Although cultural wisdom warns us not to judge a book by its cover, we seem unable to inhibit this tendency even though it can lead to inaccurate impressions of people’s psychological traits and has significant social consequences. One explanation for this paradox is that first impressions from faces reflect overgeneralizations of adaptive impressions of categories of people with structurally similar faces (including babies, familiar or unfamiliar people, evolutionarily unfit people, and people expressing a variety of emotions). Research testing these overgeneralization hypotheses has elucidated why we form first impressions from faces, what impressions we form, and what cues influence these impressions. This article focuses on commonalities in impressions across diverse perceivers, with additional brief attention given to individual differences in impressions and impression accuracy.
CarneyD. R.ColvinC. R.HallJ. A. (2007). A thin-slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions. Journal of Personality, 41, 1054–1072. An article that discusses the accuracy of first impressions given multimodal dynamic information that varies in duration.
2.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN.AdamsR. B.Jr.OzonoH.NakashimaS.YoshikawaS.WatabeM. (2010). Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 1–15. A study illustrating original research about trait impressions from faces
3.
SecordP. F.DukesW. F.BevanW. (1954). (See References). A historical classic—one of the first empirical articles on trait impressions from faces.
4.
ZebrowitzL. A. (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul?Boulder, CO: Westview Press. A user-friendly and abundantly illustrated account of first impressions from faces that provides more historical background and more elaboration on the baby-face and unfit-face overgeneralization effects than the current article.
5.
ZebrowitzL. A.MontepareJ. M. (2014). Faces and first impressions. In BarghJ.BorgidaG. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Vol. 1. Attitudes and social cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. A relatively comprehensive review for readers who wish to expand their knowledge of first impressions from faces, with more attention to social and psychological consequences than the current article.
6.
AschS. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.
7.
BerryD. S.McArthurL. Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3–18.
8.
BlairL.JuddC. M.SadlerM. S.JenkinsC. (2002). The role of Afrocentric features in person perception: Judging by features and categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 5–25.
9.
BoshyanJ.ZebrowitzL. A.FranklinR. G.McCormickC. M.CarréJ. M. (2014). Age similarities in recognizing threat from faces and diagnostic cues. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 69B, 710–718.
10.
CogsdillE. J.TodorovA. T.SpelkeE. S.BanajiM. R. (2014). Inferring character from faces: A developmental study. Psychological Science, 25, 1132–1139.
11.
DeBruineL. (2002). Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1307–1312.
12.
EaglyA. H.AshmoreR. D.MakhijaniM. G.LongoL. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but . . .: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128.
13.
FriedmanH.ZebrowitzL. A. (1992). The contribution of facial maturity to sex-role stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 430–438.
14.
GangestadS. W.BussD. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89–96.
HillT.LewickiP.CzyzewskaM.SchullerG. (1990). The role of learned inferential encoding rules in the perception of faces: Effects of nonconscious self-perpetuation of a bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 350–371.
17.
KeatingC. F.BaiD. L. (1986). Children’s attributions of social dominance from facial cues. Child Development, 57, 1269–1276.
18.
KeatingC. F.MazurA.SegallM. H. (1981). A cross-cultural exploration of physiognomic traits of dominance and happiness. Ethology and Sociobiology, 2, 41–48.
19.
LangloisJ. H.RoggmanL. A.Rieser-DannerL. A. (1990). Infants’ differential social responses to attractive and unattractive faces. Developmental Psychology, 26, 153–159.
20.
LewickiP. (1985). Nonconscious biasing effects of single instances on subsequent judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 563–574.
21.
McArthurL. Z.BaronR. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215–238.
22.
MontepareJ. M.DobishH. (2003). The contribution of emotion perceptions and their overgeneralizations to trait impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 237–254.
23.
MontepareJ. M.ZebrowitzL. A. (1998). Person perception comes of age: The salience and significance of age in social judgments. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 93–163). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
MontepareJ. M.Zebrowitz-McArthurL. (1989). Children’s perceptions of babyfaced adults. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 69, 467–472.
25.
NeubergS. L.KenrickD. T.SchallerM. (2011). Human threat management systems: Self–protection and disease avoidance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1042–1051.
26.
OlivolaC. Y.TodorovA. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 83–110.
27.
RhodesG. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.
28.
RosenbergS.NelsonC.VivekananthanP. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294.
29.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2011). Face and fortune: Inferences of personality from Managing Partners’ faces predict their law firms’ financial success. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 690–696.
30.
RuleN. O.KrendlA. C.IvcevicZ.AmbadyN. (2013). Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 409–426.
31.
SaidC. P.SebeN.TodorovA. (2009). Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces. Emotion, 9, 260–264. doi:10.1037/a0014681
32.
SecordP. F.DukesW. F.BevanW. (1954). Personalities in faces: I. An experiment in social perceiving. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 49, 231–270.
33.
TodorovA.OlivolaC. Y.DotschR.Mende-SiedleckiP. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519–545.
34.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.
35.
ZebrowitzL. A. (2011). Ecological and social approaches to face perception. In CalderA. J.RhodesG.HaxbyJ. V.JohnsonM. H. (Eds.), The handbook of face perception (pp. 31–50). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36.
ZebrowitzL. A.BronstadP. M.LeeH. K. (2007). The contribution of face familiarity to ingroup favoritism and stereotyping. Social Cognition, 25, 306–338.
37.
ZebrowitzL. A.CollinsM. A. (1997). Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 203–222.
38.
ZebrowitzL. A.FellousJ. M.MignaultA.AndreolettiC. (2003). Trait impressions as overgeneralized responses to adaptively significant facial qualities: Evidence from connectionist modeling. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 194–215.
39.
ZebrowitzL. A.FranklinR. G.Jr.BoshyanJ.LuevanoV.AgrigoroaeiS.MilosavljevicB.LachmanM. E. (2014). Older and younger adults’ accuracy in discerning health and competence in older and younger faces [Special Section: Social Perception and Aging]. Psychology and Aging, 29, 454–468. doi:10.1037/a0036255
40.
ZebrowitzL. A.KikuchiM.FellousJ. M. (2010). Facial resemblance to emotions: Group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 175–189.
41.
ZebrowitzL. A.McDonaldS. (1991). The impact of litigants’ baby-facedness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 603–623.
42.
ZebrowitzL. A.RhodesG. (2004). Sensitivity to ‘bad genes’ and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: Accuracy, cue validity, and cue utilization in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 167–185.
43.
ZebrowitzL. A.WangR.BronstadP. M.EisenbergD.UndurragaE.Reyes-GarcíaV.GodoyR. (2012). First impressions from faces among U.S. and culturally isolated Tsimane’ people in the Bolivian rainforest. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 119–134.
44.
ZebrowitzL. A.WhiteB.WienekeK. (2008). Mere exposure and racial prejudice: Exposure to other-race faces increases liking for strangers of that race. Social Cognition, 26, 259–275.
