 2005) ‘Seeing what’s there: Language and literacy funds of knowledge in New York Puerto Rican homes’, in A.C. Zentella (ed.) Building on Strength: Language and Literacy in Latino Families and Communities, pp. 134-47. New York: Teachers College Press.

11.

Navarrete Gómez: R. ( 2009) Cuentos Náhuatl de la Malintzin. San Miguel Canoa, Puebla: Seminario de Estudios Modernos y de Cultura Acal-lan, see URL (accessed 10 March 2010): http://www.4.nau.edu/seminario/

12.

Newmeyer, F. ( 2003) ‘What can the field of linguistics tell us about the origins of language?’ in M. Christiansen & S. Kirby (eds) Language Evolution, pp. 58-76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13.

Pinker, S. ( 2004) ‘Why nature and nurture won’t go away’ , Daedalus 133(4): 5-17.

14.

Pinker, S. ( 2007) The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. New York: Viking.

15.

Slezak : (2000) ‘A critique of radical social constructivism’, in D.C. Philips (ed.) Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues: Ninety-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1, pp. 91-126. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Sokol, A. ( 2008) Beyond the Hoax: Science, Philosophy and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

17.

Zentella, A.C. ( 2005) Building on Strength: Language and Literacy in Latino Families and Communities. New York: Teachers College Press.