People’s minds sometimes wander from ongoing activities. Although these experiences can be pleasant and useful, they are often unintentional and precipitate mistakes. In this article, we adopt an individual-differences perspective in considering unwanted mind wandering as an indicator of both momentary failures of and enduring deficiencies in executive-control functions. We describe research that associates normal variation in working memory capacity (WMC)—a cognitive ability that broadly predicts intellectual capabilities and accomplishments—with off-task thinking. In laboratory and daily-life assessments, people with lower WMC mind wander more frequently than do those with higher WMC, at least during demanding tasks. Moreover, the error-proneness of lower-WMC subjects seems to arise partly from their vulnerability to mind wandering. Executive control over one’s thoughts therefore seems to contribute to the effective regulation of behavior.
BairdB.SmallwoodJ.MrazekM. D.KannJ.FranklinM. S.SchoolerJ. S. (in press). Mind-wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science.
2.
CheyneJ. A.SolmanG. J. F.CarriereJ. S. A.SmilekD. (2009). Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors. Cognition, 111, 98–113.
3.
ConwayA. R. A.JarroldC.KaneM. J.MiyakeA.TowseJ. (2007). Variation in working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4.
DanemanM.MerikleP. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433.
5.
EngleR. W.KaneM. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In RossB. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 145–199). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6.
JacksonJ. D.BalotaD. A. (2012). Mind-wandering in younger and older adults: Converging evidence from the sustained attention to response task and reading for comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27, 106–119.
7.
KaneM. J.BrownL. E.McVayJ. C.SilviaP. J.Myin-GermeysI.KwapilT. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18, 614–621.
8.
KaneM. J.EngleR. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70.
9.
KaneM. J.PooleB. J.TuholskiS. W.EngleR. W. (2006). Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of “executive attention.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 749–777.
10.
KlingerE. (1971). Structure and functions of fantasy. New York, NY: Wiley.
11.
LevinsonD. B.SmallwoodJ.DavidsonR. J. (2012). The persistence of thought: Evidence for a role of working memory in the maintenance of task-unrelated thinking. Psychological Science. Advance online publication. doi:0.1177/09567976114314650.1177/0956797611431465
12.
McVayJ. C.KaneM. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 196–204.
13.
McVayJ. C.KaneM. J. (2012a). Drifting from slow to “D’oh!”: Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 525–549.
14.
McVayJ. C.KaneM. J. (2012b). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 302–320.
15.
McVayJ. C.KaneM. J.KwapilT. R. (2009). Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: An experience-sampling study of mind-wandering across controlled and ecological contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 857–863.
16.
MeierM. E.KaneM. J. (in press). Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: Global versus local indices of executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a002920010.1037/a0029200
17.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14.
18.
MrazekM. D.SmallwoodJ.FranklinM. S.ChinJ. M.BairdB.SchoolerJ. W. (in press). The role of mind-wandering in measurements of general aptitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. doi:10/1037/a002796810/1037/a0027968
19.
MrazekM. D.SmallwoodJ.SchoolerJ. W. (2012). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: Finding convergence through opposing constructs. Emotion, 12, 442–448.
20.
ReasonJ. T.MycielskaK. (1982). Absent minded? The psychology of mental lapses and everyday errors. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
SchoolerJ. W.SmallwoodJ.ChristoffK.HandyT. C.ReichleE. D.SayetteM. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 319–326.
22.
SchupakC.RosenthalJ. (2009). Excessive daydreaming: A case history and discussion of mind wandering and high fantasy proneness. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 290–292.
23.
SingerJ. L. (1975). The inner world of daydreaming. Oxford, England: Harper & Row.
24.
SmallwoodJ.McSpaddenM.SchoolerJ. W. (2008). When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1144–1150.
25.
UnsworthN.BrewerG. A.SpillersG. J. (2012). Variation in cognitive failures: An individual differences investigation of everyday attention and memory failures. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 1–16.
