Is There a Positive Association Between Working Memory Capacity and Mind Wandering in a Low-Demand Breathing Task? A Preregistered Replication of a Study by Levinson,Smallwood,and Davidson (2012)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2019
Is There a Positive Association Between Working Memory Capacity and Mind Wandering in a Low-Demand Breathing Task? A Preregistered Replication of a Study by Levinson,Smallwood,and Davidson (2012)
Levinson, Smallwood, and Davidson (2012, Experiment 2) found that working memory capacity (WMC) correlated positively with mind-wandering rates measured by thought probes in a breath-awareness task but was unassociated with the tendency to self-catch mind wandering. Here, I sought to replicate the associations between mind wandering and WMC in Levinson et al.’s breath-awareness task. The data from the current study, collected from 315 subjects (ns differed among analyses) and two measures of WMC, suggest that if WMC correlates with probe-caught mind wandering, the association is most likely negative. In addition, the evidence regarding self-caught mind wandering is consistent with that found by Levinson et al. for the sum of self-caught responses, but when self-caught responses were considered in proportion to probe-caught mind wandering, modest evidence was found for a positive association with WMC.
ConwayA. R.KaneM. J.BuntingM. F.HambrickD. Z.WilhelmO.EngleR. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.
2.
FosterJ. L.ShipsteadZ.HarrisonT. L.HicksK. L.RedickT. S.EngleR. W. (2015). Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 43, 226–236.
3.
JuY.-J.LienY.-W. (2018). Who is prone to wander and when? Examining an integrative effect of working memory capacity and mindfulness trait on mind wandering under different task loads. Consciousness and Cognition, 63, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.06.006
4.
KaneM. J.BrownL. H.McVayJ. C.SilviaP. J.Myin-GermeysI.KwapilT. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18, 614–621.
5.
KaneM. J.GrossG. M.ChunC. A.SmeekensB. A.MeierM. E.SilviaP. J.KwapilT. R. (2017). For whom the mind wanders, and when, varies across laboratory and daily-life settings. Psychological Science, 28, 1271–1289.
6.
KaneM. J.HambrickD. Z.TuholskiS. W.WilhelmO.PayneT. W.EngleR. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.
7.
KaneM. J.MeierM. E.SmeekensB. A.GrossG. M.ChunC. A.SilviaP. J.KwapilT. R. (2016). Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1017–1048.
8.
KassR. E.RafteryA. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795.
9.
LevinsonD. B.SmallwoodJ.DavidsonR. J. (2012). The persistence of thought: Evidence for a role of working memory in the maintenance of task-unrelated thinking. Psychological Science, 23, 375–380. doi:10.1177/0956797611431465
10.
LyA.EtzA.MarsmanM.WagenmakersE.-J. (2018). Replication Bayes factors from evidence updating. Behavior Research Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1092-x
11.
McVayJ. C.KaneM. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 196–204.
12.
McVayJ. C.KaneM. J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 188–207.
13.
McVayJ. C.MeierM. E.TouronD. R.KaneM. J. (2013). Aging ebbs the flow of thought: Adult age differences in mind wandering, executive control, and self-evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 142, 136–147.
14.
MeierM. E.SmeekensB. A.SilviaP. J.KwapilT. R.KaneM. J. (2018). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic–macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 68–84.
15.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
16.
RobisonM. K.GathK. I.UnsworthN. (2017). The neurotic wandering mind: An individual differences investigation of neuroticism, mind-wandering, and executive control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 649–663.
17.
RobisonM. K.UnsworthN. (2017). Working memory capacity and mind-wandering during low-demand cognitive tasks. Consciousness and Cognition, 52, 47–54.
18.
RummelJ.BoywittC. D. (2014). Controlling the stream of thought: Working memory capacity predicts adjustment of mind-wandering to situational demands. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1309–1315.
19.
SalthouseT. A. (1990). Working memory as a processing resource in cognitive aging. Developmental Review, 10, 101–124.
20.
SayetteM. A.SchoolerJ. W.ReichleE. D. (2010). Out for a smoke: The impact of cigarette craving on zoning out during reading. Psychological Science, 21, 26–30.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612.
23.
SeliP.SmilekD.RalphB. C.SchacterD. L. (2018). The awakening of the attention: Evidence for a link between the monitoring of mind wandering and prospective goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 431–443.
24.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
25.
SmallwoodJ. (2010). Why the global availability of mind wandering necessitates resource competition: Reply to McVay and Kane (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 202–207.
26.
SmallwoodJ.Andrews-HannaJ. (2013). Not all minds that wander are lost: The importance of a balanced perspective on the mind-wandering state. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 441. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00441
27.
UnsworthN.HeitzR. P.SchrockJ. C.EngleR. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.
28.
UnsworthN.McMillanB. D. (2013). Mind wandering and reading comprehension: Examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 832–842.
29.
UnsworthN.McMillanB. D. (2014). Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: A latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities. Acta Psychologica, 150, 14–25.
30.
WagenmakersE.-J.MarsmanM.JamilT.LyA.VerhagenJ.LoveJ.. . . MoreyR. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 35–57.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
