The Working Memory Stroop Effect: When Internal Representations Clash With External Stimuli

Abstract

Working memory (WM) has recently been described as internally directed attention, which implies that WM content should affect behavior exactly like an externally perceived and attended stimulus. We tested whether holding a color word in WM, rather than attending to it in the external environment, can produce interference in a color-discrimination task, which would mimic the classic Stroop effect. Over three experiments, the WM Stroop effect recapitulated core properties of the classic attentional Stroop effect, displaying equivalent congruency effects, additive contributions from stimulus- and response-level congruency, and susceptibility to modulation by the percentage of congruent and incongruent trials. Moreover, WM maintenance was inversely related to attentional demands during the WM delay between stimulus presentation and recall, with poorer memory performance following incongruent than congruent trials. Together, these results suggest that WM and attention rely on the same resources and operate over the same representations.

Keywords

working memory short-term memory visual attention selective attention open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

D. E.

Vogel

E. K.

Awh

(2013). A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychological Science, 24, 929–938. doi:10.1177/0956797612464380

Awh

Anllo-Vento

Hillyard

S. A.

(2000). The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 840–847. doi:10.1162/089892900562444

Awh

Jonides

(2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 119–126.

Awh

Jonides

Reuter-Lorenz

P. A.

(1998). Rehearsal in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 780–790. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.780

Baddeley

A. D.

Hitch

(1974). Working memory. In Bower

G. H.

(Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Barrouillet

Bernardin

Camos

(2004). Time constraints and resource sharing in adults’ working memory spans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 83–100.

Broadbent

D. E.

(1958). Perception and communication. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

Chen

Cowan

(2009). How verbal memory loads consume attention. Memory & Cognition, 37, 829–836. doi:10.3758/MC.37.6.829

Chun

M. M.

(2011). Visual working memory as visual attention sustained internally over time. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1407–1409. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.029

10.

Chun

M. M.

Johnson

M. K.

(2011). Memory: Enduring traces of perceptual and reflective attention. Neuron, 72, 520–535. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.026

11.

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

12.

Cohen

J. D.

Dunbar

McClelland

J. L.

(1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332

13.

Cowan

(1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–191. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163

14.

De Fockert

J. W.

(2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803–1806. doi:10.1126/science.1056496

15.

De Houwer

(2003). On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 31, 353–359. doi:10.3758/BF03194393

16.

Egner

Hirsch

(2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784–1790. doi:10.1038/nn1594

17.

Emrich

S. M.

Riggall

A. C.

LaRocque

J. J.

Postle

B. R.

(2013). Distributed patterns of activity in sensory cortex reflect the precision of multiple items maintained in visual short-term memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 6516–6523. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5732-12.2013

18.

Gazzaley

Nobre

A. C.

(2012). Top-down modulation: Bridging selective attention and working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 129–135. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.014

19.

Gratton

Coles

M. G.

Donchin

(1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480

20.

Hollingworth

Matsukura

Luck

S. J.

(2013). Visual working memory modulates rapid eye movements to simple onset targets. Psychological Science, 24, 790–796. doi:10.1177/0956797612459767

21.

Hollingworth

Maxcey-Richard

A. M.

(2013). Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1047–1058. doi:10.1037/a0030238

22.

Ikkai

Curtis

C. E.

(2011). Common neural mechanisms supporting spatial working memory, attention and motor intention. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1428–1434. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.020

23.

Johnson

M. R.

Higgins

J. A.

Norman

K. A.

Sederberg

P. B.

Smith

T. A.

Johnson

M. K.

(2013). Foraging for thought: An inhibition-of-return-like effect resulting from directing attention within working memory. Psychological Science, 24, 1104–1112. doi:10.1177/0956797612466414

24.

Kane

M. J.

Engle

R. W.

(2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47

25.

Kim

S.-Y.

Kim

M.-S.

Chun

M. M.

(2005). Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 16524–16529.

26.

Kiyonaga

Egner

(2013). Working memory as internal attention: Toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 228–242. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0359-y

27.

Kiyonaga

Egner

Soto

(2012). Cognitive control over working memory biases of selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 639–646. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0253-7

28.

Lepsien

Griffin

I. C.

Devlin

J. T.

Nobre

A. C.

(2005). Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load. NeuroImage, 26, 733–743. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.026

29.

Logan

G. D.

Zbrodoff

N. J.

(1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166–174. doi:10.3758/BF03197535

30.

MacLeod

C. M.

(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163

31.

Masson

Loftus

(2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203–220. doi:10.1037/h0087426

32.

Nobre

A. C.

Coull

J. T.

Maquet

Frith

C. D.

Vandenberghe

Mesulam

M. M.

(2004). Orienting attention to locations in perceptual versus mental representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 363–373. doi:10.1162/089892904322926700

33.

Oberauer

Hein

(2012). Attention to information in working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 164–169. doi:10.1177/0963721412444727

34.

Poole

B. J.

Kane

M. J.

(2009). Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: The influences of sustained and selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1430–1454. doi:10.1080/17470210802479329

35.

Postle

B. R.

(2006). Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience, 139, 23–38. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.005

36.

Ranganath

Cohen

M. X.

Dam

D’Esposito

(2004). Inferior temporal, prefrontal, and hippocampal contributions to visual working memory maintenance and associative memory retrieval. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 3917–3925. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5053-03.2004

37.

Saad

Silvanto

(2013). How visual short-term memory maintenance modulates subsequent visual aftereffects. Psychological Science, 24, 803–808. doi:10.1177/0956797612462140

38.

Serences

J. T.

Ester

E. F.

Vogel

E. K.

Awh

(2009). Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychological Science, 20, 207–214. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02276.x

39.

Soto

Hodsoll

Rotshtein

Humphreys

G. W.

(2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 342–348. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.007

40.

Stroop

J. R.

(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651

41.

Warren

R. E.

(1972). Stimulus encoding and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 90–100. doi:10.1037/h0032786

42.

Woodman

G. F.

Luck

S. J.

(2010). Why is information displaced from visual working memory during visual search? Visual Cognition, 18, 275–295. doi:10.1080/13506280902734326

43.

Woodman

G. F.

Vogel

E. K.

Luck

S. J.

(2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219–224.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.53 MB

0.58 MB