In this article I examine myths in the gene science debate, and their use as a tool in analysis of popular perceptions and public opinion of genetic science and gene technology. In daily language myth means something untrue, though theories of myth present them as carriers of knowledge and truth. I understand myth as a narrative, a cultural construct that aims to describe the world, its origin, and its constituent elements. I compare scholars’ usage of myths, considering their implications. I conclude that i) As an analytical tool the concept of myth is too loosely defined, or understood through theories which leave out context, social relations and interaction. This provides limited insight about myths and myth-making in present day society. ii) An updated understanding of myths, including location/context and interaction/process would enrich analysis.
BarthesR. ([1969] 1970) Mytologier. Malmö: Bo Caverfors Förlag.
2.
BellC. (1992) Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BellC. (1997) Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BowieF. (2000) The Anthropology of Religion: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
5.
CassirerE. (1955) The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume 2: Mythical Thought. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
6.
ConnertonP. (1989) How Societies Remember. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
DouglasM. (1967) “The Meaning of Myth, with Special Reference to ‘La Geste d’Astiwal’,” in LeachE. (ed.) The Structural Study of Myth and Totemism, pp. 49–69. London: Tavistock.
8.
DudleyG.III (1977) Religion on Trial: Mircea Eliade & His Critics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
9.
DundesA., ed. (1984) Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
EliadeM. ([1957] 1959) The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. The Significance of Religion, Myth, and Ritual within Life and Culture. San Diego and New York: Harvest (Harcourt Brace & Company).
11.
EliadeM. ([1958] 1974) Patterns in Comparative Religion. New York: Meridian (New American Library).
12.
HoM.-W. (2000) Genetic Engineering: Dream or Nightmare? Turning the Tide on the Brave New World of Bad Science and Big Business, 2nd edn.New York: Continuum.
13.
KellerE. F. (1995) Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
LeachE., ed. (1967) The Structural Study of Myth and Totemism. London: Tavistock.
15.
LessaW. A.VogtE. Z., eds (1979) Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological Approach, 4th edn.New York: HarperCollins.
16.
Lévi-StraussC. (1967) “The Story of Astiwal,” in LeachE. (ed.) The Structural Study of Myth and Totemism, pp. 1–47. London: Tavistock.
17.
LewontinR. C. (1991) Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA. London: Penguin.
18.
LundgrenE.SvalastogA. L. (2001) “Chapter 8: Den kontekstuelle kroppen,” “Chapter 9: Moderne identitet: betvingende begjær i kroppen,” “Chapter 10: Subjektet – individuelt og relasjonelt?,” in E. Lundgren Ekte kvinne? Identitet på kryss og tvers, pp. 212–314. Oslo: Pax.
19.
MalinowskiB. ([1926] 1971) Myth in Primitive Psychology. Westport, CT: Negro University Press.
20.
MorrisB. (1997) Anthropological Studies of Religion: An Introductory Text. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
NelkinD.LindeeM. S. (1995) The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
22.
NielsenT. H. (1996) Bioteknologi of opinion. Tre interventioner. Nr 103, Working Paper. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, TMV Senter for teknologi og menneskelige verdier, Forskningparken.
23.
NielsenT. H. (1997) Nyt om bioteknologi og opinion. Fire interventioner, 1997. Nr 108, Working Paper. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, TMV Senter for teknologi og menneskelige verdier, Forskningparken.
24.
NielsenT. H.MonsenA.TennøeT. (2000) Livets tre og kodenes kode. Fra genetikk til bioteknologi. Norge 1900–2000. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademiske.
25.
NielsenT. H.JelsøeE.ÔhmanS. (2002) “Traditional Blue and Modern Green Resistance,” in BauerM. W.GaskellG. (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, pp. 179–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
PadenW. E. (1994) Religious Worlds: The Comparative Study of Religion. Boston: Beacon Press.
27.
PalsD. L. (1996) Seven Theories of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
RennieB., ed. (2006) Mircea Eliade: A Critical Reader. London: Equinox.
29.
SamuelR.ThompsonP., eds (1990) The Myths We Live By. London: Routledge.
30.
Schüssler FiorenzaE. (2002) “Method in Women’s Studies in Religion: A Critical Feminist Hermeneutics,” in SharmaA. (ed.) Methodology in Religious Studies: The Interface with Women’s Studies, pp. 207–42. New York: State University of New York Press.
31.
SegerstråleU. (2000) Defenders of the Truth: The Sociobiology Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
StausbergM.SundqvistO.SvalastogA. L., eds (2002) Riter och ritteorier. Religionshistoriska diskussioner och teoretiska ansatser. Uppsala Research Reports in the History of Religions Nr 18. Nora: Nya Doxa.
33.
StrenskiI. (1987) Four Theories of Myth in Twentieth-Century History: Cassirer, Eliade, Levi-Strauss and Malinowski. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
34.
SundqvistO.SvalastogA. L., eds (1997) Myter och mytteorier. Religionshistoriska diskussioner och teoretiska ansatser. Uppsala Research Reports in the History of Religions Nr 10.
35.
SvalastogA. L. (1997) “Feministisk myteteori – en kulturanalytisk utfordring,” in SundqvistO.SvalastogA. L. (eds) Myter och mytteorier. Religionshistoriska diskussioner och teoretiska ansatser. Uppsala Research Reports in the History of Religions Nr 10, pp. 21–54.
36.
SvalastogA. L. (1998) “Det var ikke meningen … Om konstruksjon av kjønn ved abortinngrep, et feministteoretisk bidrag,” PhD thesis, University of Uppsala, 288 pp.
37.
SvalastogA. L. (2002) “Rituella övergrepp – vår kulturs hemliga hjärta? Om rit, modernitet, kultur och kontextualitet,” in StausbergM.SundqvistO.SvalastogA. L. (eds) Riter och ritteorier. Religionshistoriska diskussioner och teoretiska ansatser. Uppsala Research Reports in the History of Religions Nr 18, pp. 41–83 (also “Reflektioner,” pp. 38–40, 84–7, 132–4, 154–6, 216–19, 238–40, 254–6, 264–6). Nora: Nya Doxa.
SvalastogA. L.ErikssonS. (2010) “You Can Use my Name; You Don’t Have to Steal my Story – A Critique of Anonymity in Indigenous Studies,” Developing World Bioethics10(2): 104–10.
40.
TonkinE. (1990) “History and the Myth of Realism,” in SamuelR.ThompsonP. (eds) The Myths We Live By, pp. 23–35. London: Routledge.
41.
WhiteH. (1973) The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
