We describe four major approaches to the study of science–historical accounts of scientific discoveries, psychological experiments with nonscientists working on tasks related to scientific discoveries, direct observation of ongoing scientific laboratories, and computational modeling of scientific discovery processes–by viewing them through the lens of the theory of human problem solving. We compare and contrast the different approaches, indicate their complementarities, and provide examples from each approach that converge on a set of principles of scientific discovery.
CrickF. (1988). What mad pursuit: A personal view of scientific discovery.New York: Basic Books.
2.
DunbarK. (1993). Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 17, 397–434.
3.
DunbarK. (1994). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. InSternbergR.J.DavidsonJ. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
GrasshoffG.MayM. (1995). From historical case studies to systematic methods of discovery: Working notes. In American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium on Systematic Methods of Scientific Discovery (pp. 45–56). Stanford, CA: AAAI.
5.
HolmesF.L. (1991). Hans Krebs: The formation of a scientific life, 1900–1933, Volume 1.New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
JacobF.MonodJ. (1961). Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 3, 318–356.
7.
JudsonH.F. (1996). The eighth day of creation: Makers of the revolution in biology (expanded ed.). Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press.
8.
KlahrD.DunbarK. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1–55.
9.
KlahrD.FayA.L.DunbarK. (1993). Heuristics for scientific experimentation: A developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 111–146.
10.
KulkarniD.SimonH.A. (1988). The process of scientific discovery: The strategy of experimentation. Cognitive Science, 12, 139–176.
11.
NersessianN.J. (1984). Faraday to Einstein: Constructing meaning in scientific theories.Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
SchunnC.D.AndersonJ.R. (1999). The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 23, 337–370.
14.
ThagardP. (1998). Ulcers and bacteria: I. Discovery and acceptance. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Science, 9, 107–136.
