Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-4
Intention of health experts to counter health misinformation in social media: Effects of perceived threat to online users,correction efficacy,and self-affirmation
Our study analyzes the intention of Chinese health experts (health professionals and medical students) to correct health misinformation in social media. In an experimental 2 × 2 × 2 between-subjects factorial design (n = 415), we manipulated the experts’ perception of the threat that health misinformation poses for online users, their self-efficacy with respect to correcting misinformation, and their self-affirmation. To select the potential influence factors, we draw on self-affirmation theory and the extended parallel process model. Results of our experiment revealed that correction intention increases if experts perceive the threat for online users as severe, believe that they are capable of countering the impact of misinformation, and have a high motivation to maintain a positive self-image of caring for others. We discuss the consequences of our findings for motivating experts to help reduce the adverse effects of health misinformation in social media.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
2.
ArpanLMLeeYSWangZ (2017) Integrating self-affirmation with health risk messages: Effects on message evaluation and response. Health Communication32(2): 189–199.
3.
BodeLVragaEK (2018) See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication33(9): 1131–1140.
4.
BroniatowskiDAJamisonAMQiSHAlkulaibLChenTBentonA, et al. (2018) Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. American Journal of Public Health108(10): 1378–1384.
5.
CainJScottDRAkersP (2009) Pharmacy students’ Facebook activity and opinions regarding accountability and e-professionalism. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education73(6): 104.
6.
CarcioppoloNJensenJDWilsonSRCollinsWBCarrionMLinnemeierG (2013) Examining HPV threat-to-efficacy ratios in the extended parallel process model. Health Communication28(1): 20–28.
ChenLYangX (2019) Using EPPM to evaluate the effectiveness of fear appeal messages across different media outlets to increase the intention of breast self-examination among Chinese women. Health Communication34: 1369–1376.
9.
ChenLWangXPengTQ (2018) Nature and diffusion of gynecologic cancer-related misinformation on social media: Analysis of tweets. Journal of Medical Internet Research20(10): e11515.
10.
ChenMChenL (2021) Promoting smoking cessation in China: Using an expansion of the EPPM with other-oriented threat. Journal of Health Communication, 26, 174–183.
11.
ChuaAYBanerjeeS (2018) Intentions to trust and share online health rumors: An experiment with medical professionals. Computers in Human Behavior87: 1–9.
12.
ChurchillSJessopDCGreenRHarrisPR (2018) Self-affirmation improves self-control over snacking among participants low in eating self-efficacy. Appetite123: 264–268.
13.
CohenELHoffnerC (2013) Gifts of giving: The role of empathy and perceived benefits to others and self in young adults’ decisions to become organ donors. Journal of Health Psychology18(1): 128–138.
14.
CohenGLGarciaJ (2005) “I am us”: Negative stereotypes as collective threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89: 566–582.
15.
CrockerJNiiyaYMischkowskiD (2008) Why does writing about important values reduce defensiveness? Self-affirmation and the role of positive other-directed feelings. Psychological Science19(7): 740–747.
16.
EptonTHarrisPRKaneRvan KoningsbruggenGMSheeranP (2015) The impact of self-affirmation on health-behavior change: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology34(3): 187–196.
17.
EysenbachG (2020) How to fight an infodemic: The four pillars of infodemic management. Journal of Medical Internet Research22(6): e21820.
18.
GoeiRBoysonARLyon-CalloSKSchottCWasilevichECannarileS (2010) An examination of EPPM predictions when threat is perceived externally: An asthma intervention with school workers. Health Communication25(4): 333–344.
19.
HamannKRReeseG (2020) My influence on the world (of others): Goal efficacy beliefs and efficacy affect predict private, public, and activist pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues76(1): 35–53.
20.
HarrisPRNapperL (2005) Self-affirmation and the biased processing of threatening health-risk information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31: 1250–1263.
21.
HoSSGohTJLeungYW (2020) Let’s nab fake science news: Predicting scientists’ support for interventions using the influence of presumed media influence model. Journalism23. DOI: 10.1177/1464884920937488.
22.
HovlandCIJanisILKelleyHH (1953) Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
HsuMHJuTLYenCHChangCM (2007) Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies65(2): 153–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.09.003
24.
JanisIL (1967) Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and experimental research. In: BerkowitzL (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 3. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 166–224.
25.
KimSMcGillAL (2018) Helping others by first affirming the self: When self-affirmation reduces ego-defensive downplaying of others’ misfortunes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin44(3): 345–358.
26.
KimSCVragaEKCookJ (2021) An eye tracking approach to understanding misinformation and correction strategies on social media: The mediating role of attention and credibility to reduce HPV vaccine misperceptions. Health Communication36: 1687–1696.
27.
KleinWMHarrisPRFerrerRAZajacLE (2011) Feelings of vulnerability in response to threatening messages: Effects of self-affirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology47(6): 1237–1242.
28.
KouzyRAbi JaoudeJKraitemAEl AlamMBKaramBAdibE, et al. (2020) Coronavirus goes viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 misinformation epidemic on Twitter. Cureus12(3): e7255.
29.
KyeSYShimMKimYCParkK (2019) Sharing health information online in South Korea: Motives, topics, and antecedents. Health Promotion International34(2): 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dax074
30.
LeventhalH (1970) Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In: BerkowitzL (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 5. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 119–186.
31.
LibermanAChaikenS (1992) Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin18: 669–679.
32.
LimJS (2017) The third-person effect of online advertising of cosmetic surgery: A path model for predicting restrictive versus corrective actions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94(4): 972–993.
33.
LindsayEKCreswellJD (2014) Helping the self help others: Self-affirmation increases self-compassion and pro-social behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology5: 421.
34.
MaZNanXIlesIAButlerJFeldmanRWangMQ (2021) Effects of self-affirmation on responses toward graphic cigarette warning labels: Testing the mediating role of perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy. Health Education121: 1–15.
35.
McQueenAKleinWMP (2006) Experimental manipulation of self-affirmation: A systematic review. Self and Identity5: 289–354.
36.
MorrisonK (2005) Motivating women and men to take protective action against rape: Examining direct and indirect persuasive fear appeals. Health Communication18(3): 237–256.
37.
MullanJBurnsPWestonKMcLennanPRichWCrowtherS, et al. (2017) Health literacy amongst health professional university students: A study using the Health Literacy Questionnaire. Education Sciences7(2): 54.
38.
NapperLEHarrisPRKleinWM (2014) Combining self-affirmation with the extended parallel process model: The consequences for motivation to eat more fruit and vegetables. Health Communication29(6): 610–618.
39.
OhHJLeeH (2019) When do people verify and share health rumors on social media? The effects of message importance, health anxiety, and health literacy. Journal of Health Communication24(11): 837–847.
40.
PanahiSWatsonJPartridgeH (2016) Social media and physicians: Exploring the benefits and challenges. Health Informatics Journal22(2): 99–112.
41.
PennycookGMcPhetresJZhangYLuJGRandDG (2020) Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science31(7): 770–780.
42.
RobertoAJMongeauPALiuYHashiEC (2019) “Fear the flu, not the flu Shot”: A test of the extended parallel process model. Journal of Health Communication24(11): 829–836.
43.
Schmid-PetriHBürgerM (2021) The effect of misinformation and inoculation: Replication of an experiment on the effect of false experts in the context of climate change communication. Public Understanding of Science31: 152–167.
44.
SharonAJBaram-TsabariA (2020) The experts’ perspective of “ask-an-expert”: An interview-based study of online nutrition and vaccination outreach. Public Understanding of Science29(3): 252–269.
45.
SillenceEBriggsPHarrisPRFishwickL (2007) How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information?Social Science & Medicine64(9): 1853–1862.
46.
SmithSWRosenmanKDKotowskiMRGlazerEMcFetersCKeeseckerNM, et al. (2008) Using the EPPM to create and evaluate the effectiveness of brochures to increase the use of hearing protection in farmers and landscape workers. Journal of Applied Communication Research36(2): 200–218.
47.
SongHOmoriKKimJTenzekKEHawkinsJMLinWY, et al. (2016) Trusting social media as a source of health information: Online surveys comparing the United States, Korea, and Hong Kong. Journal of Medical Internet Research18(3): e4193.
48.
SouthwellBGThorsonEA (2015) The prevalence, consequence, and remedy of misinformation in mass media systems. Journal of Communication65: 589–595.
49.
SteeleCM (1988) The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In: BerkowitzL (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 261–302.
50.
SteeleCMSpencerSJLynchM (1993) Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64(6): 885.
51.
SunYChiaSCLuFOktavianusJ (2022) The battle is on: Factors that otivate people to combat anti-vaccine misinformation. Health Communication37: 327–336.
52.
TanASLeeCJChaeJ (2015) Exposure to health (mis) information: Lagged effects on young adults’ health behaviors and potential pathways. Journal of Communication65(4): 674–698.
53.
TandocECLimDLingR (2020) Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism21(3): 381–398.
54.
TannenbaumMBHeplerJZimmermanRSSaulLJacobsSWilsonK, et al. (2015) Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin141(6): 1178–1204.
55.
ThomaesSBushmanBJde CastroBOReijntjesA (2012) Arousing “gentle passions” in young adolescents: Sustained experimental effects of value affirmations on prosocial feelings and behaviors. Developmental Psychology48(1): 103–110.
56.
TullyMBodeLVragaEK (2020) Mobilizing users: does exposure to misinformation and its correction affect users’ responses to a health misinformation post?Social Media+ Society6(4). DOI: 10.1177/2056305120978377.
57.
Van der MeerTGJinY (2020) Seeking formula for misinformation treatment in public health crises: The effects of corrective information type and source. Health Communication35(5): 560–575.
58.
Van LeeuwenE (2007) Restoring identity through outgroup helping: Beliefs about international aid in response to the December 2004 tsunami. European Journal of Social Psychology37(4): 661–671.
59.
VragaEKBodeL (2017) Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication39(5): 621–645.
60.
VragaEKBodeL (2018) I do not believe you: How providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication, & Society21(10): 1337–1353.
61.
WalterNMurphyST (2018) How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation. Communication Monographs85(3): 423–441.
62.
WalterNTukachinskyR (2020) A meta-analytic examination of the continued influence of misinformation in the face of correction: How powerful is it, why does it happen, and how to stop it?Communication Research47(2): 155–177.
63.
WalterNDemetriadesSZMurphyST (2017) Involved, united, and efficacious: Could self-affirmation be the solution to California’s drought?Health Communication32(9): 1161–1170.
64.
WangX (2020) From a terror management perspective: The efficacy of self-affirmation on organ donation-related thoughts and intentions in China. The Journal of Social Psychology160: 644–657.
65.
WelieJV (2012) Social contract theory as a foundation of the social responsibilities of health professionals. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy15(3): 347–355.
66.
WestJDBergstromCT (2021) Misinformation in and about science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118(15): e1912444117.
67.
WitteK (1992) Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs59(4): 329–349.
68.
WitteK (1998) Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In: AndersenPAGuerreroLK (eds) Handbook of Communication and Emotion: Research, Theory, Applications, and Contexts. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 423–450.
69.
WitteKAllenM (2000) A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior27(5): 591–615.
70.
WitteKCameronKAMcKeonJBerkowitzJ (1996) Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication1(4): 317–341. DOI: 10.1080/108107396127988.
71.
WitteKMeyerGMartellD (2001) The risk behavior diagnosis scale. In: Effective Health Risk Messages: A Step-by-step Guide. London: SAGE, pp. 67–76. DOI: 10.1002/tqem.3310070208.
ZhangXLiuSDengZChenX (2017) Knowledge sharing motivations in online health communities: A comparative study of health professionals and normal users. Computers in Human Behavior75: 797–810.
74.
ZhaoXNanX (2010) Influence of self-affirmation on responses to gain-versus loss-framed antismoking messages. Human Communication Research36(4): 493–511.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
