Conflict resolution and intergroup reconciliation are difficult to achieve because of many social and psychological obstacles, such as people’s belief that members of a social group that is an adversary of their own group are mostly bad and essentially all the same. In this article, we introduce a novel intervention aimed at challenging these beliefs by exposing people to stories about individuals who have risked some important aspects of their lives to save the lives of other social groups’ members (moral exemplars). The effects of this moral-exemplar intervention have been tested with field experiments in several postconflict contexts using members of real antagonistic groups. We discuss the results of these studies and three specific and important aspects of the moral-exemplar intervention: (a) its comparative advantage over existing social-psychological interventions aimed at conflict resolution and intergroup reconciliation, (b) its content and conditions, and (c) implications for future theorizing and research targeting prosocial changes in attitudes and intergroup behavior.
Bar-TalD.HameiriB. (2020). Interventions to change well-anchored attitudes in the context of intergroup conflict. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(7), Article e12534. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12534
2.
BenedaM.WitkowskaM.KhachatryanN.GrigoryanN.BilewiczM. (2018). Change in perceived outgroup morality increases forgiveness in post-genocide settings—Study of the moral exemplars. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 25(2), 193–212.
3.
BigazziS.CsernusF.SerdültS.TakácsB.BokrétásI.GéczyD. (2019). Harmful memories—present dynamics: The heroic helper’s effect on collective and individual responsibility and prejudice. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(9), 176–206.
4.
BilaliR. (2013). National narrative and social psychological influences in Turks’ denial of the mass killings of Armenians as genocide. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 16–33.
5.
BilewiczM. (2016). The dark side of emotion regulation: Historical defensiveness as an obstacle in reconciliation. Psychological Inquiry, 27(2), 89–95.
6.
BilewiczM.BabińskaM. (in press). Perceptions of Poles’ bystandership during the Holocaust as an expression of antisemitic prejudice. In VaradiL.MillerM. (Eds.), Prejudice and perception: Jews and antisemitism in Central Europe. Central European University Press.
7.
BilewiczM.JaworskaM. (2013). Reconciliation through the righteous: The narratives of heroic helpers as a fulfillment of emotional needs in Polish–Jewish intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12009
8.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.PagliaroS.EllemersN. (2013). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(5), 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.005
9.
Čehajić-ClancyS.BilewiczM. (2017). Fostering reconciliation through historical moral exemplars in a postconflict society. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23(3), 288–296. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pac0000210
10.
Čehajić-ClancyS.BilewiczM. (2020). Appealing to moral exemplars: Shared perceptions of morality as a key dimension of intergroup reconciliation. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12067
11.
Čehajić-ClancyS.EffronD. A.HalperinE.LibermanV.RossL. D. (2011). Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023936
12.
Čehajić-ClancyS.GoldenbergA.GrossJ. J.HalperinE. (2016). Social-psychological interventions for intergroup reconciliation: An emotion regulation perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 27(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1153945
13.
Cohen-ChenS.HalperinE.CrispR. J.GrossJ. J. (2014). Hope in the Middle East: Malleability beliefs, hope, and the willingness to compromise for peace. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613484499
14.
DeutschR.FazioH. (2008). How subtyping shapes perception: Predictable exceptions to the rule reduce attention to stereotype-associated dimensions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.001
15.
DovidioJ.GaertnerS. L.KafatiG. (2000). Group identity and intergroup relations: The common in-group identity model. In ThyeS. R.LawlerE. J.MacyM. W.WalkerH. A. (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Vol. 17 (pp. 1–35). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(00)17002-X
16.
EnsariN.MillerN. (2002). The out-group must not be so bad after all: The effects of disclosure, typicality, and salience on intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.313
17.
GalinskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708
18.
GayerC. C.LandmanS.HalperinE.Bar-TalD. (2009). Overcoming psychological barriers to peaceful conflict resolution: The role of arguments about losses. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(6), 951–975. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002709346257
19.
GrossmanC. (1987). The underground army: Fighters of the Bialystok ghetto (LewisS., Ed.; BeeriS., Trans.). Holocaust Library.
HalperinE.Bar-TalD. (2011). Socio-psychological barriers to peace making: An empirical examination within the Israeli Jewish society. Journal of Peace Research, 48(5), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311412642
22.
HalperinE.RussellA. G.TrzesniewskiK. H.GrossJ. J.DweckC. S. (2011). Promoting the Middle East peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science, 333(6050), 1767–1769. https://doi.org/10.1125/science.1202925
23.
HameiriB.PoratR.Bar-TalD.BielerA.HalperinE. (2014). Paradoxical thinking as a new avenue of intervention to promote peace. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111(30), 10996–11001. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407055111
24.
HanH.KimJ.JeongC.CohenG. L. (2017). Attainable and relevant moral exemplars are more effective than extraordinary exemplars in promoting voluntary service engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 283. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00283
25.
HeinG.EngelmannJ. B.VollbergM. C.ToblerP. N. (2016). How learning shapes the empathic brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514539112
26.
HiltonD. J.LiuJ. H. (2017). History as the narrative of a people: From function to structure and content. Memory Studies, 10(3), 297–309.
27.
HorsneyM. J.WohlM. (2013). We are sorry: Intergroup apologies and their tenuous link with intergroup forgiveness. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2013.822206
28.
JankovićA.Čehajić-ClancyS. (2021). The power of the media on peace and reconciliation processes: Representing former enemy groups as moral versus immoral matters. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F18344909211002561
29.
LeachC. W.BilaliR.PagliaroS. (2015). Groups and morality. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.DovidioJ. F.SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 2. Group processes (pp. 123–149). American Psychological Association.
30.
LeachC. W.ZeinnedineF. B.Čehajić-ClancyS. (2013). Moral immemorial: The rarity of self-criticism for previous generations’ genocide. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 34–53.
31.
OlssonA.KnapskaE.LindströmB. (2020). The neural and computational systems of social learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21, 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0276-4
32.
PettigrewT.TroppL. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
ShnabelN.NadlerA.UllrichJ.DovidioJ. F.CarmiD. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 1021–1030.
35.
WitkowskaM.BenedaM.Čehajić-ClancyS.BilewiczM. (2019). Fostering contact after historical atrocities: The potential of moral exemplars. Political Psychology, 40(3), 565–582.
36.
ZimbardoP. (2011). Why the world needs heroes. European Journal of Psychology, 7(3), 402–407.
