In this article, we identify five disparate themes that guide the processing of ethical judgment and behavior on the basis of current research drawn from multiple disciplinary fields. We then suggest directions for integrative research that consider ethical judgment and behavior as emergent outcomes of dynamic processing systems.
BassettD. S.GazzanigaM. S. (2011). Understanding complexity in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 200–209.
5.
BazermanM. H.GinoF. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 85–104.
6.
BlessH. (2001). Mood and the use of general knowledge structures. In MartinL. L. (Ed.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 9–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
ConwayP.PeetzJ. (2012). When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 907–919.
8.
DamasioA. R. (2005). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London, England: Penguin Books.
9.
DehaeneS.NaccacheL. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1–37.
10.
DinhJ. E.LordR. G.HoffmanE. (in press). Leadership perception and information processing: Influences of symbolic, connectionist, emotion, and embodied architectures. In DayD. V. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
FeinbergM.WillerR.AntonenkoO.JohnO. P. (2012). Liberating reason from the passions: Overriding intuitionist moral judgments through emotional reappraisal. Psychological Science, 23, 788–795.
12.
GinoF.SchweitzerM. E.MeadN. L.ArielyD. (2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 191–203.
13.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385.
14.
GreeneJ. D.SommervilleR. B.NystromL. E.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.
15.
GusnardD. A. (2005). Being a self: Considerations from functional imaging. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 679–697.
16.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.
17.
HolyoakK. J.SimonD. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 3–31.
18.
Immordino-YangM. H. (2011). Me, my “self” and you: Neuropsychological relations between social emotion, self-awareness, and morality. Emotional Review, 3, 313–315.
19.
JohnsonR. E.LordR. G. (2010). Implicit effects of justice on self-identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 681–695.
20.
KleimanT.HassinR. R. (2011). Non-conscious goal conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 521–532.
21.
KohlbergL. (1981). The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
22.
LeavittK.ReynoldsS. J.BarnesC. M.SchilpzandP.HannahS. T. (2012). Different hats, different obligations: Plural occupational identities and situated moral judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1316–1333.
23.
LeBoeufR. A.ShafirE.BayukJ. B. (2010). The conflicting choices of alternative selves. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111, 48–61.
24.
LiebermanM. D.GauntR.GilbertD. T.TropeY. (2002). Reflection and reflexion: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 199–249.
25.
LiljenquistK.ZhongC. B.GalinskyA. D. (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21, 381–383.
26.
MollJ.ZahnR.de Oliveira-SouzaR.KruegerF.GrafmanJ. (2005). The neural basis of human cognition. Neuroscience, 6, 799–809.
27.
MoninB.MillerD. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33–43.
28.
MurphyS. T.ZajoncR. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723–739.
29.
NewellA. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
PankseppJ. (2000). Emotion as natural kinds within the mammalian brain. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 137–156). New York, NY: Guilford.
31.
PfeiferR.BongardJ. (2006). How the body shapes the way we think. London, England: The MIT Press.
32.
RaiT. S.FiskeA. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 18, 57–75.
33.
RawnC. D.VohsK. D. (2011). People use self-control to risk personal harm: An intra-interpersonal dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 267–289.
34.
RestJ. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York, NY: Praeger
35.
ReynoldsS. J. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 737–748.
36.
SchnallS.BentonJ.HarveyS. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219–1222.
37.
SchnallS.RoperJ. (2011). Elevation puts moral values into action. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 1, 1–6.
38.
TenbrunselA. E.Smith-CroweK. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 545–607.
39.
VincentL. C.EmichK. J.GoncaloJ. A. (2013). Stretching the moral gray zone: Positive affect, moral disengagement and dishonesty. Psychological Science, 24, 595–599.
40.
YangJ.DiefendorffJ. M. (2009). The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: A diary study in Hong Kong. Personnel Psychology, 62, 259–295.
