Knowledge in memory is vast and not always relevant to the task at hand. Recent views suggest that the human cognitive system has evolved so that it includes goal-driven control mechanisms to regulate the level of activation of specific pieces of knowledge and make distracting or unwanted information in memory less accessible. This operation is primarily directed to facilitate the use of task-relevant knowledge. However, these control processes may also have side effects on performance in a variety of situations when the task at hand partly relies on access to suppressed information. In this article, we show that various types of information to be used in a variety of different contexts (problem solving, decision making based on personal information, language production) may be the target of inhibitory control. We also show that the control process may leave a behavioral signature if suppressed information turns out to be relevant shortly after being suppressed.
AbutalebiJ.GreenD. W. (2016). Neuroimaging of language control in bilinguals: Neural adaptation and reserve. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(4), 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000225
AtkinsonR. C.ShiffrinR. M. (1968). Chapter: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In SpenceK. W.SpenceJ. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3
4.
BekinschteinP.WeisstaubN. V.GalloF.RennerM.AndersonM. C. (2018). A retrieval-specific mechanism of adaptive forgetting in the mammalian brain. Nature Communications, 9, Article 4660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07128-7
5.
BotezatuM. R.KrollJ. F.TrachselM. I.GuoT. (2020). Second language immersion impacts native language lexical production and comprehension. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19059.bot
ChanJ. C. K. (2009). When does retrieval induce forgetting and when does it induce facilitation? Implications for retrieval inhibition, testing effect, and text processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.004
8.
ChoS.MoodyT. D.FernandinoL.MumfordJ. A.PoldrackR. A.CannonT. D.KnowltonB. J.HolyoakK. J. (2010). Common and dissociable prefrontal loci associated with component mechanisms of analogical reasoning. Cerebral Cortex, 20(3), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp121
9.
DoumasL. A. A.MorrisonR. G.RichlandL. E. (2018). Individual differences in relational learning and analogical reasoning: A computational model of longitudinal change. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01235
FerreiraC. S.MaraverM. J.HanslmayrS.BajoT. (2019). Theta oscillations show impaired interference detection in older adults during selective memory retrieval. Scientific Reports, 9, Article 9977. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46214-8
12.
FerreiraC. S.MarfulA.BajoT. (2014). Interference resolution in face perception and name retrieval. Acta Psychologica, 153, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.012
13.
Gómez-ArizaC. J.del PreteF.Prieto del ValL.ValleT.BajoM. T.FernandezA. (2017). Memory inhibition as a critical factor preventing creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(6), 986–996. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000348
14.
HoughtonG.TipperS. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In DagenbachD.CarrT. (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp. 53–112). Academic Press.
15.
Iglesias-ParroS.Gómez-ArizaC. J. (2006). Biasing decision making by means of retrieval practice. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18(6), 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440500501189
16.
KrawczykD. C.MorrisonR. G.ViskontasI.HolyoakK. J.ChowT. W.MendezM. F.MillerB. L.KnowltonB. J. (2008). Distraction during relational reasoning: The role of prefrontal cortex in interference control. Neuropsychologia, 46(7), 2020–2032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.001
17.
KrollJ. F.DussiasP. E.BajoM. T. (2018). Language use across international contexts: Shaping the minds of L2 speakers. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190518000119
18.
LechugaM. T.Gómez-ArizaC. J.Iglesias-ParroS.PelegrinaS. (2012). Memory dynamics and decision making in younger and older adults. Psicológica, 33(2), 257–274.
19.
LinckJ. A.KrollJ. F.SundermanG. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1507–1515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x
20.
MacizoP.BajoT.MartínM. C. (2010). Inhibitory processes in bilingual language comprehension: Evidence from Spanish–English interlexical homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.04.002
21.
MarfulA.Gómez-AmadoJ. C.FerreiraC. S.BajoM. T. (2015). Face naming and retrieval inhibition in old and very old age. Experimental Aging Research, 41(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2015.978205
22.
MarfulA.PaolieriD.BajoM. T. (2014). Is naming faces different from naming objects? Semantic interference in a face- and object-naming task. Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0376-8
McKoneE.KanwisherN.DuchaineB. C. (2007). Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.002
25.
MiguelesM.García-BajosE. (2007). Selective retrieval and induced forgetting in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(9), 1157–1172. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1323
26.
MoralesL.PaolieriD.BajoM. T. (2011). Grammatical gender inhibition in bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00284
27.
MurayamaK.MiyatsuT.BuchliD.StormB. C. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: A meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulle-tin, 140(5), 1383–1409. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037505
28.
OrtegaA.Gómez-ArizaC. J.RománP.BajoM. T. (2012). Memory inhibition, aging, and the executive deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024510
29.
RománP.SorianoM. F.Gómez-ArizaC. J.BajoM. T. (2009). Retrieval-induced forgetting and executive control. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1053–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02415.x
30.
RugoK. F.TamlerK. N.WoodmanG. F.MaxceyA. M. (2017). Recognition-induced forgetting of faces in visual long-term memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(7), 1878–1885. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1419-1
31.
ShaoZ.RoelofsA.MartinR. C.MeyerA. S. (2015). Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color–word Stroop tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1806–1820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039363
32.
SorianoM. F.JiménezJ. F.RománP.BajoM. T. (2009). Inhibitory processes in memory are impaired in schizophrenia: Evidence from retrieval induced forgetting. British Journal of Psychology, 100(4), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X418912
33.
StormB. C.AngelloG. (2010). Overcoming fixation: Creative problem solving and retrieval-induced -forgetting. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1263–1265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610379864
34.
StormB. C.WhiteH. A. (2010). ADHD and retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a deficit in the inhibitory control of memory. Memory, 18(3), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210903547884
35.
ValleT. M.BajoM. T.Gómez-ArizaC. J. (2020). Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex cancels out the cost of selective retrieval on subsequent analogical reasoning. Neuropsychologia, 141, Article 107431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107431
36.
ValleT. M.Gómez-ArizaC. J.BajoM. T. (2019). Inhibitory control during selective retrieval may hinder subsequent analogical thinking. PLOS ONE, 14(2), Article e0211881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211881
37.
WellerP. D.AndersonM. C.Gómez-ArizaC. J.BajoM. T. (2013). On the status of cue independence as a criterion for memory inhibition: Evidence against the covert blocking hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1232–1245. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030335
38.
WimberM.AlinkA.CharestI.KriegeskorteN.AndersonM. C. (2015). Retrieval induces adaptive forgetting of competing memories via cortical pattern suppression. Nature Neuroscience, 18(4), 582–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3973
