The Impacts of Anxiety and Motivation on Spatial Performance: Implications for Gender Differences in Mental Rotation and Navigation

Abstract

Despite extensive research on gender differences in spatial cognition, the potential roles of affective and situational factors in accounting for these differences remain relatively understudied. Here, we discuss the impacts of spatial anxiety and motivation in mental rotation and navigation tasks, particularly their roles in explaining the gender performance gaps. We highlight the distinction between approach and avoidance motivation, as well as interactions between anxiety and motivation. Attention, working memory, and response strategy are discussed as mechanisms by which anxiety and motivation may affect performance on spatial tasks. Implications for a broader approach that also considers other psychological variables, such as confidence, are discussed.

Keywords

spatial reasoning gender differences affect anxiety motivation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez-Vargas

Abad

Pruden

S. M.

(2020). Spatial anxiety mediates the sex difference in adult mental rotation test performance. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, Article 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00231-8

Beilock

S. L.

Carr

T. H.

(2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 701–725. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.701

Bian

Leslie

S.-J.

Cimpian

(2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524

Blascovich

(2008). Challenge and threat. In Elliot

A. J.

(Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 431–445). Psychology Press.

Bless

Fiedler

(2006). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. In Forgas

J. P.

(Ed.), Affect in social thinking and behavior (pp. 65–84). Psychology Press.

Boone

A. P.

Hegarty

(2017). Sex differences in mental rotation tasks: Not just in the mental rotation process! Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000370

Burte

Turner

B. O.

Miller

M. B.

Hegarty

(2018). The neural basis of individual differences in directional sense. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, Article 410. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00410

Calcott

R. D.

Berkman

E. T.

(2014). Attentional flexibility during approach and avoidance motivational states: The role of context in shifts of attentional breadth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1393–1408. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035060

Cheng

Shettleworth

S. J.

Huttenlocher

Rieser

J. J.

(2007). Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.625

10.

Christie

G. J.

Cook

C. M.

Ward

B. J.

Tata

M. S.

Sutherland

R. J.

Saucier

D. M.

(2013). Mental rotational ability is correlated with spatial but not verbal working memory performance and P300 amplitude in males. PLOS ONE, 8(2), Article e57390. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057390

11.

Coluccia

Louse

(2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.08.006

12.

Cona

Scarpazza

(2019). Where is the “where” in the brain? A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on spatial cognition. Human Brain Mapping, 40(6), 1867–1886. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24496

13.

Crowe

Higgins

E. T.

(1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675

14.

Crowell

Kelley

N. J.

Schmeichel

B. J.

(2014). Trait approach motivation moderates the aftereffects of self-control. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01112

15.

Elliot

A. J.

(Ed.). (2008). Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203888148

16.

Engle

R. W.

(2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160

17.

Estes

Felker

(2012). Confidence mediates the sex difference in mental rotation performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(3), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9875-5

18.

Eysenck

M. W.

Derakshan

Santos

Calvo

M. G.

(2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336

19.

Friedman

R. S.

Förster

(2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001

20.

Geiser

Lehmann

Eid

(2006). Separating “rotators” from “nonrotators” in the mental rotations test: A multigroup latent class analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(3), 261–293. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_2

21.

Hester

Garavan

(2005). Working memory and executive function: The influence of content and load on the control of attention. Memory & Cognition, 33(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195311

22.

Hubbard

E. M.

Piazza

Pinel

Dehaene

(2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1684

23.

Hund

A. M.

Nazarczuk

S. N.

(2009). The effects of sense of direction and training experience on wayfinding efficiency. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.009

24.

Jansen

Kaltner

Memmert

(2017). Approaching behavior reduces gender differences in the mental rotation performance. Psychological Research, 81(6), 1192–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0817-7

25.

Jones

Meijen

McCarthy

P. J.

Sheffield

(2009). A theory of challenge and threat states in athletes. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2, 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840902829331

26.

Kaufman

S. B.

(2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.009

27.

Kelley

N. J.

Hortensius

Schutter

D. J. L. G.

Harmon-Jones

(2017). The relationship of approach/avoidance motivation and asymmetric frontal cortical activity: A review of studies manipulating frontal asymmetry. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 119, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.03.001

28.

Koch

Holland

R. W.

van Knippenberg

(2008). Regulating cognitive control through approach-avoidance motor actions. Cognition, 109(1), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.014

29.

Lauer

J. E.

Esposito

A. G.

Bauer

P. J.

(2018). Domain-specific anxiety relates to children’s math and spatial performance. Developmental Psychology, 54(11), 2126–2138. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000605

30.

Lauer

J. E.

Yhang

Lourenco

S. F.

(2019). The development of gender differences in spatial reasoning: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 145(6), 537–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000191

31.

Lawton

C. A.

Kallai

(2002). Gender differences in wayfinding strategies and anxiety about wayfinding: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 47(9), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021668724970

32.

Lemieux

C. L.

Collin

C. A.

Watier

N. N.

(2019). Gender differences in metacognitive judgments and performance on a goal-directed wayfinding task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1625905

33.

Lerner

J. S.

Valdesolo

Kassam

K. S.

(2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043

34.

Levin

S. L.

Mohamed

F. B.

Platek

S. M.

(2005). Common ground for spatial cognition? A behavioral and fMRI study of sex differences in mental rotation and spatial working memory. Evolutionary Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490500300116

35.

Levine

S. C.

Foley

Lourenco

Ehrlich

Ratliff

(2016). Sex differences in spatial cognition: Advancing the conversation. WIREs Cognitive Science, 7(2), 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1380

36.

Liu

Lourenco

(2022). Affective factors affect visuospatial decision-making: A drift diffusion modeling approach. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 44(44), 715–721. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9kd457qg

37.

Lourenco

S. F.

Addy

Huttenlocher

Fabian

(2011). Early sex differences in weighting geometric cues: Sex differences and geometry. Developmental Science, 14(6), 1365–1378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01086.x

38.

Lourenco

S. F.

Cheung

C.-N.

Aulet

L. S.

(2018). Is visuospatial reasoning related to early mathematical development? A critical review. In Henik

Fias

(Eds.), Heterogeneity of function in numerical cognition (pp. 177–210). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811529-9.00010-8

39.

Lyons

I. M.

Ramirez

Maloney

E. A.

Rendina

D. N.

Levine

S. C.

Beilock

S. L.

(2018). Spatial anxiety: A novel questionnaire with subscales for measuring three aspects of spatial anxiety. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4(3), 526–553. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v4i3.154

40.

Maddox

W. T.

Markman

A. B.

(2010). The motivation-cognition interface in learning and decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(2), 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410364008

41.

Malanchini

Rimfeld

Shakeshaft

N. G.

Rodic

Schofield

Selzam

Dale

P. S.

Petrill

S. A.

Kovas

(2017). The genetic and environmental aetiology of spatial, mathematics and general anxiety. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 42218. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42218

42.

Maloney

E. A.

Sattizahn

J. R.

Beilock

S. L.

(2014). Anxiety and cognition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 5(4), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1299

43.

Moè

(2016). Teaching motivation and strategies to improve mental rotation abilities. Intelligence, 59, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.10.004

44.

Moè

(2021). Doubling mental rotation scores in high school students: Effects of motivational and strategic trainings. Learning and Instruction, 74, Article 101461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101461

45.

Moè

Meneghetti

Cadinu

(2009). Women and mental rotation: Incremental theory and spatial strategy use enhance performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 187–191.

46.

Moè

Pazzaglia

(2010). Beyond genetics in mental rotation test performance: The power of effort attribution. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 464–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.03.004

47.

Moran

T. P.

(2016). Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 831–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000051

48.

Murty

V. P.

LaBar

K. S.

Hamilton

D. A.

Adcock

R. A.

(2011). Is all motivation good for learning? Dissociable influences of approach and avoidance motivation in declarative memory. Learning & Memory, 18(11), 712–717. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.023549.111

49.

Nazareth

Huang

Voyer

Newcombe

(2019). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human navigation skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1503–1528. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01633-6

50.

Newcombe

N. S.

(2020). The puzzle of spatial sex differences: Current status and prerequisites to solutions. Child Development Perspectives, 14(4), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12389

51.

Nieuwenhuys

Oudejans

R. R. D.

(2012). Anxiety and perceptual-motor performance: Toward an integrated model of concepts, mechanisms, and processes. Psychological Research, 76(6), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0384-x

52.

Okanda

Meng

Kanakogi

Uragami

Yamamoto

Moriguchi

(2022). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability in Japanese children. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 16748. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20815-2

53.

Phelps

E. A.

Ling

Carrasco

(2006). Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychological Science, 17(4), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01701.x

54.

Rahe

Jansen

(2022). Sex differences in mental rotation: The role of stereotyped material, perceived performance and extrinsic spatial ability. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 34(3), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2021.2011896

55.

Rahe

Quaiser-Pohl

(2020). Am I right? The effects of feedback on the performance in a mental-rotation test in children. British Journal of Education, 8(4), 95–102.

56.

Rahe

Ruthsatz

Jansen

Quaiser-Pohl

(2019). Different practice effects for males and females by psychometric and chronometric mental-rotation tests. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2018.1561702

57.

Ramirez

Gunderson

E. A.

Levine

S. C.

Beilock

S. L.

(2012). Spatial anxiety relates to spatial abilities as a function of working memory in children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.616214

58.

Roskes

De Dreu

C. K. W.

Nijstad

B. A.

(2012). Necessity is the mother of invention: Avoidance motivation stimulates creativity through cognitive effort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028442

59.

Roskes

Elliot

A. J.

De Dreu

C. K. W.

(2014). Why is avoidance motivation problematic, and what can be done about it? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414524224

60.

Schmader

Forbes

C. E.

Zhang

Mendes

W. B.

(2009). A metacognitive perspective on the cognitive deficits experienced in intellectually threatening environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(5), 584–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208330450

61.

Schmader

Johns

Forbes

(2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336

62.

Schmitz

(1999). Gender differences in acquisition of environmental knowledge related to wayfinding behavior, spatial anxiety and self-estimated environmental competencies. Sex Roles, 41(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018837808724

63.

Scholer

A. A.

Higgins

E. T.

(2008). Distinguishing levels of approach and avoidance: An exploration using regulatory focus theory. In Elliot

A. J.

(Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 489–503). Psychology Press.

64.

Schwabe

Oitzl

M. S.

Philippsen

Richter

Bohringer

Wippich

Schachinger

(2007). Stress modulates the use of spatial versus stimulus-response learning strategies in humans. Learning & Memory, 14(1–2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.435807

65.

Seibt

Förster

(2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.38

66.

Shackman

A. J.

Sarinopoulos

Maxwell

J. S.

Pizzagalli

D. A.

Lavric

Davidson

R. J.

(2006). Anxiety selectively disrupts visuospatial working memory. Emotion, 6(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.40

67.

Shepard

R. N.

Metzler

(1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703.

68.

Sholl

M. J.

Kenny

R. J.

Della Porta

K. A.

(2006). Allocentric-heading recall and its relation to self-reported sense-of-direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(3), 516–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.516

69.

Uttal

D. H.

Meadow

N. G.

Tipton

Hand

L. L.

Alden

A. R.

Warren

Newcombe

N. S.

(2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446

70.

Vander Heyden

K. M.

van Atteveldt

N. M.

Huizinga

Jolles

. (2016). Implicit and explicit gender beliefs in spatial ability: Stronger stereotyping in boys than girls. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01114

71.

Vine

S. J.

Moore

L. J.

Wilson

M. R.

(2016). An integrative framework of stress, attention, and visuomotor performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01671

72.

Vine

S. J.

Uiga

Lavric

Moore

L. J.

Tsaneva-Atanasova

Wilson

M. R.

(2015). Individual reactions to stress predict performance during a critical aviation incident. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28(4), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2014.986722

73.

Wang

Carr

(2014). Working memory and strategy use contribute to gender differences in spatial ability. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.960568

74.

Wang

Lukowski

S. L.

Hart

S. A.

Lyons

I. M.

Thompson

L. A.

Kovas

Mazzocco

M. M. M.

Plomin

Petrill

S. A.

(2015). Is math anxiety always bad for math learning? The role of math motivation. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1863–1876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615602471

75.

Wolbers

Hegarty

(2010). What determines our navigational abilities? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001

76.

Zacks

J. M.

(2008). Neuroimaging studies of mental rotation: A meta-analysis and review. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20013

77.

Zander

Montag

Wetzel

Bertel

(2020). A gender issue? How touch-based interactions with dynamic spatial objects support performance and motivation of secondary school students. Computers & Education, 143, Article 103677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103677