Working memory retains information and makes it available for processing. People often need to hold several chunks of information available while concentrating on only one of them. This process requires selective attention to the contents of working memory. In this article, we summarize evidence for both a broad focus of attention with a capacity of approximately four chunks and a narrow focus of attention that selects a single chunk at a time.
CowanN. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
3.
CowanN.ElliottE. M.SaultsJ. S.MoreyC. C.MattoxS.HismjatullinaA.ConwayA. R. A. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 42–100.
4.
DuncanJ.HumphreysG. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
5.
FougnieD.MaroisR. (2011). What limits working memory capacity? Evidence for modality-specific sources to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1329–1341.
6.
FukudaK.AwhE.VogelE. K. (2010). Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20, 177–182.
7.
FukudaK.VogelE. K.MayrU.AwhE. (2010). Quantity, not quality: The relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 673–679.
8.
GaravanH. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 263–276.
9.
GilchristA. L.CowanN. (2011). Can the focus of attention accommodate multiple, separate items?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1484–1502.
10.
GriffinI. C.NobreA. C. (2003). Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1176–1194.
11.
HoutkampR.RoelfsemaP. R. (2009). Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time. Psychological Research, 73, 317–326.
12.
Lewis-PeacockJ. A.DrysdaleA. T.OberauerK.PostleB. R. (2011). Neural evidence for a distinction between short-term memory and the focus of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 61–79.
13.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.
14.
MakovskiT.JiangY. V. (2007). Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1072–1078.
15.
MakovskiT.SussmanR.JiangY. V. (2008). Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 369–380.
16.
McElreeB. (2006). Accessing recent events. In RossB. H. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 46, pp. 155–200). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
McElreeB.DosherB. A. (1989). Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 346–373.
18.
OberauerK. (2001). Removing irrelevant information from working memory: A cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 948–957.
19.
OberauerK. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411–421.
20.
OberauerK. (2005a). Binding and inhibition in working memory: Individual and age differences in short-term recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 368–387.
21.
OberauerK. (2005b). Control of the contents of working memory: A comparison of two paradigms and two age groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 714–728.
22.
OberauerK. (2009). Design for a working memory. In RossB. H. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 51, pp. 45–100). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
OberauerK.BialkovaS. (2009). Accessing information in working memory: Can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 64–87.
24.
OberauerK.BialkovaS. (2011). Serial and parallel processes in working memory after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 606–614.
25.
OberauerK.KlieglR. (2006). A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 601–626.
26.
OberauerK.LewandowskyS. (2008). Forgetting in immediate serial recall: Decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference?Psychological Review, 115, 544–576.
27.
OliversC. N. L.PetersJ.HoutkampR.RoelfsemaP. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 327–334.
28.
ÖztekinI.McElreeB. (2010). Relationship between measures of working memory capacity and the time course of short-term memory retrieval and interference resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 383–397.
29.
SouzaA. S.OberauerK.GadeM.DrueyM. D. (in press). Processing of representations in declarative and procedural working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.64040310.1080/17470218.2011.640403
30.
SternbergS. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654.
31.
UnsworthN.EngleR. E. (2008). Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: An individual differences investigation of focus switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 616–630.
32.
VogelE. K.McColloughA. W.MachizawaM. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500–503.
