The present study examines sociolinguistic features of a particular speech act, paying compliments, by comparing and contrasting native Chinese and native American speakers' performances. By focusing on a relatively understudied speaker group such as the Chinese, typically regarded as having rules of speaking and social norms very different from those of Westerners, this paper aims at illuminating the fact that, in cross-cultural communication, foreign language speakers have to pay close attention to sociolinguistic rules of the target language in addition to structure and discourse rules to meet the needs of linguistic accuracy and fluency. This is due to the fact that such rules play an indispensable role in appropriating the proper use of linguistic forms. The data for this study were collected using ethnographic observation pioneered in this field by Wolfson and Manes (1980). The analysis will first explore both the features of distribution of paying compliments, and the functions they may serve in spoken exchanges for native Chinese and American English speakers. To present a fuller picture of the socio-cultural features this speech act may represent in Chinese and American societies, the analysis will further focus on the issues of topics, the addresser-addressee relationship, and culture-specificity versus universality.
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words (edited by J. O. Urmson and M. Sbisà). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Bach, K., & Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1989). Playing it safe: The role of conventionality in indirectness. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 37-70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. , & Kasper, G. (Eds.). ( 1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.D. (1978). "Universals of language usage: Politeness phenomena." In: E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56-234). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
6.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.D. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales . Educational Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
8.
Cole, P., & Morgan, J. (Eds.). (1975). Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts. New York, Academic Press.
9.
Fishman, J.A. (1965). Yiddish in America. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
10.
Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1989). Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 221-247). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11.
Fraser, B. (1985). On the universality of speech act strategies. In S. George (Ed.), From the linguistic to the social context (pp. 43 -49). Bologna, Italy: CLUEB.
12.
Fraser, B., Rintell, E., & Walters, J. (1980). An approach to conducting research on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp.75-91). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
13.
Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics , 24(1), 90-121.
14.
Green, G. (1975). How to get people to do things with words. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 107-142). New York: Academic Press.
15.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp.41-58). New York: Academic Press.
16.
Herbert, R.K. (1989). The ethnography of English compliments and compliment responses: A contrastive sketch. In W. Oleksy (Ed.), Contrastive pragmatics (pp. 3-35). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
17.
Herbert, R.K. (1990). Sex-based differences in compliment behavior. Language in Society, 19,201-224.
18.
Herbert, R.K., & Straight, H.S. (1989). Compliment-rejection versus compliment-avoidance: Listener-based versus speaker-based pragmatic strategies . Language and Communication, 9, 35-47.
19.
Holmes, J. (1986). Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics, 28, 485-508.
20.
Holmes, J. (1988). Paying compliments: A sex-preferential politeness strategies. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 445-465.
21.
Holmes, J. (1989). Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10, 194-213.
22.
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men, and politeness. London: Longman.
23.
Hsu, F.L. (1953). American and Chinese. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai`i Press.
24.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundation in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25.
Kasper, G. (2000). Data collection in pragmatics research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 316-41). London and New York: Continuum.
26.
Kirkpatrick, A. (1991). Information sequencing in Mandarin in letters of request. Anthropological Linguistics, 33(2), 183-203.
27.
Knapp, M., Hopper, R., & Bell, R. (1984). Compliments: A descriptive taxonomy. Journal of Communication, 34, 12-31.
28.
Labov, W. (1984). Field methods of project on linguistic change and variation. In J. Baugh & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics (pp. 28-53). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29.
LeCompte, M., & Goertz, J. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31-60.
30.
Lee, C. ( 1990). Cute yaw haiya-nah! Hawaii Creole English compliments and their responses: Implications for cross-cultural pragmatic failure. University of Hawaii Working Paper in ESL, 9, 115-161.
31.
Leech, G.N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman.
32.
Lehrer, A. (1989). Remembering and representing prose: Quoted speech as a data source. Discourse Processes, 12, 105-125.
33.
Levinson, S.C. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interactions in institutional settings (pp. 265-399). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (1989). Praising and complimenting. In W. Oleksy (Ed.), Contrastive pragmatics (pp.73-100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35.
Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36.
Manes, J. (1983). Compliments: A mirror of cultural values. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp.96-102). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
37.
Manes, J., & Wolfson, N. (1981). The compliment formula. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine (pp. 115-132). Hague: Mouton.
38.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Oliver, R.T. (1971). Communication and culture in ancient India and China. New York: Syracuse University Press.
40.
Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the cooperation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp.79-112). New York: Academic Press.
41.
Scollon, R., & Wong-Scollon, S. (1991). Topic confusion in English-Asian discourse. World Englishes, 9, 113-123.
42.
Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Searle, J.R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 59-82). New York: Academic Press.
44.
Searle, J.R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Watson-Gegeo, K.A. (1988). Ethnography in ESL: Defining the essentials. TESOL Quarterly, 22,575-592.
46.
Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .
47.
Wolfson, N. (1983). An empirically based analysis of complimenting in American English. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 82-95). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
48.
Wolfson, N. (1984). "Pretty is as pretty does": A speech act view of sex roles. Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 236-244.
49.
Wolfson, N. (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. New York: Newbury House.
50.
Wolfson, N., & Manes, J. (1980). The compliment as a social strategy. Paper in Linguistics, 13(3), 391-410.
51.
Yang, S. (1987). A comparison between Chinese and American cultures in forms of address, greetings, farewells, and compliments. Cross Currents, 13, 13-28.
52.
Ye, L. ( 1995). Complimenting in Mandarin Chinese. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language (pp.207-295). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
53.
Yu, M. ( 1999a). Cross-cultural and interlanguage pragmatics: Developing communicative competence in a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Harvard University, Cambridge .
54.
Yu, M. ( 1999b). Universalistic and culture-specific perspectives on variation in the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language . Pragmatics, 9(2), 281-312.
55.
Yu, M. ( 2003). On universality of face: Evidence from Chinese compliment response behavior. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1679-1710.
56.
Yuan, Y. (2001). An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data-gathering methods: Written DCTS, oral DCTs, field notes, and natural conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 271 -292.
57.
Zhang, Y. (1995). Indirectness in Chinese requesting. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language (pp. 69-118). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
