Drawing from network theory and previous findings from US-based analyses, we measure the structure and interconnectedness of climate contrarian think tanks in Europe. This exploratory analysis can illustrate European organizations’ capacity to promote or disrupt political discourse. To this end, we use social network analysis to conduct actor-focused research. We identify the individuals bridging European think tanks, as well as their ties with the US climate change contrarian network. Our analysis reveals a discernible network structure for European climate change contrarian think tanks, with a profile connected to neoliberal organizations, including a few, but highly relevant links, with the US countermovement. We also find that the European think tanks’ institutional structure is very much shaped by a strong predominance of men, which aligns with previous research on masculinity and climate contrarianism.
AlmironNXifraJ (2020) Climate Change Denial and Public Relations. Strategic Communication and Interest Groups in Climate Inaction. Abingdon: Routledge.
2.
AlmironNXifraJ (2021) Rethinking Think Tanks. Experts vs. Impostors. Zaragoza: University of Zaragoza.
3.
AlmironNBoykoffMNarberhausMHerasF (2020) Dominant counter-frames in influential climate contrarian European think tanks. Climatic Change162(4): 2003–2020.
4.
AnshelmJHultmanM (2014) A green fatwā? Climate change as a threat to the masculinity of industrial modernity. Norma9(2): 84–96.
BourdieuB (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood, pp. 241–58.
7.
BrandesUBorgattiSPFreemanLC (2016) Maintaining the duality of closeness and betweenness centrality. Social Networks44: 153–159.
8.
BrulleRJ (2021) Networks of opposition: A structural analysis of U.S. climate change countermovement coalitions 1989–2015. Sociological Inquiry91: 603–624.
9.
BurtR (2000) The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior22: 345–423.
10.
BurtR (2007) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. New York: Oxford University Press.
DomhoffGW (2014) Who Rules America? The Triumph of the Corporate Rich. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
13.
DunlapREMcCrightAM (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: DryzekJSNorgaardRBSchlosbergD (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 144–160.
KelstrupJD (2016) The Politics of Think Tanks in Europe. London: Routledge.
23.
KrangeOKaltenbornBPHultmanM (2019) Cool dudes in Norway: Climate change denial among conservative Norwegian men. Environmental Sociology5(1): 1–11.
24.
LaumannEOMarsdenPVPrenskyD (1983) The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In: BurtRMinorM (eds) Applied Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp. 18–34.
25.
LippmanW (1991 [1922]) Public Opinion. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
26.
LockwoodM (2018) Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics27(4): 712–732.
27.
McCrightAMDunlapRE (2011) Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change21(4): 1163–1172.
28.
McCrightAMDunlapREMarquart-PyattST (2016) Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics25(2): 338–358.
29.
McGannJGShullA (2018) Think Tanks and Emerging Power Policy Networks (ed. McGannJG). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
30.
McPhersonMSmith-LovinLCookJM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology27(1): 415–444.
MedvetzT (2012) Think Tanks in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
OreskesNConwayEM (2010) Merchants of Doubt. London: Bloomsbury.
34.
PlehweD (2014) Think tank networks and the knowledge–interest nexus: The case of climate change. Critical Policy Studies8(1): 101–115.
35.
PlehweD (2017) Social networks of influence in Europe—and beyond. In: BüllesbachDCilleroMStolzL (eds) Shifting Baselines of Europe. Wetzlar: Transcript Verlag, pp. 147–157.
36.
PlehweDFischerK (2013) Redes de Think Tanks e intelectuales de derecha en América Latina [Networks of Think Tanks and right-wing intellectuals in Latin America]. Nueva Sociedad245: 70–86.
PlehweDNeujeffskiMKrämerW (2018) Saving the dangerous idea: Austerity think tank networks in the European Union. Policy and Society37(2): 188–205.
39.
PlehweDSlobodianQMirowskiP (eds) (2020) Nine Lives of Neoliberalism. London: Verso.
40.
Porto de OliveiraO (2021) Handbook of Policy Transfer, Diffusion and Circulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
41.
PutnamR (2001) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
42.
RekkerR (2021) The nature and origins of political polarization over science. Public Understanding of Science30(4): 352–368.
43.
SajuriaJvanHeerde-HudsonJHudsonDDasandiNTheocharisY (2015) Tweeting alone? An analysis of bridging and bonding social capital in online networks. American Politics Research43(4): 708–738.
44.
ScottJ (1988) Social network analysis. Sociology22(1): 109–127.
45.
StoneD (2013) Capturing the Political Imagination. Think Tanks and the Policy Process. London: Frank Cass.
46.
TeichlerT (2007) Think tanks as an epistemic community: The case of European armaments cooperation. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the international studies association 48th annual convention, 28 February - 3 March, Chicago, IL.
47.
WalterSLörcherIBrüggemannM (2019) Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists’ interactions in the climate change debate. Public Understanding of Science28(6): 696–712.
