Research over the last 5 decades has suggested that negative affective states narrow cognitive scope, whereas positive affective states broaden cognitive scope. An examination of this past research, however, reveals that only negative affects of high motivational intensity (e.g., fear, stress) and positive affects of low motivational intensity (e.g., gratitude, amusement) may have been examined. Consequently, over the last 5 years, research has examined positive and negative affects that are low (e.g., sadness) versus high (e.g., desire) in motivational intensity. This research has found that affects of low motivational intensity broaden cognitive scope whereas affects of high motivational intensity narrow cognitive scope, regardless of the positivity or negativity of the affective state.
BerridgeK. C. (2007). The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: The case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology, 191, 391–431. doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0578-x
2.
CarverC. S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition & Emotion, 17, 241–261. doi:10.1080/02699930302294
3.
EasterbrookJ. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201. doi:10.1037/h0047707
4.
FinucaneA. M. (2011). The effect of fear and anger on selective attention. Emotion, 11, 970–974. doi:10.1037/a0022574
5.
FotiD.HajcakD.DienJ. (2009). Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: Evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. Psychophysiology, 46, 521–530. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00796.x
6.
FoxE. (2008). Emotion science: Cognitive and neuroscientific approaches to understanding human emotions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden and build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
8.
FredricksonB. L.BraniganC. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 313–332. doi:10.1080/ 02699930441000238
GableP. A.Harmon-JonesE. (2010a). The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows: Attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity. Psychological Science, 21, 211–215. doi:10.1177/0956797609359622
11.
GableP. A.Harmon-JonesE. (2010b). The effect of low vs. high approach-motivated positive affect on memory for peripherally vs. centrally presented information. Emotion, 10, 599–603. doi:10.1037/a0018426
12.
GableP. A.Harmon-JonesE. (2010c). Late positive potential to appetitive stimuli and local attentional bias. Emotion, 10, 441–446. doi:10.1037/a0018425
13.
GableP. A.Harmon-JonesE. (2010d). The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorization. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 322-337. doi: 10.1080/02699930903378305
14.
GableP. A.Harmon-JonesE. (2011a). Attentional consequences of pre-goal and post-goal positive affects. Emotion, 11, 1358–1367. doi:10.1037/a0025611
15.
GableP. A.Harmon-JonesE. (2011b). Attentional states influence early neural responses associated with motivational processes: Local vs. global attentional scope and N1 amplitude to appetitive stimuli. Biological Psychology, 87, 303–305. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.007
16.
GableP. A.Harmon-JonesE. (2012). Reducing attentional capture of emotion by broadening attention: Increased global attention reduces early electrophysiological responses to negative stimuli. Biological Psychology, 90, 150–153. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.006
17.
GableP. A.Harmon-JonesE. (2013). Does arousal per se account for the influence of appetitive stimuli on attentional scope and the late positive potential?Psychophysiology, 50, 344–350. doi:10.1111/psyp.12023.
18.
GableP. A.PooleB. D.Harmon-JonesE. (2013). Anger perceptually and conceptually narrows cognitive scope. Manuscript in preparation.
19.
GasperK.CloreG. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34–40. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00406
20.
Harmon-JonesE.GableP. A. (2008). Incorporating motivational intensity and direction into the study of emotions: Implications for brain mechanisms of emotion and cognition-emotion interactions. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 64, 132–142. doi:10.1007/BF03076416
21.
Harmon-JonesE.GableP. A. (2009). Neural activity underlying the effect of approach-motivated positive affect on narrowed attention. Psychological Science, 20, 406–409. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02302.x
22.
Harmon-JonesE.GableP. A.PetersonC. K. (2010). The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: A review and update. Biological Psychology, 84, 451–462. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.08.010
23.
Harmon-JonesE.GableP. A.PriceT. F. (2011). Leaning embodies desire: Evidence that leaning forward increases relative left frontal cortical activation to appetitive stimuli. Biological Psychology, 87, 311–313. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.009
24.
Harmon-JonesE.Harmon-JonesC.AmodioD. M.GableP. A. (2011). Attitudes toward emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1332–1350. doi:10.1037/a0024951
25.
Harmon-JonesE.Harmon-JonesC.PriceT. F. (in press). What is approach motivation?Emotion Review.
26.
HicksJ. A.FriedmanR. F.GableP.DavisW. E. (2012). Interactive effects of approach motivational intensity and alcohol cues on the scope of perceptual attention. Addiction, 107, 1074–1080. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03781.x
27.
IsenA. M.DaubmanK. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206–1217. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1206
28.
KaplanR. L.Van DammeI.LevineL. J. (2012). Motivation matters: Differing effects of pre-goal and post-goal emotions on attention and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 404, 1–9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00404
29.
KimchiR.PalmerS. E. (1982). Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 521–535. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.4.521
30.
KnutsonB.WimmerG. E. (2007). Reward: Neural circuitry for social valuation. In Harmon-JonesE.WinkielmanP. (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior (pp. 157–175). New York: Guilford Press.
31.
NavonD. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
32.
NewmanJ. P.Baskin-SommersA. R. (2011). Early selective attention abnormalities in Psychopathy: Implications for self-regulation. In PoserM. (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 421–440). New York: Guilford Press.
33.
PetersonC. K.Harmon-JonesE. (2012). Toward an understanding of the emotion-modulated startle eyeblink reflex: The case of anger. Psychophysiology, 49, 1509–1522. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01469.x
34.
PriceT. F.DieckmanL.Harmon-JonesE. (2012). Embodying approach motivation: Body posture influences startle eyeblink and event-related potential responses to appetitive stimuli. Biological Psychology, 90, 211–217. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.04.001
35.
PriceT. F.Harmon-JonesE. (2010). The effect of embodied emotive states on cognitive categorization. Emotion, 10, 934–938. doi:10.1037/a0019809
36.
RoweG.HirshJ. B.AndersonA. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 383–388. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605198104
37.
SteeleC. M.JosephsR. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921–933. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.45.8.921
38.
von HeckerU.MeiserT. (2005). Defocused attention in depressed mood: Evidence from source monitoring. Emotion, 5, 456–463. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.456
